Even without weight loss, MD reduces liver steatosis and improves insulin sensitivity in an insulin-resistant population with NAFLD, compared to current dietary advice. This diet should be further investigated in subjects with NAFLD.

Metformin therapy for obese insulin-resistant pediatric patients results in significant improvement in body composition and fasting insulin. Although improvement in Si was noted in many individuals, Si was a less useful parameter for analysis of group data, possibly because of effects of variable compliance and changing Si during puberty.

20 normoglycemic first degree relatives of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients were compared with 20 matched subjects without any family history of diabetes using the intravenous glucose tolerance test with minimal model analysis of glucose disappearance and insulin kinetics. Intravenous glucose tolerance index (Kg) was similar in both groups (1.60±0.14 vs 1.59±0.18, x 10-2 minm-, NS). However, insulin sensitivity (Si) was reduced (3.49±0.43 vs 4.80±0.61, x 10-4 mind per mU/liter, P = 0.05), whereas glucose effectiveness (Sg) was increased (1.93±0.14 vs 1.52±0.16, X 10-2 min-, P < 0.05) in the relatives. Despite insulin resistance neither fasting plasma insulin concentration (7.63±0.48 vs 6.88±0.45, mU/liter, NS) nor first phase insulin responsiveness (Phil) (3.56±0.53 vs 4.13±0.62, mU/liter min' per mg/dl, NS) were increased in the relatives. Phil was reduced for the degree of insulin resistance in the relatives so that the Phil x Si index was lower in the relatives (11.5±2.2 vs 16.7±2.0, x 10-4 min 2 per mg/dl, P < 0.05). Importantly, glucose effectiveness correlated with Kg and with basal glucose oxidation but not with total glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) content in a basal muscle biopsy. In conclusion we confirm the presence of insulin resistance in first degree relatives of NIDDM patients. However, insulin secretion was altered and reduced for the degree of insulin resistance in the relatives, whereas glucose effectiveness was increased. We hypothesize that increased glucose effectiveness maintains glucose tolerance

Fourteen GH-deficient (GHD) adults were compared with 12 age-, sex-, and body mass index-matched control subjects using a baseline tritiated glucose equilibration period and euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic (approximately 55 mU/L) clamp in conjunction with paired muscle biopsies for measurement of glycogen synthase fractional velocity (FV0.1). Despite similar basal rates of total glucose disposal (Rd), there was a 64% reduction in the insulin-stimulated rise (delta) in Rd in the GHD adults compared to that in controls [16.6 +/- 2.8 vs. 44.7 +/- 6.0 mumol/kg fat free mass (FFM)/min; P < 0.001], which was mainly due to a decreased glucose storage (GS) rate (delta GS, 12.6 +/- 2.9 vs. 39.5 +/- 7.5 mumol/kg FFM/min; P < 0.01). Furthermore, the insulin sensitivity indexes of Rd (0.39 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.85 +/- 0.11; P < 0.05) and GS (0.25 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.72 +/- 0.13 mumol/kg FFM/min per mU/L; P < 0.02) were reduced in GHD adults compared to the control values. The insulin sensitivity of the glycolytic pathway was also reduced by approximately 50% in GHD adults (P = 0.07 vs. controls). Insulin-stimulated FV0.1 was decreased in GHD adults (0.31 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.47 +/- 0.03; P < 0.005) despite similar basal FV0.1. Using multiple and stepwise regression analysis, duration of GH deficiency, fasting triglycerides and fasting insulin accounted for 67% of the variance in the insulin sensitivity index of Rd. In conclusion, the severe insulin resistance in GHD adults is mainly due to the inhibition of the GS pathway and glycogen synthase activity in peripheral tissues, which is related to the duration of GH deficiency, fasting triglycerides, and fasting insulin.

No abstract

It is important for health professionals to understand the emotional, social and cognitive factors operating during transitions to assist young adults with Type 1 diabetes to achieve good health outcomes by prioritising goals and plan flexible, timely, individualised and collaborative treatment.

Both insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity are important in the development of diabetes but current methods used for their measurements are complex and cannot be used for epidemiological surveys. This study describes a simplified approach for the estimation of first phase insulin release and insulin sensitivity from a standard 40-min intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT), and compares these parameter estimations with the sophisticated minimal model analysis of a frequently sampled 3-h IVGTT and the euglycaemic clamp technique. For the simplified IVGTT, first phase insulin release was measured as the insulin area above basal post glucose load unit-1 incremental change (i.e. peak rise) in plasma glucose over 0-10 min, and insulin sensitivity as a rate of glucose disappearance (Kg) unit-1 insulin increase above basal from 0-40 min post-glucose load in 18 subjects who were studied twice, either basally or in a perturbed pathophysiological state (i.e. pre- and post-ultramarathon race, n = 5; pre- and post-20 h pulsatile hyperinsulinaemia, n = 8; pre- and post-thyrotoxic state, n = 5). A further 12 subjects were compared by IVGTT, and glucose clamp. In addition, seven dogs were studied three times by IVGTT during normal saline infusion and after short-term (1/2 hour) or long-term (72 hour) adrenaline infusions. First phase insulin release and insulin sensitivity estimated from the simplified IVGTT as calculated by the two methods correlated closely (rs = 0.89 and rs = 0.87, respectively), although less precisely in markedly insulin-resistant subjects and the slopes and y intercepts of the linear regression lines were similar in the basal and perturbed states.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Objective: To determine the prevalence of diabetes in inpatients in Melbourne hospitals. Design: Point prevalence survey of all inpatients in each hospital on a single day between 30 November 2010 and 22 November 2012. Setting: 11 hospitals in metropolitan Melbourne including community, secondary and tertiary hospitals and one aged care and rehabilitation centre. Participants: 2308 adult inpatients in all wards apart from intensive care, emergency, obstetrics and psychiatry. Main outcome measures: Point prevalence of self-reported diabetes, details of current medication, self-reported frequency of complications. Results: Diabetes status was obtained in 2273 of 2308 inpatients (98.5%). Of these, 562 (24.7%) had diabetes (95% CI, 22.9%-26.5%). Diabetes prevalence ranged from 15.7% to 35.1% in diff erent hospitals (P < 0.001). Patients with diabetes were older, heavier and more likely to be taking lipidlowering, antihypertensive and blood-thinning medications. Of 388 patients with complete medication information, 270 (69.6%) were taking oral hypoglycaemic agents alone or in combination with insulin, 158 (40.7%) were treated with insulin (67 [17.3%] with insulin alone) and 51 (13.1%) were not taking medication for diabetes. The frequency of diabetes complications was very high: 207/290 (71.4%) for any microvascular complication, 275/527 (52.2%) for any macrovascular complication and 227/276 (82.2%) for any complication. Conclusion: The high burden of diabetes in Melbourne hospital inpatients has major implications for patient health and health care expenditure. Optimising care of these high-risk patients has the potential to decrease inpatient morbidity and length of stay as well as preventing or delaying future complications. A formal Australian national audit of inpatient diabetes would determine its true prevalence and consequences, allowing rational planning to deal with shortcomings in its management.