Introduction: This study performs optical aberration assessment in patients using a novel ultra-high-resolution device. The objective of this study is to analyze optical aberrations, especially the very high order wavefront (more than 10th order of Zernike coefficients), and compare between keratoconus and healthy patients. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed 43 eyes from 25 healthy patients and 43 eyes from 27 patients with keratoconus using corneal tomography and a very high-resolution (8.55 lm) aberrometer prototype (T-eyede) outfitted with a sensor originally developed for use in the field of astrophysics. Corneal aberration values were assessed using an optical model built with Zemax optical software, while ocular aberrations were assessed using T-eyede. In addition, image-processing analysis was performed of the wavefront phase, creating a highpass filter map. Results: We found lower values for ocular aberrations than corneal aberrations in both groups (p \ 0.001). Specifically, we found a reduction in primary astigmatism (0.145 lm) and primary coma (0.017 lm). Also, the keratoconus group showed significantly higher wavefront aberration values compared with controls (p \ 0.001). An analysis of the highpass filter map revealed 2 contrasting results: one smooth or clear, while the other presented a banding pattern. Almost all in the control group (95%) showed the first pattern, while 77% of the keratoconus group showed a banding pattern on the filtered map (chi-squared test, p \ 0.001). Conclusion: This device provides reliable, precise measurements of ocular aberrations that correlate well with corneal aberrations. Furthermore, the extraordinary high-resolution measurements revealed unprecedented micro changes in the wavefront phase of patients with keratoconus that varied with disease stage. These findings could lead to new screening or follow-up methods.

The aims of this study were to calculate the specific risk of opacification for different intraocular lens (IOL) models and to determine whether differences exist, even between lenses made of similar acrylic materials.Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent endothelial keratoplasty (EK), either after or in conjunction with cataract surgery, from June 2009 to October 2020 at Fundación Jiménez Díaz Hospital.Results: Three hundred seventy-two eyes of 308 patients with a median follow-up of 856 days [interquartile range (IQR): 384-1570] were included, of which 128 IOLs were hydrophobic, 120 hydrophilic, and 124 unknown. 12.9% of IOLs opacified after a median of 466 days (IQR: 255-743). Visual acuity (VA) was significantly lower in the opacified IOL group [0.51 (IQR: 0.36-1.13)] compared with the nonopacified group [0.22 (IQR: 0.11-0.65)] (P , 0.001). IOL explantation and exchange was performed in 10 eyes, in which VA improved markedly, from 1.75 (IQR: 0.99-3.00) to 0.60 (IQR: 0.36-0.86) (P = 0.004). IOL material and opacification events were not independent (P , 0.001). Significant differences were found between the Akreos ADAPT AO and MI60P models and the Asphina 409M model (P = 0.022). No significant differences were found in the opacification ratio for hydrophilic IOLs in the clinical diagnosis (P = 0.11), the type of EK (P = 0.25), the rebubbling rate (P = 0.44), or the tamponade used (P = 0.36).Conclusions: Hydrophilic lenses should be avoided in patients at risk of requiring EK. It is important to know the probability of opacification of each IOL model to balance risk and benefits when planning an EK procedure because not all lenses opacify equally. Opacification is an unwanted event with a negative impact on VA, making IOL explantation and exchange the only viable treatment, although one that is not without risks.