Avoidance behaviour is a hallmark of anxiety disorders and OCD, yet there is a pressing need to understand how extinction of avoidance responses proceeds and what variables if any determine recovery from extinction. In this study, we used a within-subjects design in which participants learned to avoid a loud noise signalled by two discrete visual stimuli (CSs+), by pressing the space bar in the computer keyboard. We trained each CS+ along with a CS- in a different context. During extinction, CSs+ and CSs- stimuli were presented in the alternative context from that of training , and participants were allowed to freely respond, but no loud noise was presented. Finally, all CSs were tested in both contexts, resulting in a within-subjects ABA vs ABB comparison. Participants increased avoidance responses over training, and decreased responding during extinction. During test, responding was significantly higher when CS+ stimuli were tested in the training vs the extinction context, thus showing renewal of instrumental avoidance in humans. Additional analyses revealed substantial individual differences in this task. This study shows renewal of instrumental avoidance in humans, and the design can shed light on ways of making extinction more durable.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.