Water pollution through natural and anthropogenic activities has become a global problem causing short-and long-term impact on human and ecosystems. Substantial quantity of individual or mixtures of organic pollutants enter the surface water via point and nonpoint sources and thus affect the quality of freshwater. These pollutants are known to be toxic and difficult to remove by mere biological treatment. To date, most researches on the removal of organic pollutants from wastewater were based on the exploitation of individual treatment process. This single-treatment technology has inherent challenges and shortcomings with respect to efficiency and economics. Thus, application of two advanced treatment technologies characterized with high efficiency with respect to removal of primary and disinfection byproducts in wastewater is desirable. This review article focuses on the application of integrated technologies such as electrohydraulic discharge with heterogeneous photocatalysts or sonophotocatalysis to remove target pollutants. The information gathered from more than 100 published articles, mostly laboratories studies, shows that process integration effectively remove and degrade recalcitrant toxic contaminants in wastewater better than singletechnology processing. This review recommends an improvement on this technology (integrated electrohydraulic discharge with heterogeneous photocatalysts) viz-a-vis cost reduction in order to make it accessible and available in the rural and semi-urban settlement. Further recommendation includes development of an economic model to establish the cost implications of the combined technology. Proper monitoring, enforcement of the existing environmental regulations, and upgrading of current wastewater treatment plants with additional treatment steps such as photocatalysis and ozonation will greatly assist in the removal of environmental toxicants.

No abstract

No abstract

Recent studies have shown that a combination of coal fly ash (FA) and Al(OH) 3 can be used to treat neutral mine drainage (NMD) and reduce sulphate concentration to within South African drinking water quality levels, Class II (400-600 mg/L). The shortcomings of this method were the large amounts of FA required to raise the pH to greater than 11 (3:1 liquidto-solid ratio) so that Al(OH) 3 can be added to facilitate removal of sulphate ions through ettringite precipitation. This requires large silos to store FA, making upscaling of this treatment technology using normal mixing methods to be unrealistic. In the current study, a jet loop reactor was used to reduce the amount of FA needed to increase the pH to greater than 11. The pH was raised to greater than 11 by mixing 0.25 % of lime (w/v ratio) and 13 kg of coal FA with 80 L of NMD in a jet loop reactor. After the pH of the mixture was above 11, amorphous Al(OH) 3 (83.2 g) was added to the mixture. This resulted in the sulphate concentration decreasing to less than 500 mg/L. Bench-scale studies using 0.25 % (w/v) of lime and 6:1 coal mine water to FA ratio could not reduce the sulphate concentration to below 500 mg/L. Therefore, the impingement and cavitation mixing techniques that happen in a jet loop reactor played an important role in enhancing sulphate removal.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract