Background and ObjectivesMounting evidence implies that there are sex differences in white matter hyperintensity (WMH) burden in older people. Questions remain regarding possible differences in WMH burden between men and women of younger age, sex-specific age trajectories and effects of (un)controlled hypertension, and the effect of menopause on WMH. Therefore, our aim was to investigate these sex differences and age dependencies in WMH load across the adult life span and to examine the effect of menopause.MethodsThis cross-sectional analysis was based on participants of the population-based Rhineland Study (30–95 years) who underwent brain MRI. We automatically quantified WMH using T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images. Menopausal status was self-reported. We examined associations of sex and menopause with WMH load (logit-transformed and z-standardized) using linear regression models while adjusting for age, age-squared, and vascular risk factors. We checked for an age × sex and (un)controlled hypertension × sex interaction and stratified for menopausal status comparing men with premenopausal women (persons aged 59 years or younger), men with postmenopausal women (persons aged 45 years or older), and premenopausal with postmenopausal women (age range 45–59 years).ResultsOf 3,410 participants with a mean age of 54.3 years (SD = 13.7), 1,973 (57.9%) were women, of which 1,167 (59.1%) were postmenopausal. We found that the increase in WMH load accelerates with age and in a sex-dependent way. Premenopausal women and men of similar age did not differ in WMH burden. WMH burden was higher and accelerated faster in postmenopausal women compared with men of similar age. In addition, we observed changes related to menopause, in that postmenopausal women had more WMH than premenopausal women of similar age. Women with uncontrolled hypertension had a higher WMH burden compared with men, which was unrelated to menopausal status.DiscussionAfter menopause, women displayed a higher burden of WMH than contemporary premenopausal women and men and an accelerated increase in WMH. Sex-specific effects of uncontrolled hypertension on WMH were not related to menopause. Further studies are warranted to investigate menopause-related physiologic changes that may inform on causal mechanisms involved in cerebral small vessel disease progression.
Individuals with a similar chronological age can exhibit marked differences in cardiovascular risk profiles, but it is unknown whether this variation is related to different rates of biological aging. Therefore, we investigated the relation between nine domains of cardiovascular function and four epigenetic age acceleration estimators (i.e., AgeAccel.Horvath, AgeAccel.Hannum, AgeAccelPheno, and AgeAccelGrim), derived from DNA methylation profiles. Among 4194 participants (mean age 54.2 years (range 30.0–95.0)) from the Rhineland Study, an ongoing population-based cohort study in Bonn, Germany, epigenetic age acceleration increased by 0.19–1.84 years per standard deviation (SD) increase in cardiovascular risk across multiple domains, including measures of kidney function, adiposity, and a composite cardiovascular risk score. Measures of inflammation and glucose homeostasis were associated with AgeAccel.Hannum, AgeAccelPheno, and AgeAccelGrim, but not with AgeAccel.Horvath. Moreover, effect sizes were larger for AgeAccelPheno and AgeAccelGrim than for AgeAccel.Horvath and AgeAccel.Hannum. Similarly, epigenetic age acceleration increased by 0.15–0.81 years per SD increase in markers of vascular function (blood pressure, arterial stiffness, and hemodynamic measures), whereas better endothelial function was only associated with lower AgeAccelGrim. Most effects on epigenetic age acceleration were independent, which suggests they independently contribute to different rates of biological aging.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.