Background-Although the relationship between mortality and time delay to treatment has been demonstrated in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated by thrombolysis, the impact of time delay on prognosis in patients undergoing primary angioplasty has yet to be clarified. The aim of this report was to address the relationship between time to treatment and mortality as a continuous function and to estimate the risk of mortality for each 30-minute delay. Methods and Results-The study population consisted of 1791 patients with STEMI treated by primary angioplasty. The relationship between ischemic time and 1-year mortality was assessed as a continuous function and plotted with a quadratic regression model. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to calculate relative risks (for each 30 minutes of delay), adjusted for baseline characteristics related to ischemic time. Variables related to time to treatment were age Ͼ70 years (PϽ0.0001), female gender (Pϭ0.004), presence of diabetes mellitus (Pϭ0.002), and previous revascularization (Pϭ0.035). Patients with successful reperfusion had a significantly shorter ischemic time (Pϭ0.006). A total of 103 patients (5.8%) had died at 1-year follow-up. After adjustment for age, gender, diabetes, and previous revascularization, each 30 minutes of delay was associated with a relative risk for 1-year mortality of 1.075 (95% CI 1.008 to 1.15; Pϭ0.041). Conclusions-These results suggest that every minute of delay in primary angioplasty for STEMI affects 1-year mortality, even after adjustment for baseline characteristics. Therefore, all efforts should be made to shorten the total ischemic time, not only for thrombolytic therapy but also for primary angioplasty.

This study shows that, in patients with STEMI treated by primary angioplasty, symptom-onset-to-balloon time, but not door-to-balloon time, is related to mortality, particularly in non-low-risk patients and in the absence of preprocedural anterograde flow. Furthermore, a symptom-onset-to-balloon time >4 h was identified as independent predictor of one-year mortality.

Aims:The optimal duration of DAPT in ACS patients treated with DES is still unclear. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate a short versus a standard 12-month DAPT regimen in ACS patients undergoing new-generation DES implantation.Methods and results: REDUCE was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, investigator-initiated study that randomised 1,496 ACS patients after treatment with the COMBO stent to either three (n=751) or 12 months (n=745) of DAPT. The primary study endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, target vessel revascularisation and bleeding at 12 months. No difference was observed in the demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups, except for gender (p=0.01). At one-year follow-up, non-inferiority of three-versus 12-month DAPT in the primary endpoint was met (8.2% vs 8.4%, p non-inferiority <0.001). The similar outcome between the two groups was confirmed at two-year follow-up (11.6% vs 12.1%, p=0.76), with no significant difference in overall mortality (3.1% vs 2.2%, p=0.27), cardiac mortality (1.8% vs 1.1%, p=0.28), stent thrombosis (1.6% vs 0.8%, p=0.16) and major bleeding (3.3% vs 4.0%, p=0.46). Conclusions:The results show that, among ACS patients treated with the COMBO stent, three months is non-inferior to 12 months of DAPT. However, given the numerically higher rates of mortality and ST in the three-month DAPT group, one-year DAPT should still be recommended in ACS until more information becomes available. A three-month DAPT strategy should be considered only if clinically mandated.

This meta-analysis demonstrates that, among patients with AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, the use of adjunctive manual thrombectomy devices is associated with better epicardial and myocardial perfusion, less distal embolization and significant reduction in 30-day mortality. Thus, adjunctive manual thrombectomy devices, if not anatomically contraindicated, should be routinely used among STEMI (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) patients undergoing primary angioplasty.