ObjectiveWe hypothesized that specific mutations in the β‐glucocerebrosidase gene (GBA) causing neuropathic Gaucher's disease (GD) in homozygotes lead to aggressive cognitive decline in heterozygous Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, whereas non‐neuropathic GD mutations confer intermediate progression rates.MethodsA total of 2,304 patients with PD and 20,868 longitudinal visits for up to 12.8 years (median, 4.1) from seven cohorts were analyzed. Differential effects of four types of genetic variation in GBA on longitudinal cognitive decline were evaluated using mixed random and fixed effects and Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsOverall, 10.3% of patients with PD and GBA sequencing carried a mutation. Carriers of neuropathic GD mutations (1.4% of patients) had hazard ratios (HRs) for global cognitive impairment of 3.17 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60–6.25) and a hastened decline in Mini–Mental State Exam scores compared to noncarriers (p = 0.0009). Carriers of complex GBA alleles (0.7%) had an HR of 3.22 (95% CI, 1.18–8.73; p = 0.022). By contrast, the common, non‐neuropathic N370S mutation (1.5% of patients; HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 0.92–4.18) or nonpathogenic risk variants (6.6% of patients; HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.89–2.05) did not reach significance.InterpretationMutations in the GBA gene pathogenic for neuropathic GD and complex alleles shift longitudinal cognitive decline in PD into “high gear.” These findings suggest a relationship between specific types of GBA mutations and aggressive cognitive decline and have direct implications for improving the design of clinical trials. Ann Neurol 2016;80:674–685

NCT01564992.

Aim The aim of this paper is to describe the clinical features of COVID‐19‐related encephalopathy and their metabolic correlates using brain 2‐desoxy‐2‐fluoro‐D‐glucose (FDG)‐positron‐emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging. Background and purpose A variety of neurological manifestations have been reported in association with COVID‐19. COVID‐19‐related encephalopathy has seldom been reported and studied. Methods We report four cases of COVID‐19‐related encephalopathy. The diagnosis was made in patients with confirmed COVID‐19 who presented with new‐onset cognitive disturbances, central focal neurological signs, or seizures. All patients underwent cognitive screening, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), lumbar puncture, and brain 2‐desoxy‐2‐fluoro‐D‐glucose (FDG)‐positron‐emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) (FDG‐PET/CT). Results The four patients were aged 60 years or older, and presented with various degrees of cognitive impairment, with predominant frontal lobe impairment. Two patients presented with cerebellar syndrome, one patient had myoclonus, one had psychiatric manifestations, and one had status epilepticus. The delay between first COVID‐19 symptoms and onset of neurological symptoms was between 0 and 12 days. None of the patients had MRI features of encephalitis nor significant cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) abnormalities. SARS‐CoV‐2 RT‐PCR in the CSF was negative for all patients. All patients presented with a consistent brain FDG‐PET/CT pattern of abnormalities, namely frontal hypometabolism and cerebellar hypermetabolism. All patients improved after immunotherapy. Conclusions Despite varied clinical presentations, all patients presented with a consistent FDG‐PET pattern, which may reflect an immune mechanism.

Summary Background Cognitive decline is a debilitating manifestation of disease progression in Parkinson’s disease. We aimed to develop a clinical-genetic score to predict global cognitive impairment in patients with the disease. Methods A prediction algorithm for global cognitive impairment (defined as Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) ≤25) was built using data from 1,350 patients with 5,165 longitudinal visits over 12.8 (median, 2.8) years. Age at onset, MMSE, education, motor exam score, gender, depression and GBA mutations, machine selected through stepwise Cox’ hazards analysis and Akaike’s information criterion, were used to compute the multivariable predictor. Independent validation was achieved in another 1,132 patients with 19,127 visits over 8.6 (median, 6.5) years. Findings The cognitive risk score accurately predicted cognitive impairment within ten years of disease onset with an area under the curve (AUC) of >0.85 in both the discovery (95% CI, 0.821–0.902) and validation populations (95% CI, 0.779 – 0.913). 72.6% of patients scoring in the highest quartile were cognitively impaired by ten years vs. 3.7% in the lowest quartile (hazard ratio, 18.4, 95% CI, 9.4 – 36.1). Dementia or disabling cognitive impairment was predicted with an AUC of 0.877 (95% CI 0.788–0.943) and high negative predictive value (0.920, 95% 0.877–0.954) at the predefined cutoff (0.196). Performance was stable in 10,000 randomly resampled subsets. Interpretation Our predictive algorithm provides a potential test for future cognitive health or impairment in patients with Parkinson’s. It could improve trials of cognitive interventions and inform on prognosis.

Background Penetrance estimates of the LRRK2 p.G2019S mutation for Parkinson’s disease (PD) vary widely (24%–100%). The p.G2019S penetrance in individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry has been estimated as 25%, adjusted for multiple covariates. It is unknown whether penetrance varies among different ethnic groups. The objective of this study was to estimate the penetrance of p.G2019S in individuals of non-Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry and compare penetrance between Ashkenazi Jews and non-Ashkenazi Jews to age 80. Methods The kin-cohort method was used to estimate penetrance in 474 first-degree relatives of 69 non-Ashkenazi Jewish LRRK2 p.G2019S carrier probands at eight sites from the Michael J. Fox LRRK2 Cohort Consortium. An identical validated family history interview was administered to assess age at onset of PD, current age, or age at death for relatives in different ethnic groups at each site. Neurological examination and LRRK2 genotype of relatives were included, when available. Results Risk of PD in non-Ashkenazi Jewish relatives who carry a LRRK2 p.G2019S mutation was 42.5% (95% CI: 26.3 – 65.8%) to age 80 which is not significantly higher than the previously estimated 25% (95% CI: 16.7 – 34.2%) in Ashkenazi Jewish carrier relatives. The penetrance of PD to age 80 in LRRK2 p.G2019S mutation carrier relatives was significantly higher than the non-carrier relatives, as seen in Ashkenazi Jewish relatives. Conclusions The similar penetrance of LRRK2 p.G2019S estimated in Ashkenazi Jewish carriers and non-Ashkenazi Jewish carriers confirms that p.G2019S penetrance is 25–42.5% at age 80 in all populations analyzed.