2 AbstractPurpose: The study investigated whether perceptual learning (PL) of a task consisting in detecting a low contrast Gabor patch flanked above and below by high contrast Gabor patches presented monocularly in the preferred retinal locus (PRL) of patients with macular degeneration (MD), improved their residual visual functions. Method:We measured contrast detection thresholds using both a Yes/No task (three MD patients and three controls) and a temporal two-alternative forced-choice task (2AFC; four MD patients and three controls).Results: Both tasks produced a significant improvement in contrast sensitivity for the trained target.However, only in the case of the temporal-2AFC this improvement depended on the target-toflankers distance. Furthermore, in both tasks PL improved visual acuity but with the temporal-2AFC task we found a higher degree of generalization of the training to untrained stimuli and tasks.In fact, we found a reduction of the crowding effect and an improvement of the contrast sensitivity for untrained spatial frequencies.Although PL is more effective with a temporal-2AFC task, it is also present with a Yes/No task, suggesting that PL reflects sensory enhancement, rather than improvement in decision mechanisms.Most importantly, follow-up tests on MD patients showed that PL effects were retained between four and eight months, suggesting PL induced long-term neural plasticity in the visual cortex. Conclusion:The results show for the first time that PL with a collinear configuration has strong, non-invasive and long lasting rehabilitative potential to improve vision in the PRL of patients with central vision loss.3

No abstract

BackgroundAmblyopic observers present abnormal spatial interactions between a low-contrast sinusoidal target and high-contrast collinear flankers. It has been demonstrated that perceptual learning (PL) can modulate these low-level lateral interactions, resulting in improved visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. ObjectiveWe measured the extent and duration of generalization effects to various spatial tasks (i.e., visual acuity, Vernier acuity, and foveal crowding) through PL on the target's contrast detection. MethodsAmblyopic observers were trained on a contrast-detection task for a central target (i.e., a Gabor patch) flanked above and below by two high-contrast Gabor patches. The pre-and post-learning tasks included lateral interactions at different target-to-flankers separations (i.e., 2, 3, 4, 8) and included a range of spatial frequencies and stimulus durations as well as visual acuity, Vernier acuity, contrast-sensitivity function, and foveal crowding. ResultsThe results showed that perceptual training reduced the target's contrast-detection thresholds more for the longest target-to-flanker separation (i.e., 8). We also found generalization of PL to different stimuli and tasks: contrast sensitivity for both trained and untrained spatial frequencies, visual acuity for Sloan letters, and foveal crowding, and partially for Vernier acuity. Follow-ups after 5-7 2 months showed not only complete maintenance of PL effects on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity function but also further improvement in these tasks. ConclusionThese results suggest that PL improves facilitatory lateral interactions in amblyopic observers, which usually extend over larger separations than in typical foveal vision. The improvement in these basic visual spatial operations leads to a more efficient capability of performing spatial tasks involving high levels of visual processing, possibly due to the refinement of bottom-up and topdown networks of visual areas.

No abstract

Peripheral object discrimination is hindered by a central dynamic mask presented between 150 and 300 ms after stimulus onset. The mask is thought to interfere with task-relevant feedback coming from higher visual areas to the foveal cortex in V1. Fan et al. (2016) supported this hypothesis by showing that the effect of mask can be further delayed if the task requires mental manipulation of the peripheral target. The main purpose of this study was to better characterize the temporal dynamics of foveal feedback. Specifically, in two experiments we have shown that (1) the effect of foveal noise mask is sufficiently robust to be replicated in an online data collection (2) in addition to a change in sensitivity the mask affects also the criterion, which becomes more conservative; (3) the expected dipper function for sensitivity approximates a quartic with a global minimum at 94 ms, while the best fit for criterion is a quintic with a global maximum at 174 ms; (4) the power spectrum analysis of perceptual oscillations in sensitivity data shows a cyclic effect of mask at 3 and 12 Hz. Overall, our results show that foveal noise affects sensitivity in a cyclic manner, with a global dip emerging earlier than previously found. The noise also affects the response bias, even though with a different temporal profile. We, therefore, suggest that foveal noise acts on two distinct feedback mechanisms, a faster perceptual feedback followed by a slower cognitive feedback.

Human sensitivity to speed differences is very high, and relatively high when one has to compare the speed of an object that disappears behind an occluder with a standard. Nevertheless, different speed illusions (by contrast, adaptation, dynamic visual noise) affect proper speed judgment for both visible and occluded moving objects. In the present study, we asked whether an illusion due to non-directional motion noise (random dynamic visual noise, rDVN) intervenes at the level of speed encoding, thus affecting speed discrimination, or at the level of speed decoding by non-sensory decision-making mechanisms, indexed by speed overestimation of visible and invisible motion. In Experiment 1, participants performing a temporal two-Alternative Forced Choice task, judged the speed of a target moving in front of the rDVN or a static visual noise (SVN). In Experiment 2 and 3, the target disappeared behind the rDVN/SVN, and participants reported whether the target reappeared early or late (Experiment 2), or the time to contact (TTC) with the end of the occluded trajectory (Experiment 3). In Experiment 1 and 2, we found that rDVN affected the point of subjective equality (pse) of the individual's psychometric function in a way indicating speed overestimation, while not affecting speed discrimination threshold (just noticeable differences, jnd). In Experiment 3 the rDVN reduced the TTC. Though not entirely consistent, our results suggest that a similar speed decoding mechanism, which read-out motion information to form a perceptual decision, operates regarding of whether motion is visible or invisible.

Contrast sensitivity for a Gabor signal is affected by collinear high-contrast Gabor flankers. The flankers reduce (inhibitory effect) or increase (facilitatory effect) sensitivity, at short (2λ) and intermediate (6λ) target-to-flanker separation respectively. We investigated whether these inhibitory/facilitatory sensitivity effects are modulated by transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) applied to the occipital and frontal cortex of human observers during task performance. Signal detection theory was used to measure sensitivity (d’) and the Criterion (C) in a contrast detection task, performed with sham or tRNS applied over the occipital or the frontal cortex. After occipital stimulation results show a tRNS-dependent increased sensitivity for the single Gabor signal of low but not high contrast. Moreover, results suggest a dissociation of the tRNS effect when the Gabor signal is presented with the flankers, consisting in a general increased sensitivity at 2λ where the flankers had an inhibitory effect (reduction of inhibition) and a decreased sensitivity at 6λ where the flankers had a facilitatory effect on the Gabor signal (reduction of facilitation). After a frontal stimulation, no specific effect of the tRNS was found. We account for these complex interactions between tRNS and flankers by assuming that tRNS not only enhances feedforward input from the Gabor signal to the cortex, but also enhances the excitatory or inhibitory lateral intracortical input from the flankers. The boosted lateral input depends on the excitation-inhibition (E/I) ratio, namely when the lateral input is weak, it is boosted by tRNS with consequent modification of the contrast-dependent E/I ratio.

These results suggest that NRT may lead to visual field enlargement and translate into untrained visual functions.