SUMMARY An essential feature of bacterial plasmids is their ability to replicate as autonomous genetic elements in a controlled way within the host. Therefore, they can be used to explore the mechanisms involved in DNA replication and to analyze the different strategies that couple DNA replication to other critical events in the cell cycle. In this review, we focus on replication and its control in circular plasmids. Plasmid replication can be conveniently divided into three stages: initiation, elongation, and termination. The inability of DNA polymerases to initiate de novo replication makes necessary the independent generation of a primer. This is solved, in circular plasmids, by two main strategies: (i) opening of the strands followed by RNA priming (theta and strand displacement replication) or (ii) cleavage of one of the DNA strands to generate a 3′-OH end (rolling-circle replication). Initiation is catalyzed most frequently by one or a few plasmid-encoded initiation proteins that recognize plasmid-specific DNA sequences and determine the point from which replication starts (the origin of replication). In some cases, these proteins also participate directly in the generation of the primer. These initiators can also play the role of pilot proteins that guide the assembly of the host replisome at the plasmid origin. Elongation of plasmid replication is carried out basically by DNA polymerase III holoenzyme (and, in some cases, by DNA polymerase I at an early stage), with the participation of other host proteins that form the replisome. Termination of replication has specific requirements and implications for reinitiation, studies of which have started. The initiation stage plays an additional role: it is the stage at which mechanisms controlling replication operate. The objective of this control is to maintain a fixed concentration of plasmid molecules in a growing bacterial population (duplication of the plasmid pool paced with duplication of the bacterial population). The molecules involved directly in this control can be (i) RNA (antisense RNA), (ii) DNA sequences (iterons), or (iii) antisense RNA and proteins acting in concert. The control elements maintain an average frequency of one plasmid replication per plasmid copy per cell cycle and can “sense” and correct deviations from this average. Most of the current knowledge on plasmid replication and its control is based on the results of analyses performed with pure cultures under steady-state growth conditions. This knowledge sets important parameters needed to understand the maintenance of these genetic elements in mixed populations and under environmental conditions.

The structure of the 45 amino acid transcriptional repressor, CopG, has been solved unliganded and bound to its target operator DNA. The protein, encoded by the promiscuous streptococcal plasmid pMV158, is involved in the control of plasmid copy number. The structure of this protein repressor, which is the shortest reported to date and the first isolated from a plasmid, has a homodimeric ribbon-helix-helix arrangement. It is the prototype for a family of homologous plasmid repressors. CopG cooperatively associates, completely protecting several turns on one face of the double helix in both directions from a 13-bp pseudosymmetric primary DNA recognition element. In the complex structure, one protein tetramer binds at one face of a 19-bp oligonucleotide, containing the pseudosymmetric element, with two beta-ribbons inserted into the major groove. The DNA is bent 60 degrees by compression of both major and minor grooves. The protein dimer displays topological similarity to Arc and MetJ repressors. Nevertheless, the functional tetramer has a unique structure with the two vicinal recognition ribbon elements at a short distance, thus inducing strong DNA bend. Further structural resemblance is found with helix-turn-helix regions of unrelated DNA-binding proteins. In contrast to these, however, the bihelical region of CopG has a role in oligomerization instead of DNA recognition. This observation unveils an evolutionary link between ribbon-helix-helix and helix-turn-helix proteins.

We have characterized a region in the streptococcal plasmid pLS1 located between nucleotides 4103 and 4218 which is a signal involved in the conversion of single stranded intermediates of replication to double stranded plasmid forms. This region has a large axis of dyad symmetry resulting in the formation of a secondary structure as revealed by the location of endonuclease S1-cleavage sites in supercoiled covalently closed circular pLS1 DNA. Deletions affecting this region caused a fivefold reduction in plasmid copy number, plasmid instability and the accumulation of single-stranded DNA intermediates. The conversion signal of pLS1 has homologues in other staphylococcal plasmids, sharing a consensus sequence located in the loop of the signal. Computer assisted analysis showed that the signal detected in pLS1 has a high degree of homology with the complementary strand origin of the Escherichia coli single stranded bacteriophages phi X174 and M13.

Rolling circle-replicating plasmids constitute a group of small, promiscuous multicopy replicons spread among eubacteria. Until recently, rolling circle replication seemed to be limited to small plasmids from Gram-positive hosts and to single-stranded bacteriophages from Gram-negative bacteria. However, characterization of two small plasmids from Gram-negative hosts has shown that this replication mechanism is general among eubacteria. This review focuses on a family of highly related promiscuous plasmids that replicate by the rolling circle mechanism, and that have been isolated from various Gram-positive bacteria and from the Gram-negative bacterium Helicobacter. They all share homologies at the leading-strand origins and at the initiator of replication proteins. The plasmids of this family have directly repeated sequences at their plus origin of replication, which is located 5' from the start point of the mRNA for the initiation of replication protein. Replication is controlled by an antisense RNA and by a transcriptional repressor protein. The features and regulatory circuits of replication of this plasmid family seem to be unique among rolling circle-replicating plasmids. Members of this family replicate autonomously in Gram-positive and -negative hosts.

Bacterial plasmids maintain their number of copies by negative regulatory systems that adjust the rate of replication per plasmid copy in response to fluctuations in the copy number. Three general classes of regulatory mechanisms have been studied in depth, namely those that involve directly repeated sequences (iterons), those that use only antisense RNAs and those that use a mechanism involving an antisense RNA in combination with a protein. The first class of control mechanism will not be discussed here. Within the second class (the most ‘classical’ one), exciting insights have been obtained on the molecular basis of the inhibition mechanism that prevents the formation of a long‐range RNA structure (pseudoknot), which is an example of an elegant solution reached by some replicons to control their copy number. Among the third class, it is possible to distinguish between (i) cases in which proteins play an auxiliary role; and (ii) cases in which transcriptional repressor proteins play a real regulatory role. This latter type of regulation is relatively new and seems to be widespread among plasmids from Gram‐positive bacteria, at least for the rolling circle‐replicating plasmids of the pMV158 family and the theta‐replicating plasmids of the Inc18 streptococcal family.

The promiscuous plasmid pLS1 encodes two transacting elements that regulate its copy number: protein RepA and antisense RNA II. In vitro transcription showed that RNAs for both repressors are synthesized from two promoters, PAB and PII. From PAB, genes encoding RepA (transcriptional repressor) and RepB (initiator of replication) are cotranscribed, the target of RepA being located within PAB. Mutants in repA or in PAB are still sensitive to RepA. However, cloning of the repA gene in a compatible replicon did not result in incompatibility towards pLS1. From PII, the 50-nucleotide RNA II is synthesized. The main incompatibility determinant towards pLS1 corresponds to the coding sequence for RNA II. The RNA II target could be reduced to 21 nucleotides, including the RepB initiation of translation signals. We propose that plasmids of the pLS1 family (pE194, pADB201, and pLB4) share functional and structural characteristics for the regulation of their copy numbers.

Two elements, the products of genes copG and rnaII, are involved in the copy-number control of plasmid pLS1. RNA II is synthesized in a dosage-dependent manner. Mutations in both components have been characterized. To determine the regulatory role of the two genes, we have cloned copG, rnaII or both elements at various gene dosages into pLS1-compatible plasmids. Assays of incompatibility towards wild-type or mutant pLS1 plasmids showed that: (i) the rnaII gene product, rather than the DNA sequence encoding it, is responsible for the incompatibility, and (ii) CopG and RNA II act in trans and are able to correct up fluctuations in pLS1 copy number. A correlation between the gene dosage at which the regulatory elements were supplied and the incompatibility effect on the resident plasmid was observed. The entire copG-rnaII circuit has a synergistic effect when compared with any of its components in the correction of pLS1 copy-number fluctuations, indicating that, in the homoplasmid steady-state situation, the control of pLS1 replication is exerted by the co-ordinate action of CopG and RNA II.

RepB initiates plasmid rolling-circle replication by binding to a triple 11-bp direct repeat (bind locus) and cleaving the DNA at a specific distant site located in a hairpin loop within the nic locus of the origin. The structure of native full-length RepB reveals a hexameric ring molecule, where each protomer has two domains. The origin-binding and catalytic domains show a three-layer a-b-a sandwich fold. The active site is positioned at one of the faces of the b-sheet and coordinates a Mn 2 þ ion at short distance from the essential nucleophilic Y99. The oligomerization domains (ODs), each consisting of four a-helices, together define a compact ring with a central channel, a feature found in ring helicases. The toroidal arrangement of RepB suggests that, similar to ring helicases, it encircles one of the DNA strands during replication to confer processivity to the replisome complex. The catalytic domains appear to be highly mobile with respect to ODs. This mobility may account for the adaptation of the protein to two distinct DNA recognition sites.