Triple-negative breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with different molecular and histological subtypes. The Androgen receptor is expressed in a portion of triple-negative breast cancer cases and the activation of the androgen receptor pathway is thought to be a molecular subtyping signature as well as a therapeutic target for triple-negative breast cancer. Thus, identification of the androgen receptor pathway status is important for both molecular characterization andclinical management. In this study, we investigate the expression of the androgen receptor pathway in metaplastic breast cancer and luminal androgen receptor subtypes of triple-negative breast cancer and found that the androgen receptor pathway was downregulated in metaplastic breast cancer compared to luminal androgen receptor subtype. Using random forest, we found that the two subtypes of breast cancer can be molecularly classified with the gene expression of the androgen receptor pathway.
Background: Apocrine carcinoma is a rare subtype of invasive ductal breast cancer that shows apocrine differentiation and largely with triple negative immunohistology. Triple negative breast cancers are known to have a more aggressive clinical course. However, unlike the most other types, it is reported that triple negative apocrine carcinoma has a better prognosis. Due to scarcity of reported studies, our knowledges for its clinical behavior, prognosis and response to therapy are very limited. Methods: In this study, we retrospectively retrieved 41 triple negative apocrine carcinoma cases from our breast cancer database with an average follow up 32.8 months.Results: It was found that triple negative apocrine carcinoma had poorer response to neoadjuvant therapy, but better prognosis compared with other non-apocrine types of triple negative breast cancer. Meanwhile, triple negative apocrine carcinoma has a low proliferative nature as indicated by its low Ki67 index. Analysis of SEER database showed that chemotherapy did not improve breast cancer specific survival in TNAC patients. Conclusions: Our results suggest that triple negative apocrine carcinoma is a special subtype of triple negative breast cancer for which de-escalation of chemotherapy should be considered.
Apocrine carcinoma is a rare subtype of invasive ductal breast cancer that shows apocrine differentiation and largely triple-negative immunohistology. Triple-negative breast cancers are known to have more aggressive clinical courses. However, unlike most other subtypes, it is reported that triple-negative apocrine carcinoma (TNAC) has a better prognosis. Due to the scarcity of reported studies, our knowledge regarding its clinical behavior, prognosis and response to therapy is very limited. In this study, we retrospectively retrieved 41 triple-negative apocrine carcinoma cases from our breast cancer database, with an average follow-up of 32.8 months. It was found that TNAC had a poorer response to neoadjuvant therapy but a better prognosis than other nonapocrine types of triple-negative breast cancer. Meanwhile, TNAC has a low proliferative nature, as indicated by its low Ki-67 index. An updated analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database showed that chemotherapy did not improve breast-cancer-specific survival in TNAC patients. Our results suggest that TNAC is a special subtype of triple-negative breast cancer with a better short-term prognosis despite poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Background
Androgen receptor (AR) expression is frequently observed in breast cancer, but its association with estrogen receptor (ER) expression of breast cancer remains unclear.
Methods
In this study, we analyzed the clinicopathological and molecular features associated AR loss in ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer respectively, trying to elucidate the molecular correlation between AR and ER.
Results
Our results showed that AR loss was associated with different clinicopathological characteristics in ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer. Moreover, the expression of AR was correlated with different molecular features in ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer.
Conclusions
These results suggest that the role of AR in ER-positive breast cancer is distinctive from that in ER-negative breast cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.