Social cohesion' as used in this paragraph follows the terminology of international organizations. Recent sociological literature keeps the expression 'social solidarity' in reference to Durkheim´s original work and reserves the term social cohesion for present definitions. Jamaat et al. (2009) argue that 'social cohesion' has been used in the Anglo-Saxon literature as a translation for the French solidarité social. Meanwhile, in the philosophical literature, critical theory refers to solidarity in very close association to Durkheim and the sociological tradition, and thus in very close connection to social cohesion, whereas in pure ethical reflection, solidarity is understood as a disposition to reciprocal or asymmetrical aid to others. In the latter case, cohesion results from an individual or social ethical virtue.

No abstract

We assess the recent evolution of the quality of life in Uruguay, analysing whether current subjective well-being levels are conditioned by the objective well-being trajectory of each individual. We explore subjective well-being in three domains: life, economic situation and housing satisfaction. Although adaptation has been addressed in the empirical literature for developed countries, there is scarce evidence for developing countries due to the lack of suitable panel datasets. In this article, we provide an econometric test of the adaptation hypothesis based on longitudinal data from Uruguay for the years 2004, 2006 and 2011/12 (Estudio Longitudinal de Bienestar en Uruguay). Our main findings show that present levels of life, economic and housing satisfaction are each positively correlated with the corresponding contemporary and lagged objective variable of interest. Thus, we reject the adaptation hypothesis in all the dimensions considered. We also explore the role of social interactions in the three subjective wellbeing dimensions. Average objective well-being of the reference group (either income or crowding) is not associated with individual subjective well-being levels. However, life satisfaction is positively correlated with the average subjective well-being of the reference group.

We estimate the enforcement level of conditionalities of two transfer programs and how they affect teenagers' time use, in particular, their school attendance, labor supply, and home production. We develop a structural discrete choice model in which young individuals and their parents decide how to allocate their time, including the decision of whether to attend school. They also choose how many hours to work in the market, time in home production, and leisure. To estimate the model, we use household panel data which combines administrative records and surveys covering the period of 2005-2012 in Uruguay, during which two consecutive CCT programs were introduced with different designs. Our model captures not only the share of individuals who are in fact in studies, working and those who neither study nor work, but also the share and the number of hours in market work and home production, and the GPA distribution. The policy experiments performed indicate that school attendance can be increased by raising the level of enforcement and by changing who in the household receives the cash transfer from the parents to the teenagers.

We explore whether preferences for redistributive policies are transmitted from parents to children and study the empirical relevance of three modulators suggested by theoretical models: family income mobility, personality traits of parents, and the abilities of their children. We draw on a novel and rich dataset, the Longitudinal Study of Well-being in Uruguay, which contains information on parents' preferences for redistribution in the years 2011/12 and 2015/16 and their children's preferences in the year 2015/16. Firstly, we find that, on average, the intergenerational persistence of redistributive preferences is relatively high. Secondly, there is heterogeneity in the intergenerational transmission process associated with parents' learning. Finally, the intergenerational transmission of preferences is more relevant when intergenerational mobility is lower, parents have greater self-control, and children present higher abilities. JEL Code: D31, D64, H23