The objective of this study was to investigate the accurate AM and PL tunnel positions in an anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction using human cadaver knees with an intact ACL. Fifteen fresh-frozen non-paired adult human knees with a median age of 60 were used. AM and PL bundles were identified by the difference in tension patterns. First, the center of femoral PL and AM bundles were marked with a K-wire and cut from the femoral insertion site. Next, each bundle was divided at the tibial side, and the center of each AM and PL tibial insertion was again marked with a K-wire. Tunnel placement was evaluated using a C-arm radiographic device. For the femoral side assessment, Bernard and Hertel's technique was used. For the tibial side assessment, Staubli's technique was used. After radiographic evaluations, all tibias' soft tissues were removed with a 10% NaOH solution, and tunnel placements were evaluated. In the radiographic evaluation, the center of the femoral AM tunnel was placed at 15% in a shallow-deep direction and at 26% in a high-low direction. The center of the PL bundle was found at 32% in a shallow-deep direction and 52% in a high-low direction. On the tibial side, the center of the AM tunnel was placed at 31% from the anterior edge of the tibia, and the PL tunnel at 50%. The ACL tibial footprint was placed close to the center of the tibia and was oriented sagittally. AM and PL tunnels can be placed in the ACL insertions without any coalition. The native ACL insertion site has morphological variety in both the femoral and tibial sides. This study showed, anatomically and radiologically, the AM and PL tunnel positions in an anatomical ACL reconstruction. We believe that this study will contribute to an accurate tunnel placement during ACL reconstruction surgery and provide reference data for postoperative radiographic evaluation.

Surgeons can perform the anatomical double-bundle ACL, anatomical single-bundle, and nonanatomical tibial PL-femoral high AM reconstructions as impingement-free reconstructions.

The adductor tubercle was clearly identified as an osseous landmark. The femoral insertion of the MPFL was approximately 10 mm distal to the adductor tubercle. These findings may improve understanding of the anatomy of the femoral insertion of the MPFL and may assist surgeons in performing anatomical reconstruction.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft impingement against the intercondylar roof has been postulated, but not thoroughly investigated. The roof impingement pressure changes with different tibial and femoral tunnel positions in ACL reconstruction. Anterior tibial translation is also affected by the tunnel positions of ACL reconstruction. The study design included a controlled laboratory study. In 15 pig knees, the impingement pressure between ACL and intercondylar roof was measured using pressure sensitive film before and after ACL single bundle reconstruction. ACL reconstructions were performed in each knee with two different tibial and femoral tunnel position combinations: (1) tibial antero-medial (AM) tunnel to femoral AM tunnel (AM to AM) and (2) tibial postero-lateral (PL) tunnel to femoral High-AM tunnel (PL to High-AM). Anterior tibial translation (ATT) was evaluated after each ACL reconstruction using robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. Neither the AM to AM nor the PL to High-AM ACL reconstruction groups showed significant difference when compared with intact ACL in roof impingement pressure. The AM to AM group had a significantly higher failure load than PL to High-AM group. This study showed how different tunnel placements affect the ACL-roof impingement pressure and anterior-posterior laxity in ACL reconstruction. Anatomical ACL reconstruction does not cause roof impingement and it has a biomechanical advantage in ATT when compared with non-anatomical ACL reconstructions in the pig knee. There is no intercondylar roof impingement after anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction.

The tibial insertion site of the posterior cruciate ligament and its bundles is very complex. However, the shapes and positions of the insertion sites of the two bundles are consistent in that they are located in different planes on the posterior intercondylar fossa. We noted a consistent change in slope between the tibial insertion sites of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles.