LabPET GE 4 (a small animal positron emission tomograph) image acquisition is done by 1536 independents channels. Differences in the rate counting of each channel must be corrected so as not compromise image quality. Equipment user manual recommends that normalization of the detectors efficiency be made as often as possible and always whenever there are hardware or software parameters changes - included, but not limited to channels parameters adjustments, electronic cards replacements, channels activation or inactivation or software update. This work evaluates the normalization effects on the image quality parameters. PET image acquisition were performed using recommended parameters by the NEMA NU 4-2008 standards. Image was reconstructed in different ways using different normalization files. The tests performed indicated that the image quality parameters do not vary significantly with different normalization data. Therefore, a daily routine of normalizations is not justified, suggesting a periodical frequency of one month or more for this procedure.
Positron emission tomography (PET) is an important molecular image modality and its application on preclinical research has increased during last decades. Thus, in laboratory practice, it is important to implement a quality control of the equipment, since intrinsic factors influence the image quality. The objective of this work was to perform and implement spatial resolution tests for the small animal PET scanner of the Molecular Imaging Laboratory, LIM/CDTN. Empirically, spatial resolution of a PET scanner can be determined from the measurement of point or linear sources and FWHM (full width half maximum) analysis of the respective linear profiles. In this work, a point source of 22Na and a hot rod style phantom filled with 18F-FDG solution were used. Acquisition and reconstruction of images were performed with the LabPET 1.12.1 software, provided by the equipment manufacturer. Image reconstruction parameters followed the LIM standard protocol: MLEM-3D algorithm, 20 iterations, no high resolution mode, no attenuation or scatter corrections, no post-filtering. PeakFit® and Amide softwares were used to perform images post-processing. The results indicate that the scanner has an adequate spatial resolution and its value is compatible with values reported in international studies performed on similar equipments.
Computed Tomography (CT) is a diagnostic imaging method and has been widely used in medical applications. CT exams have increased substantially and promote higher dose deposition in population. CT dosimetry references are characterized by Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI). In this work was used a set of two head CT phantoms, made of PMMA. The first head phantom is the standard adult, and it is a cylinder with 16 cm in diameter and 15 cm in length, coupled to a complementary cylinder of PMMA with the same diameter and 7,5 in length. In this phantom set, a circular sheet of GAFCHROMIC® XR-QA2 radiochromic film was loaded between the cylinders. A distance of 10 cm of the phantom set was scanned with the film in the central slice position, using an X-ray beam of 100 kV and 200 mA.s. The scanning was made in a CT scanner GE, LightSpeed VCT model with 64 channel. Digital film images were obtained before and after the CT scanning and they were processed with the digital image viewer imageJ software, to obtain the dose variation in the central slice recorded by the film sheet. Dose variation profile were obtained for horizontal and vertical axes (X and Y) of the central slice. The absorbed dose recorded on the film ranged from 18.03 to 30.40 mGy for the X axis and from 21.52 to 33.85 mGy for the Y axis. The dose value obtained in center, where is the intersection of the X and Y axes, was approximately 22.73 mGy. From these values it became possible to calculate the CTDIvol value using radiochromic films.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.