Although functional asymmetries in the course of visual information processing have been known for a long time in humans as well as in non-human species, the structural basis of these asymmetries is largely unknown. We now report that due to an asymmetry of commissural projections in the pigeon the left nucleus rotundus of the ascending tectofugal visual system predominantly represents inputs from both eyes while the right nucleus rotundus mainly represents the contralateral left eye. We suggest that a comparable organization exists for several asymmetries in humans. A representation of both hemifields can provide the dominant hemisphere with direct access to all stimulus features when objects cross the vertical meridian.
Handedness is one of the main issues in laterality research and is known to be related to a large number of morphological asymmetries of the central nervous system. However, the main focus of previous studies were cerebral structures, which ignored the spinal cord as the most distal neural entity innervating the muscles of the extremities. We analyzed morphometrically motoneurons from segments innervating the arms and hands and compared them with motoneurons of segments that innervated the upper trunk. We found an asymmetry with larger motoneuron perikaryas on the right side of the spinal cord in segments innervating the upper limbs. To our knowledge this is the first time a morphological asymmetry on single-cell-level was shown in the spinal cord of man. The possible relation of this cellular asymmetry to the origins of handedness is discussed.
The interaction between nonassociative learning (presentation frequencies) and associative learning (reinforcement rates) in stimulus discrimination performance was investigated. Subjects were taught to discriminate lists of visual pattern pairs. When they chose the stimulus designated as right they were symbolically rewarded and when they chose the stimulus designated as wrong they were symbolically penalised. Subjects first learned one list and then another list. For a "right" group the pairs of the second list consisted of right stimuli from the first list and of novel wrong stimuli. For a "wrong" group it was the other way round. The right group transferred some discriminatory performance from the first to the second list while the control and wrong groups initially only performed near chance with the second list. When the first list involved wrong stimuli presented twice as frequently as right stimuli, the wrong group exhibited a better transfer than the right group. In a final experiment subjects learned lists which consisted of frequent right stimuli paired with scarce wrong stimuli and frequent wrong stimuli paired with scarce right stimuli. In later test trials these stimuli were shown in new combinations and additionally combined with novel stimuli. Subjects preferred to choose the most rewarded stimuli and to avoid the most penalised stimuli when the test pairs included at least one frequent stimulus. With scarce/scarce or scarce/novel stimulus combinations they performed less well or even chose randomly. A simple mathematical model that ascribes stimulus choices to a Cartesian combination of stimulus frequency and stimulus value succeeds in matching all these results with satisfactory precision.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.