TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractFactors and mechanisms leading to sanding are described within an integrated rock and soil mechanics framework. While the conventional sanding models generally consider a single-mechanism for sanding, namely the critical depletion resulting in rock disaggregation, the proposed approach considers the inter-play of several mechanisms that can lead to the rock break-up and sand transport. One important difference is that rock disaggregation is not seen to represent the onset of sanding as the sand mass can offer significant resistance due to frictional properties, interlocking of sand grains and arching. The approach presented can be used to explain why sanding in the field tends to be episodic and how depletion, which is a major factor in rock break-up, can be highly effective in holding broken up sand grains together and become a sand stabilization agent.The proposed approach is used in discussing sanding at several wells in two different fields. These wells have been in production for several years and show that sanding cannot be linked to just one unique mechanism (e.g., depletion). However, once all mechanisms for sanding are incorporated, a more consistent analysis can be used by completion and production engineers to make more objective and pragmatic decisions in managing sanding while maximizing production over the life of the well.
This paper describes the theory of cased hole formation resistivity measurements and presents examples demonstrating the diversity of their use. Resistivity behind casing has many applications, from evaluating formations in new wells to monitoring water influx and bypassed hydrocarbons in producing wells. These robust deep-resistivity measurements can be combined with data from traditional cased hole and openhole evaluation tools to provide a comprehensive formation evaluation from behind casing. Example A highlights the use of these measurements in the successful completion of a new Cook Inlet offshore well. Traditional openhole logs were not obtained because of hole conditions and the borehole environment, which also limited traditional cased hole evaluation techniques such as sigma and carbon-oxygen logging. The new resistivity measurements were instrumental to the successful completion of this well as an oil producer with low water cut. Examples B and C, from wells in a mature field, demonstrate the use of the measurements to identify water influx and encroachment, which is vital for reservoir monitoring. Both wells produced water from high-permeability thief zones, which prompted profile modification to limit water production and enhance off-take from zones with lower permeability. The new cased hole resistivity measurements provided valuable data, not available from traditional production logs, to assess sweep efficiency, which will be used to guide recompletion or sidetrack decisions. Introduction Traditional openhole formation evaluation techniques use resistivity or nuclear measurements to identify the location of hydrocarbons within the formations penetrated by the drill bit. In the past, once casing had been set in a well, formation evaluation and monitoring have been restricted to nuclear measurements because it was impossible to measure formation resistivity behind metal casing. Recent advances in electronics and electrode design now allow formation resistivity measurements to be made behind metal casing that can be used for both primary evaluation and reservoir monitoring. The ability to measure resistivity behind casing complements traditional cased hole nuclear evaluation techniques by providing valuable data in low-porosity environments and with greater depth of investigation than previously available. Direct resistivity measurements are also valuable for time-lapse monitoring of reservoir depletion. Three examples of the application of formation resistivity behind casing will be presented from wells located in Alaska. Example A demonstrates the application of measurements from the CHFR* Cased Hole Formation Resistivity tool to new well formation evaluation. In this well, openhole resistivity measurements were not available because hole conditions and formation conditions limited the use of traditional nuclear techniques. Examples B and C demonstrate the application of CHFR measurements to reservoir monitoring in a mature field through comparisons to previous resistivity and water saturation (Sw) results. CHFR Measurement Theory The theoretical basis for resistivity measurements behind casing has been known for a long time, having been patented in 19391. Practically, however, this measurement has not been available until recently because of the large resistivity contrast between metal casing and typical formation materials. The resistivity of metal casing is approximately 2×10-7 ohm-m, while typical formation resistivity ranges from 1 ohm-m to 100 ohm-m2. That contrast is approximately seven orders of magnitude. To measure this large contrast, voltage measurements in the nanovolt range are necessary. This capability has only recently been possible with advances in tool electronics and electrode design.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.