Après une année 2010 qui fut de nouveau la plus meurtrière pour la coalition en Afghanistan, et au moment où un certain nombre de pays contributeurs annonce le retrait de leurs forces, on peut s’interroger sur l’efficacité de l’Alliance atlantique. Initialement conçue pour combattre les divisions mécanisées du Pacte de Varsovie, l’OTAN se retrouve enlisée face à une insurrection faiblement armée mais très motivée, et incapable de s’adapter à ce nouveau type de conflit. Cette crise, tant doctrinale que militaire, trouve ses racines à la fois dans l’évolution des missions confiées à l’Alliance, notamment à partir de 2006, et son expansion vers un contrôle de l’ensemble du pays. Et si les États contributeurs évoquent d’une seule voix la nécessité d’une stratégie commune, fondée sur la gouvernance et la sécurité, les restrictions d’emploi et les questions de politique intérieure réduisent l’efficacité de l’OTAN, comme le soulignait le faible nombre de troupes déployées jusqu’à la reprise en main américaine et le plan Obama à partir de 2009.
Anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) has turned very recently into a buzzword to define Russian strategy to limit, disrupt or even interdict NATO forces to reinforce the Baltic states in the case of an escalation between the alliance and Russia. This article puts in context how these discussions have re-emerged since 2014 and how Russia has developed a comprehensive defense system that effectively give the impression of impenetrable 'bubbles'. Yet, NATO has to cope with a not-so-new threat, being caught between two extremes: on the one hand, being serious and credible-maintaining its superior technological military edge and show-casing it by deploying troops and materials in contested areas, and on the other hand, being a defensive alliance, not giving any credit to the Russians by creating a dangerous spiral. This paper argues that it is time to develop a truly comprehensive counter-A2AD strategy, which would take several aspects: maintaining and expanding the reassurance measures (in the air, on the seas and on the ground), improve our doctrines to think big again (by recreating divisions and corps as maneuver units) and consider the need to be seen as a credible deterrent. These military aspects would be complemented by political and diplomatic considerations to ensure possible retaliatory measures, if Russia would further destabilize its neighborhood through an aggressive policy. What is at stake is NATO's being not just a resilient and adaptive organization facing todays's complex challenges, but its core ability to maintain, 70 years after its birth, the very notion of collective defense in which all the allies trust.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.