This study examined happiness and satisfaction as possible foundations for long-term well-being and resilience in dendental school's faculty, students, and alumni also enhanced their perceived well-being and resilience and to determine the factor they received from clinical faculty members contributed most to their happiness. The lowest level of happiness among the groups participants in our study. More research is needed to understand the relationship among positive environments, well-being, and provider resilience in dental education.-erober@midwestern.edu.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether there was a statistically signiicant positive correlation between dental students' Dental Admission Test (DAT) scores, particularly on the Perceptual Ability Test (PAT), and their performance on a dental school's competency exam. Scores from the written and clinical competency exam administered in the fall quarter of the fourth year of the curriculum at Midwestern University College of Dental Medicine-Arizona were compared to DAT scores of all 216 members of the graduating classes of 2012 and 2013. It was hypothesized that students who performed highly on one or more sections of the DAT would perform highly on the competency exam. Backward stepwise regression analyses were used to analyze the data. The results showed that the PAT scores were most strongly correlated with the competency exam scores and were a positive predictor for all three clinical sections of the exam (operative dentistry, periodontics, and endodontics). Positive predictors for the written portion of the exam were total DAT score for patient assessment and treatment planning and the DAT reading comprehension score for prosthodontics; there were no predictors for periodontics. The total variance explained by the results ranged from 4% to 15%. While statistically signiicant relationships were found between the students' PAT scores and clinical performance, DAT scores explained relatively little variance in the competency exam scores. According to these indings, neither the PAT nor any of the DAT components contributed to predicting these students' clinical performance.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a pilot preclinical incentive program on dental students’ performance on a clinical competency (mock board) exam at Midwestern University College of Dental Medicine‐Arizona. To assess the effect of preclinical grade incentives in a program called SUCCEED, scores from a clinical competency exam administered during the fall quarter of the fourth year were compared between the graduating classes of 2014 and 2015 (pre‐SUCCEED curriculum) and the graduating class of 2016 (post‐SUCCEED curriculum). The study hypothesized that the class participating in the SUCCEED program, with its incentives for greater preclinical preparation and practice, would score higher than the other classes on the exams. The results showed that the endodontics and periodontics pass rates and test scores from the Class of 2016 were higher than those from the Classes of 2014 and 2015; the prosthodontics pass rates were similar; and the operative dentistry pass rates and test scores were lower than the Classes of 2014 and 2015. While the results of two of the four subsections of the competency exam showed an improvement in clinical performance for the Class of 2016, the operative dentistry test scores for that class were less than expected. Based on the increased number of operative dentistry procedures performed in preclinical simulation and the clinic, the authors conclude that the competency exam should not be the only measure to evaluate success of the SUCCEED program.

No abstract

This prospective clinical study evaluated the experiences and preferences of both patients and clinicians when performing class I–V cavity preparation procedures using a 9300 nm CO2 laser without anesthetic. A total of 233 procedures were performed on 103 patients. Following treatment, patients were asked to describe discomfort/pain levels and preferences for future treatment with either laser treatment or traditional therapy. Additionally, clinicians were asked to rate their experiences with the procedures in three technical domains: speed, ease-of-use, and precision. In total, 98% of patients preferred laser treatment to traditional therapy and 93% of all procedures performed were completed with no anesthesia. Younger patients and patients receiving multiple restorations reported significantly higher discomfort, though discomfort scores were very low overall (below 3 on a 10-point pain scale). While there were significant differences in clinician experiences, each clinician reported having generally high satisfaction using the laser with respect to speed, ease of use, and precision. In conclusion, the 9300 nm CO2 laser provides clinicians a viable option for cavity preparations in dentistry as evidenced by high rates of anesthesia-free procedures with low reported discomfort, the fact that nearly all patients would opt for laser use on future cavity preparations, and generally positive experiences reported by clinicians.