Socioeconomic status (SES) impacts outcome in a number of diseases. Our aim was to compare the outcome of hospitalized coronavirus disease 219 (COVID-19) patients in low and high SES group. Prospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 in three acute hospitals. Electronic case notes were analyzed for baseline characteristics and admission investigations. Scottish index for multiple deprivation (SIMD) was used to divide patients into two groups: more deprived (SIMD 1-5) and less deprived (SIMD 6-10) and results compared. Poor outcome was defined as either need for intubation and/or death. One hundred and seventy-three patients were identified, one was excluded. One hundred and eight (62.8%) were males, mean age was 68.5 ± 14.7 years. Commonest comorbidity was hypertension 87 (50.6%). One hundred and seventeen (68.0%) patients were in more deprived group. Baseline characteristics, admission blood profile and reason for admission were evenly matched in both groups. Outcomes were comparable in both groups: transfer to critical care (27.4% vs 27.3%; P = .991), intubation (18.8% vs 20.2%; P = .853), 30-day all-cause mortality (19.7% vs 14.5%; P = .416) and overall poor outcome (30.8% vs 30.9%; P = .985). Median time to discharge was 7 days longer (17 vs 10 days; P = .018) and median time to death was 4.5 days longer in more deprived group (17 vs 12.5 days; P = .388). Contrary to recent literature on COVID-19 in other geographical areas, our study suggests that the SES does not have any impact on outcome of hospitalized patients with COVID-19, however it negatively impacts length of stay.
Introduction The host systemic inflammatory response (SIR) is prognostic in a wide variety of solid tumours, with a greater degree of inflammation being associated with a worse clinical outcome. Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) is an established way to measure SIR in vivo. We aimed to establish whether preoperative NLR correlates with infective complications in patients undergoing colorectal cancer (CRC) resection. Methods Data was extracted retrospectively for all CRC resections over a 2 year period (2016-2018) at a single district general hospital. NLR was measured for each patient from bloods at the time of pre-operative assessment. Post-operative complications were recorded using the Clavien-Dindo classification and subsequently classified as infective and non-infective. A Two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate the data from an online resource. Results Of the 131 patients, 49 had complications of which 20 were infective. Of total complications 58% were male and 35% were aged 75 years or older. Current or ex-smokers constituted 43% and 41 of the total patients had a BMI >30 kg/m2. Pre-assessment mean NLR was 2.3 in those without complications and 4.7 in those with any complication. A mean NLR of 5.4 was present in those with infective complications, p-value 0.026. Conclusion This study found that a raised NLR was present preoperatively in those who developed infective complications following CRC resection. This is a simple, readily available and cost-effective method of identifying patients at risk of complication. This ultimately may be useful in highlighting patients who would benefit from enhanced pre-operative optimisation. Further research to validate these findings in larger studies would seem warranted.
In December 2019 details of a novel coronavirus emerged from Wuhan, the capital city of Hubei province in China [1]. Just over one month later the World Health Organization declared the ensuing crisis a global pandemic. With an escalating death toll and the introduction of widespread stringent lock-down measures to halt the spread of the virus, the social and economic consequences will be lasting. Worldwide there is therefore an urgent need to expand of our knowledge of the virus and how to best manage it.Coronaviruses are themselves well known, however it is the so called Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that causes the disease, now termed 3]. While our understanding remains incomplete, knowledge of the transmission characteristics of the virus have since evolved. Person-to-person transmission is now well recognized. Like influenza virus, this is believed to be
Aim The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruption in surgical training. We aim to explore the preferences of higher general surgical trainees for Annual Review of Competency Progression (ARCP) also compare the responses across different training grades. Method All higher general surgical trainee in a single deanery were invited to participate in an online voluntary anonymous survey. The respondents were divided in two groups: junior (ST3-ST5) and senior higher surgical trainees (ST6-ST8) and responses compared. Results Sixty-four of 88 trainees responded. Thirty-three (51.6%) were ST3–ST5, 24 (37.5%) were ST6–ST8 and 7 (10.9%) were out-of-training. More trainees in ST3–ST5 group preferred to defer the next rotation for 12 months (18.2% vs 0%, p = 0.034), repeat current sub-specialty (33.3% vs 4.2%, p = 0.009), or add 12 months to training and delay predicted CCT date by 12 months (18.2% vs 0%, p = 0.034). Most trainees in both groups preferred the option of prolonging training should be offered to all trainees with an option to decline extension if ARCP competencies met (66.7% vs 50.0%, p = 0.276). Conclusions The preference for ARCP and length of training was different between two training groups, hence the need of trainees should be considered by training committees when addressing the impact of COVID-19.
Aims The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruption in surgical training. We aim to explore the preferences of higher general surgical trainees for Annual Review of Competency Progression (ARCP) also compare the responses across different training grades. Methods All higher general surgical trainee in a single deanery were invited to participate in an online voluntary anonymous survey. The respondents were divided in two groups: junior (ST3-ST5) and senior higher surgical trainees (ST6-ST8) and responses compared. Results Sixty-four of 88 trainees responded. Thirty-three (51.6%) were ST3–ST5, 24 (37.5%) were ST6–ST8 and 7 (10.9%) were out-of-training. More trainees in ST3–ST5 group preferred to defer the next rotation for 12 months (18.2% vs 0%, p = 0.034), repeat current sub-specialty (33.3% vs 4.2%, p = 0.009), or add 12 months to training and delay predicted CCT date by 12 months (18.2% vs 0%, p = 0.034). Most trainees in both groups preferred the option of prolonging training should be offered to all trainees with an option to decline extension if ARCP competencies met (66.7% vs 50.0%, p = 0.276). Conclusions The preference for ARCP and length of training was different between two training groups, hence the need of trainees should be considered by training committees when addressing the impact of COVID-19.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.