Summary1. Natural resources and ecosystem services provided by the world's major biomes are increasingly threatened by anthropogenic impacts. Rehabilitation is a common approach to recreating and maintaining habitats, but limitations to the success of traditional techniques necessitate new approaches. 2. Almost one-third of the world's productive seagrass meadows have been lost in the past 130 years. Using a combined total of three seagrass species at seven sites over 8 years, we experimentally assessed the performance of multiple rehabilitation methods that utilize fundamentally different ecological approaches. 3. First, traditional methods of transplantation were tested and produced varied survival (0-80%) that was site dependent. Secondly, seedling culture and outplanting produced poor survival (2-9%) but reasonable growth. Finally, a novel method that used sand-filled bags of hessian to overcome limitations of traditional techniques by facilitating recruitment and establishment of seedlings in situ produced recruit densities of 150-350 seedlings m 4.Results indicate that facilitating seagrass recruitment in situ using hessian bags can provide a new tool to alleviate current limitations to successful rehabilitation (e.g. mobile sediments, investment of time and resources), leading to more successful management and mitigation of contemporary losses. Hessian bags have distinct environmental and economic advantages over other methods tested in that they do not damage existing meadows, are biodegradable, quick to deploy, and cost less per hectare (US$16 737) than the estimated ecosystem value of seagrass meadows (US$27 039 year )1 ). 5. Synthesis and applications. This research demonstrates how exploring alternate ecological approaches to habitat rehabilitation can expand our collective toolbox for successfully re-creating complex and productive ecosystems, and alleviate the destructive side-effects and low success rates of more traditional techniques. Moreover, new methods can offer economic and environmental solutions to the restrictions placed upon managers of natural resources.

We undertook a long-term (27 mo) field experiment to test if a chronic increase in water column nutrients could cause a decline in 2 temperate Australian seagrasses and if this decline could be linked to nutrient-mediated changes in epiphytes. Two seagrasses, Amphibolis antarctica and Posidonia sinuosa, were exposed to minor increases (~2 to 5×) in nutrient (N, P) concentrations utilising slow-release fertiliser over a 15 mo period at a shallow (~2 m depth), oligotrophic marine site in Gulf St Vincent, South Australia. Fertiliser had a significant detrimental effect on biomass, density, and canopy height in both seagrasses. Moreover, the seagrass biomass reductions coincided with increased epiphyte loads and changes in epiphyte composition. After a 12 mo recovery period, epiphyte loads in the fertiliser treatments had returned to levels comparable to the control, but the fertiliser-treated seagrasses had not recovered. While the precise mechanism of seagrass decline is still unclear, our results have demonstrated that (under certain circumstances) chronic, yet minor, increases in water column nutrient concentrations can cause the slow decline of Amphibolis and Posidonia spp. Furthermore, while future management decisions regarding anthropogenic nutrient discharges into seagrass ecosystems should be assessed on a case-by-case basis, our results and those of other workers investigating large-scale losses of Amphibolis and Posidonia in southern Australia indicate that extreme caution must be applied where these seagrasses occur in shallow, sheltered oligo trophic marine environments.

Attempts to arrest seagrass loss through numerous rehabilitation methods have traditionally produced inconsistent results. On Australia's southern coast, hessian bags made from biodegradable jute fibers show promise for rehabilitating Amphibolis antarctica by facilitating recruitment of seedlings in situ. Testing ways to improve the performance of bags (i.e. increasing seagrass recruitment and establishment) showed that bags with a coarse outer weave of hessian facilitated greater seedling densities (approximately 1700 individuals/m 2 ) than bags with a fine outer weave, but the content of bags (sand vs. sand and rubble mixture) had little effect. Isolated bags facilitated greater longer term densities than bags grouped together, while similar densities were sampled up to 80 m away from a natural meadow. Lastly, bags that had spent less time in situ initially facilitated more recruits than older bags, but longer term (21-32 months) retention was similar among bag ages. Collectively, the results suggest hessian bags can be a relatively simple, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly method for rehabilitating Amphibolis seagrass, with few considerations in their use other than their physical architecture and arrangement (e.g. isolated coarse-weave bags).

No abstract

No abstract