Understanding the genetic composition and mating systems of edge populations provides important insights into the environmental and demographic factors shaping species’ distribution ranges. We analysed samples of the mangrove Avicennia marina from Vietnam, northern Philippines and Australia, with microsatellite markers. We compared genetic diversity and structure in edge (Southeast Asia, and Southern Australia) and core (North and Eastern Australia) populations, and also compared our results with previously published data from core and southern edge populations. Comparisons highlighted significantly reduced gene diversity and higher genetic structure in both margins compared to core populations, which can be attributed to very low effective population size, pollinator scarcity and high environmental pressure at distribution margins. The estimated level of inbreeding was significantly higher in northeastern populations compared to core and southern populations. This suggests that despite the high genetic load usually associated with inbreeding, inbreeding or even selfing may be advantageous in margin habitats due to the possible advantages of reproductive assurance, or local adaptation. The very high level of genetic structure and inbreeding show that populations of A. marina are functioning as independent evolutionary units more than as components of a metapopulation system connected by gene flow. The combinations of those characteristics make these peripheral populations likely to develop local adaptations and therefore to be of particular interest for conservation strategies as well as for adaptation to possible future environmental changes.

No abstract

Mangrove communities in the tropical north of Australia are some of the most species rich in the world, yet surprisingly little is known of their reproductive and vegetative phenology. This study investigated the phenology of four mangrove species: Avicennia marina (Forsk.) Vierh., Ceriops australis (C.T.White) Ballment, T.J.Sm & Stoddart, Rhizophora stylosa Griff. and Sonneratia alba J.Smith, in Darwin Harbour over 24 months. Investigations included documenting the flowering and fruiting phenology, periods of leaf flush and leaf longevity. Flowering in these mangroves generally occurred during the dry season (June–October), with the exception of R. stylosa in which flowering occurred in the middle of the wet (December–February). Fruits and propagules were released in the dry and ‘build up’ periods (August–November), with the exception of A. marina, which released propagules in the middle of the wet season. Fruit and/or propagule maturation took less than 2 months in A. marina and S. alba, whereas in C. australis and R. stylosa maturation took 12 and 11 months, respectively. Timing of new leaf production generally coincided with the wet season, after the flowering and fruiting periods of each of the four species. Periods of leaf flush and leaf fall were often closely linked, and species with longer-lived leaves produced fewer leaves at each period of leaf flush. Maximum leaf longevity varied considerably among mangroves, ranging from 8 months in the lower canopy of S. alba to more than 24 months in C. australis. There was also large variability in leaf longevity among different regions of the canopy, with shade leaves generally living longer than sun leaves, and leaves in the upper canopy (3–7 m) longer than those in the lower regions (0–3 m).

No abstract