Purpose: Promoter hypermethylation is an alternative pathway for gene silencing in neoplastic cells and a promising cancer detection marker. Although quantitative methylation-specific PCR (QMSP) of the GSTP1 promoter has demonstrated near perfect specificity for cancer detection in prostate biopsies, we postulated that identification and characterization of additional methylation markers might further improve its high (80 -90%) sensitivity.Experimental Design: We surveyed nine gene promoters (GSTP1, MGMT, p14/ARF, p16/CDKN2A, RASSF1A, APC, TIMP3, S100A2, and CRBP1) by QMSP in tissue DNA from 118 prostate carcinomas, 38 paired high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasias (HGPIN), and 30 benign prostatic hyperplasias (BPH). The methylation levels were calculated and were correlated with clinical and pathologic indicators.Results: Only the methylation frequencies of GSTP1 and APC were significantly higher in prostate carcinoma compared with BPH (P < 0.001). Methylation levels of GSTP1, APC, RASSF1A, and CRBP1, differed significantly between prostate carcinoma and HGPIN, and/or HGPIN or BPH (P < 0.0001).With QMSP and empirically defined cutoff values, the combined use of GSTP1 and APC demonstrated a theoretical sensitivity of 98.3% for prostate carcinoma, with 100% specificity. Methylation levels were found to correlate with tumor grade (GSTP1 and APC) and stage (GSTP1, RASSF1A, and APC).Conclusions: Our data demonstrate the existence of a progressive increase of promoter methylation levels of several cancer-related genes in prostate carcinogenesis, providing additional markers to augment molecular detection of prostate carcinoma. Because methylation levels of GSTP1, APC, and RASSF1A are associated with advanced grade and stage, QMSP might augment the pathologic indicators currently used to predict tumor aggressiveness.

We recently demonstrated the existence of speci®c patterns of somatic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations in several cancers. Here we sought to identify the presence of mtDNA mutations in prostate cancer and their paired PIN lesions. The D-loop region, 16S rRNA, and the NADH subunits of complex I were sequenced to identify mtDNA mutations in 16 matched PIN lesions and primary prostate cancers. Twenty mtDNA mutations were detected in the tumor tissue of three patients. Identical mutations were also identi®ed in the PIN lesion from one patient. This patient with multiple point mutations also harbored a high frequency of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) in nuclear mononucleotide repeat markers. Remarkably, identical mutations were also detected in all (3/3) matched urine and plasma samples obtained from these patients. Although mitochondrial mutations are less common in prostate adenocarcinoma, they occur early in cancer progression and they can be detected in bodily¯uids of early stage disease patients. The identi®cation of MtDNA mutations may complement other early detection approaches for prostate cancer. Oncogene (2001) 20, 5195 ± 5198.

We present the first characterisation of the mutational spectrum of the entire coding sequences and exon-intron boundaries of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes as well as large BRCA1 rearrangements in Portuguese families with inherited predisposition to breast/ovarian cancer. Of the 100 probands studied, pathogenic mutations were identified in 22 (24.7%) of 89 breast and/or ovarian cancer families with more than one affected member (15 in BRCA1 and seven in BRCA2), but in none of the 11 patients without family history of cancer. One (6.7%) of the BRCA1 mutations is a large deletion involving exons 11-15. Seven pathogenic point mutations are novel: 2088C>T, 2156delinsCC, and 4255_4256delCT in BRCA1 and 4608_4609delTT, 5036delA, 5583_5584insT, and 8923C>T in BRCA2. The novel 2156delinsCC was identified in three probands from different families and probably represents a founder mutation in our population. We also found a previously reported 3450_3453del4 mutation in three unrelated patients. In addition to the 22 pathogenic mutations, we identified 19 missense mutations of uncertain pathogenic significance, three of them (5241G>C in BRCA1 and IVS6+13C>T and 3731T>C in BRCA2) previously undescribed. The percentage of cases with truncating mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 was higher in breast/ovarian cancer (37.0%, mostly BRCA1) and male breast cancer (40%, all BRCA2) families than in families with only female breast cancer (17.5%). Interestingly, we found evidence for genetic anticipation regarding age at diagnosis of both breast and ovarian cancer in those families presenting affected members in more than one generation. These findings should be taken into consideration while planning screening and prophylactic measures in families with inherited predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer.

No abstract

The present study was undertaken to examine CYP1A1 and XRCC1 polymorphisms as potential genetic susceptibility markers for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Eighty-eight patients with laryngeal SCC and 178 randomly selected healthy blood donors from the same Caucasian population (Porto, Northern Portugal) were analysed for CYP1A1 (MspI and NcoI) and XRCC1 (Arg194Trp and Arg399Gln) polymorphisms, using PCR-RFLP techniques. CYP1A1 MspI MH (mutant homozygous) and CYP1A1 NcoI HT (heterozygous) genotypes were more frequent in patients than in controls, with those carrying a CYP1A1 NcoI HT genotype having a 2.3-fold higher risk for tumour development. On the other hand, polymorphisms in XRCC1 codon 399 and codon 194 do not seem to play a role in the aetiology of smoking-related laryngeal SCC, once its distribution was similar in both analysed groups. All the significant associations observed were exclusively due to differences between controls and larynx glottic cancer patient subgroup. Furthermore, lower lifetime tobacco consumption was observed in laryngeal SCC patients carrying the MspI and NcoI polymorphisms, than in those who did not show the polymorphic variants. This investigation seems to support the importance of CYP1A1 gene polymorphism as a potential genetic marker of laryngeal cancer development, specially concerning smokers who have inherited the at-risk genotypes CYP1A1 MspI MH or CYP1A1 NcoI HT, who do appear to be more susceptible to the development of SCC of the glottic larynx.

Our aim was to examine the role of NAT1 and NAT2 polymorphisms in human larynx cancer susceptibility. Genotype tests for NAT1 alleles *4, *10 and *11, and NAT2 alleles *4, *5, *6A and *7A, using PCR-RFLP analysis, were performed in 172 healthy Portuguese individuals and 88 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx. NAT1 and NAT2 genotype frequencies were correlated between patients and control groups, using the chi-square test. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated from 2 × 2 tables with the Fisher’s exact model. The statistical analysis of NAT1 and NAT2 genotype frequencies revealed a significant difference of NAT1*10/*11 (p = 0.038) and NAT2*5/*7 (p = 0.003) genotype distribution between cases and controls. We also observed differences concerning tumor location, since NAT1*10/*11 genotype frequency was significantly different when comparing normal control individuals with the glottic subgroup of patients. The present data suggest that NAT1 and NAT2 polymorphisms may be correlated with an increased risk of larynx cancer.

No abstract