Background Helicobacter pylori is transmitted through faecal-oral or oral-oral routes. Whether H. pylori infection is more prevalent in sexual partners of H. pylori-infected subjects is unclear. Objective We evaluated 1) the prevalence of H. pylori infection in sexual partners of H. pylori-infected subjects; and 2) whether presence of gastroesophageal reflux in H. pylori-infected subjects was associated with transmission of infection to their sexual partners. Methods We evaluated H. pylori infection by 13C Urea Breath Test in sexual partners of 161 consecutive patients with H. pylori-related dyspepsia. The case-control group consisted of 161 dyspeptic subjects undergoing the 13C Urea Breath Test. The prevalence of reflux symptoms was noted through the Leeds scale. The role of gastroesophageal reflux in transmission of H. pylori infection was evaluated by binary logistic regression. A two-tailed p value of 0.05 or less was considered significant. Results Prevalence of H. pylori infection in sexual partners of H. pylori-infected subjects is 74.5% whereas prevalence of H. pylori infection in the control group is 32.3%, p<0.05. At the logistic regression analysis, the presence of reflux symptoms in H. pylori-infected subjects is independently associated with concomitant infection in both members of the couple (odds ratio 4.41, 95% confidence interval 1.6–12.3) and with length of cohabitation (odds ratio 2.39, 95% confidence interval 1.0–5.7). Conclusions The prevalence of H. pylori infection is significantly higher in sexual partners of H. pylori-infected subjects than in controls. Members of a couple are four times more likely to be both H. pylori infected if one of the couple has reflux symptoms.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of TAP block in improvement of anesthesiological management and perioperative surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). Methods: We consecutive enrolled 93 patients with prostate cancer whose underwent RALP at our department from January 2019 to December 2019. Group A included 45 patients who received bilateral TAP block, and Group B included 48 patients who did not received TAP block. TAP blocks were always performed by a single anesthesia team. An elastomeric pump device was used in all patients for post-operative pain management. TAP block was performed according to Rafi’s technique, with Ropivacaine 0.375% and dexamethasone 4 mg. Mean values with standard deviations (±SD) were computed and reported for all items. Statistical significance was achieved if p-value was ⩽0.05 (two-sides). Results: The two groups showed no difference in the most important demographics and baseline characteristics ( p > 0.05). Group A showed a significant longer time of anaesthesia. Moreover, Ketorolac doses (started dose plus continuous post-operative infusion via elastomeric pump) used in Group A were significantly lower than Group B. Despite this, Group B showed statistical significant higher value of NRS PACU and at 12, 24, 48, 72 h than Group A but not at 96 h. Rescue analgesic medication use was significantly higher in the Group B than Group A. Moreover, patency of the intestinal tract and time to ambulation was significantly lower in the Group A. Discussion: The use of TAP block during a RALP is a safe procedure that can be applied more appropriately to achieve better pain control. A multimodal protocol that includes locoregional anesthesia, reduction of intra and postoperative use of strong opiates, correct placing of the patient and the use of low pneumoperitoneum pressures should be implemented in order to reach a faster and better post-operative full recovery of patients whose underwent RALP.

No abstract

No abstract