Poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) plays important roles in DNA damage response pathways and is often overexpressed in various human tumors. Currently, the use of PARP inhibitors for breast cancer (BC) therapy is the subject of debate, and there is an urgent need to understand much the expression and prognostic role of the PARP1 protein. The aim was to investigate the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of PARP1 in BC patients. The PARP1 and breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) protein expressions were evaluated in 114 BCs by immunohistochemistry. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined based on the Kaplan-Meier method. Our results showed that nuclear PARP1 expression was significantly associated with peritumoral vascular invasion (P = 0.046), chemotherapeutic treatment (P = 0.026), oestrogen receptor (ER; P = 0.013), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2; P = 0.003) and BRCA1 (P < 0.001) expression. Survival analyses showed a significant association with clinical outcome in the subgroup of ER-negative patients (P = 0.017 for DFS and P = 0.048 for OS) and in the subgroup of patients treated with chemotherapeutic agents (P = 0.042 for DFS and P = 0.046 for OS). A significant correlation was also found for DFS in patients characterized by tumors without peritumoral vascular invasion (P = 0.022). More importantly, multivariate analyses revealed that high nuclear PARP1 expression was associated with decreased DFS (P = 0.012) and OS (P = 0.026). In conclusion, PARP1 expression may be used as an independent prognostic factor in BC patients. In addition, this study demonstrated that high PARP1 expression may represent a marker of poorer prognosis both for patients with worse clinical outcome and in less aggressive clinical conditions.

It has been recognized that Na+/H+ Exchanger Regulatory Factor 1 (NHERF1) in breast cancer (BC) acts as a tumor suppressor or as an oncogenic protein, depending on its subcellular localization. This study aims to correlate NHERF1 expression to BRCA1 and PARP1 proteins, to investigate their relationship, and their biological and clinical significance. Using immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays, we evaluated subcellular NHERF1, BRCA1 and PARP1 expression in 308 BCs including a subgroup (n=80) of triple negative BCs (TNBCs). Herein, we show that nuclear NHERF1 (nNHERF1) expression was significantly associated with nuclear BRCA1 (nBRCA1) expression (p=0.0008), and an association was also found between nuclear PARP1 (nPARP1) and nBRCA1 (p<0.0001). Cytoplasmic NHERF1 (cNHERF1) was correlated to nPARP1 (p<0.0001). Survival analyses showed that the patients with positive nPARP1 and nNHERF1 tended toward a shorter 5-year overall survival (OS) (p=0.057). In TNBCs, the association between nBRCA1 and nPARP1 was maintained (p<0.0001), and an association between nNHERF1 and nPARP1 was observed (p=0.010). Univariate analysis revealed that TNBCs with positive cNHERF1 and nPARP1 had a shorter 5-year OS (p=0.048).Our data suggest that NHERF1 could be a new potential biomarker in combination with PARP1 and BRCA1 expression to stratify BC patients. In particular, in TNBCs, cNHERF1 associated with nPARP1 expression identified a patient subgroup with a shorter survival, for whom it may be useful to develop novel therapeutic strategies.

Enzymatic activation of irinotecan (CPT-11) is due to carboxylesterase (CES), and its pharmacological behavior is influenced by drug resistance-related proteins. We previously reported that the clinical response and prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients did not differ in tumors with different thymidylate synthase (TS) or topoisomerase-I (Topo-I) expression. Using immunohistochemistry (IHC), we evaluated the biological role of CES2 and the expression of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) in 58 consecutive mCRC patients, who had undergone a first-line CPT-11/5-FU/leucovirin (FOLFIRI) regimen. The expression of these proteins was also examined in a group of synchronous lymph nodes and liver metastases. Furthermore, all samples were revaluated for TS and Topo-I expression. High expression of CES2, ABCG2, TS and Topo-I was observed in 55%, 56%, 38% and 49% of patients, respectively. There was a significant association between high TS and high ABCG2 expression (p = 0.049). Univariate analysis showed that only TS expression significantly impacted on time to progression (p = 0.005). Moreover, Cox’ multivariate analysis revealed that TS expression was significantly associated with overall survival (p = 0.01). No significant correlation was found between investigated markers expression and clinical response. Topo-I expression resulted in being significantly higher in liver metastases with respect to the corresponding primary tumors (p < 0.0001), emphasizing the role of Topo-I expression in metastatic cancer biology. In primary tumor tissues, CES2 expression tended to be higher than that observed in liver metastasis tissues (p = 0.05). These preliminary data may suggest CES2 over-expression as a potential marker of malignant phenotype. In light of these findings, we suggest that Topo-I expression together with TS expression could be associated with metastatic progression of CRC. Further studies are warranted with the aim of evaluating the potential predictive and prognostic role of CES2 and ABCG2 in larger series of patients.