Approximately one third of S aureus catheter-related bacteremias were community acquired, reflecting increased usage of intravascular devices for home parenteral support. A 10- to 15-day course of parenteral antibiotics was equivalent to longer courses of therapy in patients without early complications.
The in vitro activity of RP59500, a streptogramin antibiotic, against 146 clinical isolates of vancomycin-resistant gram-positive bacteria was examined. Five strains of the species Enterococcus casseliflavus and Enterococcus gallinarum, for which the MIC of vancomycin was 8 micrograms/ml, were also studied. Twenty-eight vancomycin-susceptible strains of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium were included for comparison. The drug was highly active against Leuconostoc spp., Lactobacillus spp., and Pediococcus spp. (MICs, < or = 2 micrograms/ml). RP59500 was more active against vancomycin-susceptible strains of E. faecium than E. faecalis (MICs for 90% of the strains [MIC90s], 1.0 versus 32 micrograms/ml). Vancomycin-resistant strains of E. faecalis were as resistant to RP59500 as vancomycin-susceptible strains (MIC90, 32 micrograms/ml), but some vancomycin-resistant E. faecium strains were relatively more resistant to the new agent (MIC90, 16; MIC range, 0.5 to 32 micrograms/ml) than were vancomycin-susceptible organisms of this species.
BackgroundComplicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) frequently result in hospitalization with significant morbidity and mortality.MethodsIn this phase 3b/4 parallel, randomized, open-label, comparative study, 531 subjects with cSSSI received tigecycline (100 mg initial dose, then 50 mg intravenously every 12 hrs) or ampicillin-sulbactam 1.5-3 g IV every 6 hrs or amoxicillin-clavulanate 1.2 g IV every 6-8 hrs. Vancomycin could be added at the discretion of the investigator to the comparator arm if methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was confirmed or suspected within 72 hrs of enrollment. The primary endpoint was clinical response in the clinically evaluable (CE) population at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit. Microbiologic response and safety were also assessed. The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population comprised 531 subjects (tigecycline, n = 268; comparator, n = 263) and 405 were clinically evaluable (tigecycline, n = 209; comparator, n = 196).ResultsIn the CE population, 162/209 (77.5%) tigecycline-treated subjects and 152/196 (77.6%) comparator-treated subjects were clinically cured (difference 0.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.7, 8.6). The eradication rates at the subject level for the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population were 79.2% in the tigecycline treatment group and 76.8% in the comparator treatment group (difference 2.4; 95% CI: -9.6, 14.4) at the TOC assessment. Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea rates were higher in the tigecycline group.ConclusionsTigecycline was generally safe and effective in the treatment of cSSSIs.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00368537
The in vitro susceptibility of 27 clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori to erythromycin, clarithromycin, azithromycin and temafloxacin under various pH conditions was evaluated. Clarithromycin (MIC90 0.03 micrograms/ml) was found to be significantly more active than either erythromycin (MIC90 0.125 micrograms/ml) or azithromycin (MIC90 0.25 micrograms/ml) at a neutral pH. Lowering the pH to 5.75 resulted in a loss in efficacy from 8- to 32-fold for all three macrolides studied. The MIC90 of clarithromycin (0.5 micrograms/ml) remained lower than those of azithromycin (2 micrograms/ml) and erythromycin (4 micrograms/ml). No synergism or antagonism was observed with combinations of clarithromycin and temafloxacin at either the neutral or lower pH values.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.