No abstract

No abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

No abstract

Molnupiravir is an orally acting novel small-molecule prodrug that acts against Covid-19 by inducing viral mutations to a threshold beyond which it cannot replicate. In a small, double-blind, dose-escalation, trial in non-hospitalized adults with mild/moderate Covid-19 with symptom onset less than 7 days before trial randomization, molnupiravir had with no apparent dose-related effect on adverse events or laboratory tests in relation to dose or treatment. Of the participants receiving molnupiravir 3.1% were hospitalized or died compared with 5.4% treated with placebo.

The TAF arm had significantly improved renal and bone safety parameters: less proteinuria and less change in hip and spine BMD, consistent with results from a similarly designed study of the elvitegravir/C/F/TAF STR. This D/C/F/TAF STR offers a promising option for initial HIV treatment, with the high barrier to resistance of darunavir, and the potential for improved long-term renal and bone safety with TAF.

BackgroundCobicistat is an alternative pharmacoenhancer to ritonavir. In healthy volunteers, darunavir exposure was comparable when darunavir 800 mg once daily was co-administered with cobicistat 150 mg once daily (as single agents or a fixed-dose combination) vs. with ritonavir 100 mg once daily.MethodsThis 48-week, Phase IIIb, single-arm, US multicenter study (NCT01440569) evaluated safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of darunavir/cobicistat 800/150 mg once daily (as single agents) plus two investigator-selected nucleoside/tide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N[t]RTIs) in HIV-1-infected adults. Patients had no darunavir resistance-associated mutations (RAMs), plasma viral load (VL) ≥1000 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml, eGFR ≥80 ml/min and genotypic sensitivity to the two N[t]RTIs. The primary endpoint was any treatment-emergent grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) through Week 24.ResultsThe majority of the 313 intent-to-treat patients were treatment-naïve (295/313; 94%), male (89%), White (60%) and received a tenofovir-based regimen (99%). Median baseline VL and CD4+ count overall were 4.8 log10 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml and 361 cells/mm3, respectively. Overall, 86% of patients (268/313) completed the study. The majority of discontinuations were for AEs (15/313; 5%). The incidence of treatment-emergent grade 3 or 4 AEs regardless of causality was 6% through Week 24 and 8% through Week 48. Most common AEs through Week 48 were diarrhea (27%) and nausea (23%), which were grade 1 or 2 in severity. Week 48 virologic response rates (% with VL <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml; Snapshot analysis) were 81% overall and 83% in treatment-naïve patients; median increases in CD4+ count at 48 weeks were 167 and 169 cells/mm3, respectively. Of 15/313 patients who met the criteria for resistance analysis, one developed a darunavir RAM as a mixture with wild-type (I84I/V), without phenotypic resistance to darunavir. The mean population pharmacokinetic-derived darunavir areas under the plasma concentration–time curve were 102,000 overall and 100,620 ng•h/ml in treatment-naïve patients. No clinically relevant relationships were seen between darunavir exposure and virologic response, AEs or laboratory parameters.ConclusionDarunavir/cobicistat 800/150 mg once daily was generally well tolerated through Week 48, with no new safety concerns. Pharmacokinetics, virologic and immunologic responses for darunavir/cobicistat were similar to previous data for darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily.

The Centers for Disease Control recommends that, because of a greatly increased susceptibility to pneumococcal infection, all persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) receive pneumococcal vaccine. Using an ELISA specific for antibody to capsular polysaccharide, a postvaccination antibody was evaluated to five commonly infecting serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Thirty-nine HIV-infected persons with less than or equal to 500 CD4 cells exhibited significantly fewer responses than did healthy controls; overall, only 46 (24%) of 195 possible responses were positive compared with 45 (75%) of 60 in 12 HIV-infected subjects with greater than 500 CD4 cells and 92 (74%) of 125 in 25 healthy controls (P less than .001). Subjects with less than or equal to 500 CD4 cells responded to a mean of 1.1 antigens versus a mean of 3.8 and 3.7 in those with greater than 500 CD4 cells and controls, respectively (P less than .001). There were no differences between responses in those with less than 200 and those with 200-500 CD4 cells. Within groups stratified by CD4 cell counts, further stratification by clinical status did not reveal significant differences. Since asymptomatic HIV-infected persons with less than 500 CD4 cells show abnormal responses, pneumococcal vaccine should be given when HIV infection is first detected.