BackgroundIn many countries, rates of facility-based childbirth have increased substantially in recent years. However, insufficient attention has been paid to the acceptability and quality of maternal health services provided at facilities and, consequently, maternal health outcomes have not improved as expected. Disrespect and abuse during childbirth is increasingly being recognized as an indicator of overall poor quality of care and as a key barrier to achieving improved maternal health outcomes, but little evidence exists to describe the scope and magnitude of this problem, particularly in urban areas in low-income countries.MethodsThis paper presents findings from an assessment of the prevalence of disrespectful and abusive behaviors during facility-based childbirth in one large referral hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Client reports of disrespect and abuse (D&A) were obtained through postpartum interviews immediately before discharge from the facility with 1914 systematically sampled women and from community follow-up interviews with 64 women four to six weeks post-delivery. Additionally, 197 direct observations of the labor, delivery, and postpartum period were conducted to document specific incidences of disrespect and abuse during labor and delivery, which we compared with women’s reports.ResultsDuring postpartum interviews, 15 % of women reported experiencing at least one instance of D&A. This number was dramatically higher during community follow-up interviews, in which 70 % of women reported any experience of D&A. During postpartum interviews, the most common forms of D&A reported were abandonment (8 %), non-dignified care (6 %), and physical abuse (5 %), while reporting for all categories of D&A, excluding detention and non consented care, was above 50 % during community follow-up interviews. Evidence from direct observations of client-provider interactions during labor and delivery confirmed high rates of some disrespectful and abusive behaviors.ConclusionsThis study is one of the first to quantify the prevalence of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth in a large public hospital in an urban setting. The difference in respondent reports between the two time periods is striking, and more research is needed to determine the most appropriate methodologies for measuring this phenomenon. The levels and types of disrespect and abuse reported here represent fundamental violations of women’s human rights and are symptomatic of failing health systems. Action is urgently needed to ensure acceptable, quality, and dignified care for all women.

BackgroundThere is emerging evidence that disrespect and abuse (D&A) during facility-based childbirth is prevalent in countries throughout the world and a barrier to achieving good maternal health outcomes. However, much work remains in the identification of effective interventions to prevent and eliminate D&A during facility-based childbirth. This paper describes an exploratory study conducted in a large referral hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania that sought to measure D&A, introduce a package of interventions to reduce its incidence, and evaluate their effectiveness.MethodsAfter extensive consultation with critical constituencies, two discrete interventions were implemented: (1) Open Birth Days (OBD), a birth preparedness and antenatal care education program, and (2) a workshop for healthcare providers based on the Health Workers for Change curriculum. Each intervention was designed to increase knowledge of patient rights and birth preparedness; increase and improve patient-provider and provider-administrator communication; and improve women’s experience and provider attitudes. The effects of the interventions were assessed using a pre-post design and a range of tools: pre-post questionnaires for OBD participants and pre-post questionnaires for workshop participants; structured interviews with healthcare providers and administrators; structured interviews with women who gave birth at the study facility; and direct observations of patient-provider interactions during labor and delivery.ResultsComparisons before and after the interventions showed an increase in patient and provider knowledge of user rights across multiple dimensions, as well as women’s knowledge of the labor and delivery process. Women reported feeling better prepared for delivery and provider attitudes towards them improved, with providers reporting higher levels of empathy for the women they serve and better interpersonal relationships. Patients and providers reported improved communication, which direct observations confirmed. Additionally, women reported feeling more empowered and confident during delivery. Provider job satisfaction increased substantially from baseline levels, as did user reports of satisfaction and perceptions of care quality.ConclusionsCollectively, the outcomes of this study indicate that the tested interventions have the potential to be successful in promoting outcomes that are prerequisite to reducing disrespect and abuse. However, a more rigorous evaluation is needed to determine the full impact of these interventions.

As UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets for people living with HIV are increasingly being reached in many contexts, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), the "fourth 90", warrants special attention. HIV-related stigma and discrimination remain major barriers for overall HRQoL despite impressive clinical and virological improvements in HIV care. We reviewed original publications examining the impact of interventions to reduce stigma as experienced by people living with HIV in all income settings between 2010-2018. Our search identified a lack of welldesigned intervention studies that documented stigma reduction and few studies that specifically assessed the impact of stigma on HRQoL. Further, few interventions targeted discrimination from providers outside HIV-specific care or involved people living with HIV in both the design and implementation. Lastly, evidence on methods to reduce stigma among several underrepresented key populations and geographic regions was limited and research on intersectional stigma, i.e. the convergence of multiple stigmatized identities, needs further attention.

Introduction:HIV-related stigma and discrimination and disrespect and abuse during childbirth are barriers to use of essential maternal and HIV health services. Greater understanding of the relationship between HIV status and disrespect and abuse during childbirth is required to design interventions to promote women's rights and to increase uptake of and retention in health services; however, few comparative studies of women living with HIV (WLWH) and HIV-negative women exist.Methods:Mixed methods included interviews with postpartum women (n = 2000), direct observation during childbirth (n = 208), structured questionnaires (n = 50), and in-depth interviews (n = 18) with health care providers. Bivariate and multivariate regressions analyzed associations between HIV status and disrespect and abuse, whereas questionnaires and in-depth interviews provided insight into how provider attitudes and workplace culture influence practice.Results:Of the WLWH and HIV-negative women, 12.2% and 15.0% reported experiencing disrespect and abuse during childbirth (P = 0.37), respectively. In adjusted analyses, no significant differences between WLWH and HIV-negative women's experiences of different types of disrespect and abuse were identified, with the exception of WLWH having greater odds of reporting non-consented care (P = 0.03). None of the WLWH reported violations of HIV confidentiality or attributed disrespect and abuse to their HIV status. Provider interviews indicated that training and supervision focused on prevention of vertical HIV transmission had contributed to changing the institutional culture and reducing HIV-related violations.Conclusions:In general, WLWH were not more likely to report disrespect and abuse during childbirth than HIV-negative women. However, the high overall prevalence of disrespect and abuse measured indicates a serious problem. Similar institutional priority as has been given to training and supervision to reduce HIV-related discrimination during childbirth should be focused on ensuring respectful maternity care for all women.

Peer support services are increasingly being integrated in programmes for the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT). We aimed to evaluate the effect of a peer-mother interactive programme on PMTCT outcomes among pregnant women on anti-retroviral treatment (ART) in routine healthcare in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Twenty-three health facilities were cluster-randomized to a peer-mother intervention and 24 to a control arm. We trained 92 ART experienced women with HIV to offer peer education, adherence and psychosocial support to women enrolling in PMTCT care at the intervention facilities. All pregnant women who enrolled in PMTCT care at the 47 facilities from 1st January 2018 to 31st December 2019 were identified and followed up to 31st July 2021. The primary outcome was time to ART attrition (no show >90 days since the scheduled appointment, excluding transfers) and any difference in one-year retention in PMTCT and ART care between intervention and control facilities. Secondary outcomes were maternal viral suppression (<400 viral copies/mL) and mother-to-child HIV transmission (MTCT) by ≥12 months post-partum. Analyses were done using Kaplan Meier and Cox regression (ART retention/attrition), generalized estimating equations (viral suppression) and random effects logistic regression (MTCT); reporting rates, proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CI). There were 1957 women in the peer-mother and 1384 in the control facilities who enrolled in routine PMTCT care during 2018–2019 and were followed for a median [interquartile range (IQR)] of 23 [10, 31] months. Women in both groups had similar median age of 30 [IQR 25, 35] years, but differed slightly with regard to proportions in the third pregnancy trimester (14% versus 19%); advanced HIV (22% versus 27%); and ART naïve (55% versus 47%). Peer-mother facilities had a significantly lower attrition rate per 1000 person months (95%CI) of 14 (13, 16) versus 18 (16, 19) and significantly higher one-year ART retention (95%CI) of 78% (76, 80) versus 74% (71, 76) in un-adjusted analyses, however in adjusted analyses the effect size was not statistically significant [adjusted hazard ratio of attrition (95%CI) = 0.85 (0.67, 1.08)]. Viral suppression (95%CI) was similar in both groups [92% (91, 93) versus 91% (90, 92)], but significantly higher among ART naïve women in peer-mother [91% (89, 92)] versus control [88% (86, 90)] facilities. MTCT (95%CI) was similar in both groups [2.2% (1.4, 3.4) versus 1.5% (0.7, 2.8)]. In conclusion, we learned that integration of peer-mother services in routine PMTCT care improved ART retention among all women and viral suppression among ART naïve women but had no significant influence on MTCT.