Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for peak oxygen uptake (Vo(2peak)) can evaluate prognosis in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients, with the peak respiratory exchange ratio (RER(peak)) commonly used to confirm maximal effort and maximal oxygen uptake (Vo(2max)). We determined the precision of RER(peak) in confirming Vo(2max), and whether a novel ramp-incremental (RI) step-exercise (SE) (RISE) test could better determine Vo(2max) in CHF. Male CHF patients (n = 24; NYHA class I-III) performed a symptom-limited RISE-95 cycle ergometer test in the format: RI (4-18 W/min; ∼10 min); 5 min recovery (10 W); SE (95% peak RI work rate). Patients (n = 18) then performed RISE-95 tests using slow (3-8 W/min; ∼15 min) and fast (10-30 W/min; ∼6 min) ramp rates. Pulmonary gas exchange was measured breath-by-breath. Vo(2peak) was compared within patients by unpaired t-test of the highest 12 breaths during RI and SE phases to confirm Vo(2max) and its 95% confidence limits (CI(95)). RER(peak) was significantly influenced by ramp rate (fast, medium, slow: 1.21 ± 0.1 vs. 1.15 ± 0.1 vs. 1.09 ± 0.1; P = 0.001), unlike Vo(2peak) (mean n = 18; 14.4 ± 2.6 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1); P = 0.476). Group Vo(2peak) was similar between RI and SE (n = 24; 14.5 ± 3.0 vs. 14.7 ± 3.1 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1); P = 0.407); however, within-subject comparisons confirmed Vo(2max) in only 14 of 24 patients (CI(95) for Vo(2max) estimation averaged 1.4 ± 0.8 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)). The RER(peak) in CHF was significantly influenced by ramp rate, suggesting its use to determine maximal effort and Vo(2max) be abandoned. In contrast, the RISE-95 test had high precision for Vo(2max) confirmation with patient-specific CI(95) (without secondary criteria), and showed that Vo(2max) is commonly underestimated in CHF. The RISE-95 test was well tolerated by CHF patients, supporting its use for Vo(2max) confirmation.

AimsTo test the ability of four circulating biomarkers of fibrosis, and of low left atrial voltage, to predict recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation.BackgroundCirculating biomarkers potentially may be used to improve patient selection for atrial fibrillation ablation. Low voltage areas in the left atrium predict arrhythmia recurrence when mapped in sinus rhythm. This study tested type III procollagen N terminal peptide (PIIINP), galectin-3 (gal-3), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23), and type I collagen C terminal telopeptide (ICTP), and whether low voltage areas in the left atrium predicted atrial fibrillation recurrence, irrespective of the rhythm during mapping.Methods92 atrial fibrillation ablation patients were studied. Biomarker levels in peripheral and intra-cardiac blood were measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Low voltage (<0.5mV) was expressed as a proportion of the mapped left atrial surface area. Follow-up was one year. The primary endpoint was recurrence of arrhythmia. The secondary endpoint was a composite of recurrence despite two procedures, or after one procedure if no second procedure was undertaken.ResultsThe biomarkers were not predictive of either endpoint. After multivariate Cox regression analysis, high proportion of low voltage area in the left atrium was found to predict the primary endpoint in sinus rhythm mapping (hazard ratio 4.323, 95% confidence interval 1.337–13.982, p = 0.014) and atrial fibrillation mapping (hazard ratio 5.195, 95% confidence interval 1.032–26.141, p = 0.046). This effect was also apparent for the secondary endpoint.ConclusionThe studied biomarkers do not predict arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation. Left atrial voltage is an independent predictor of recurrence, whether the left atrium is mapped in atrial fibrillation or sinus rhythm.

No abstract

BackgroundThere is increasing desire among service commissioners to treat arrhythmia in primary care. Accurate interpretation of the electrocardiogram (ECG) is fundamental to this. ECG interpretation has previously been shown to vary widely but there is little recent data.AimTo examine the interpretation of ECGs in primary and secondary care.Design and settingA cross-sectional survey of participants’ interpretation of six ECGs and hypothetical management of patients based on those ECGs, at primary care educational events, and a cardiology department in Leeds.MethodA total of 262 primary care clinicians and 20 cardiology clinicians were surveyed via questionnaire. Answers were compared with expert electrophysiologist opinion.ResultsIn primary care, abnormal ECGs were interpreted as normal by 23% of responders. ST elevation and prolonged QT were incorrectly interpreted as normal by 1% and 22%, respectively. In cardiology, abnormal ECGs were interpreted as normal by 3%.ConclusionECG provision and interpretation remains inconsistent in both primary and secondary care. Primary care practitioners are less experienced and less confident with ECG interpretation than cardiologists, and require support in this area.

It is feasible to map the entire left atrium for AVD-GPs before AF ablation. Aggregated data from multiple patients, producing a distribution probability atlas of AVD-GPs, identified three regions with a higher likelihood for finding AVD-GPs and these matched the histological descriptions. This approach could be used to better characterize the autonomic network.

Introduction Electrical coupling index (ECI) and contact force (CF) have been developed to aid lesion formation during catheter ablation. ECI measures tissue impedance and capacitance whilst CF measures direct contact. The aim was to determine whether the presence of catheter / tissue interaction information, such as ECI and CF, reduce time to achieve bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus block during atrial flutter (AFL) ablation. Methods Patients with paroxysmal or persistent AFL were randomised to CF visible (range 5-40g), CF not visible, ECI visible (change of 12%) or ECI not visible. Follow-up occurred at 3 and 6 months and included a 7 day ECG recording. The primary endpoint was time to bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus block. Results 114 patients were randomised, 16 were excluded. Time to bidirectional block was significantly shorter when ECI was visible (median 30.0 mins (IQR 31) to median 10.5mins (IQR 12) p 0.023) versus ECI not visible. There was a trend towards a shorter time to bidirectional block when CF was visible. Higher force was applied when CF was visible (median 9.03g (IQR 7.4) vs. 11.3g (5.5) p 0.017). There was no difference in the acute recurrence of conduction between groups. The complication rate was 2%, AFL recurrence was 1.1% and at 6 month follow-up, 12% had atrial fibrillation. Conclusion The use of tissue contact information during AFL ablation was associated with reduced time taken to achieve bidirectional block when ECI was visible. Contact force data improved contact when visible with a trend towards a reduction in the procedural endpoint. ClinicalTrials.gov trial identifier: NCT02490033 .

Rhythm control of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains challenging, with modest long term success rates. Atrial fibrosis has been associated with AF, but the clinical utility of assessment of this fibrosis has yet to be fully elucidated. In this paper we review the current state of understanding of the pathophysiology of atrial fibrosis in AF, and its impact upon the instigation and propagation of the arrhythmia. Fibrosis causes an increase in volume of dysfunctional extracellular matrix, and is associated with cellular alterations such as hypertrophy, apoptosis and membrane dysfunction within the atrial myocardium. In turn, these cause pathological alterations to atrial conduction, such as increased anisotropy, conduction block and re-entry, which can lead to AF. We review current methods of assessing atrial fibrosis and their impact upon the prediction of success of interventional rhythm control strategies such as ablation and cardioversion. We focus particularly on circulating biomarkers of fibrosis and scar formation; their role in the fibrotic process, and their value in the prediction of rhythm control success. We also review imaging and invasive electrocardiographic mapping techniques that may identify fibrosis, and again assess their potential predictive value. In this area there exist many unanswered questions, but further work will help to refine techniques to reliably identify and treat those patients who are most likely to benefit from rhythm control treatment strategies.3

The early repolarization (ER) pattern on the 12-lead electrocardiogram is characterized by J point elevation in the inferior and/or lateral leads. The ER pattern is associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Based on studies in animal models and genetic studies, it has been proposed that J point elevation in ER is a manifestation of augmented dispersion of repolarization which creates a substrate for ventricular arrhythmia. A competing theory regarding early repolarization syndrome (ERS) proposes that the syndrome arises as a consequence of abnormal depolarization. In recent years, multiple clinical studies have described the characteristics of ER patients with VF in more detail. The majority of these studies have provided evidence to support basic science observations. However, not all clinical observations correlate with basic science findings. This review will provide an overview of basic science and genetic research in ER and correlate basic science evidence with the clinical phenotype.