The antinociceptive effect of morphine and oxycodone is mediated preferentially at m and k receptors, respectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic profile of the combination of morphine and oxycodone in cancer pain, compared to the standard administration of morphine alone. Controlled-release formulations of oxycodone (CRO) and morphine (CRM) were compared in 26 patients. The study started with an open-label, randomised titration phase to achieve stable pain control for 7 days, followed by a double-blind, randomised crossover phase in two periods, 14 days each. At any point, patients were allowed to use oral immediaterelease morphine (IRM) as needed, in order to keep visual analogue scale p4. Pain, satisfaction, adverse effects and number of daily rescue morphine tablets were assessed. A total of 22 patients were evaluated. The weekly upload consumption ratio in morphine/ oxycodone was 1 : 1.8 (1.80, 1.83, 1.76, 1.84). The weekly IRM consumption was higher in patients having CRM compared to patients having CRO (ratio morphine/oxycodone: 1.6, 1.6, 1.6, 1.7) (Po0.05). Patients receiving oxycodone complained of less nausea and vomiting. The rescue morphine analgesic consumption was 38% higher in patients receiving only morphine, compared to patients receiving both morphine and oxycodone. The results suggest that the combination of morphine/oxycodone (opioids with differential preferential sites of action) can be a useful alternative to morphine alone, resulting in a better analgesia profile and less emesis.
Naproxen is a widely used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug for the control of postoperative inflammatory signs and symptoms in dentistry. Its association with esomeprazole has been widely studied and has yielded good results for the control of acute pain, even with the delayed absorption of naproxen owing to the presence of esomeprazole. To further understand the absorption, distribution, and metabolism of this drug alone and in combination with esomeprazole, we will analyze the pharmacokinetic parameters of naproxen and its major metabolite, 6-O-desmethylnaproxen, in saliva samples. A rapid, sensitive, and selective liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method for the simultaneous determination of naproxen and 6-O-desmethylnaproxen in saliva will be developed and validated. Sequential saliva samples from six patients will be analyzed before and 0
Background:The initiation and progression of periodontitis might involve a local renin-angiotensin system in periodontal tissue. This study hypothesized that Losartan treatment could promote protection to rats submitted to experimental periodontitis (EP) by attenuating alveolar bone loss due to reduction in inflammatory cytokines, better reactive oxidant species regulation and maintenance of the balance between bone formation and resorption factors. Methods:One hundred and thirty rats were submitted to EP with a silk suture thread (4.0) placed around the lower right first molar for 1, 3, 7, and 14 consecutive days. The study comprised four groups: G1-control without EP; G2-animals with EP treated with water; G3-Losartan-treated animals (treatment started at the same day of EP induction), and G4-animals previously treated with Losartan for 30 days followed by induction of EP and continuity of treatment.Results: G2 rats had greater bone loss volume, increased number, and thickness and decreased separation of trabeculae. On the other hand, G4 animals showed significant improvements in these parameters. Histological analysis revealed that EP favors inflammatory cell infiltration and junctional epithelium, cementum with alveolar bone crest destruction, but animals pretreated with Losartan (G4) did not show these features. Although the G3 animals did not demonstrate the improvements detected in G4, mRNA expression results were similar. In mandibular tissue, EP promoted mRNA increases for ACE, AT1 receptor, and inflammatory mediators as well as decreases for antioxidant enzymes. However, Losartan treatments attenuated these responses in addition to promoting an increase in bone formation markers and transcription factors.Conclusion: AT1 receptor modulates EP progression. K E Y W O R D Santi-inflammatory agents, antioxidant(s), bone biology, connective tissue biology, cytokine(s), experimental periodontitis, gene expression J Periodontol. 2020;91:533-544.
The current literature has been discussing the risks and benefits of joint hypermobility (JHM) for careers in ballet This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of JHM and joint hypermobility syndrome (JHS) in a group of ballet teachers and students, looking both at aspects related to the flexibility required to dance, as at the risk of injuries when hypermobility is associated with other symptoms, in the case of JHS. We evaluated ballet teachers and ballet students, with age ranging from 18 to 40 years. All participants completed identification and sociodemographic questionnaires and underwent a physical examination. JHM was assessed using the Beighton score with goniometry. Symptoms of JHS were evaluated according to the Brighton criteria. Final sample consisted of 77 participants, being 44 ballet students and 33 ballet teachers. The prevalence of JHM in the sample as a whole was 58 %. Teachers and students had no significant differences regarding the prevalence of JHM (p = 0.74) (OR 1.21; 95 % CI 0.48-3.07). However, the prevalence of JHS was significantly different (p = 0.04) between students (16 %) and teachers (36 %). Teachers were three times more likely than student to have JHS (OR 3.02; 95 % CI 1.03-8.85). Teachers and students also presented differences in the frequency of specific items of Beighton score and Brighton criteria. These data provide elements to discuss the relationship between hypermobility, ballet technique and selection for dance, suggesting that dancers with JHS could find in ballet teaching an alternative to maintain professional activity with dance, while remaining protected from the higher risk of injury that professional dancers may be exposed to.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.