No abstract

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a neutrophilic dermatosis which may be rapidly progressive. Standard guidelines for local treatment are lacking. Through our experience, we suggested a local treatment algorithm based on the tissue, infection, moisture balance, and epithelization (TIME) concept. The clinical and histopathological features of 52 patients with PG, the duration, and the evolution of the lesions were retrospectively evaluated. Systemic therapies, local treatments, and standard wound treatments were reported. We observed ulcerative PG in the majority of the patients (82.6%), followed by the pustular form (9.6%), the peristomal type (3.8%), the vegetative form (1.9%), and the bullous type (1.9%). The lower leg was the most commonly area affected (90.4% of cases). Pathergy was reported in 15.3% of cases. The first‐line treatment was the use of oral glucocorticosteroids (GCSs). We observed healing after 3 weeks of GCS in 17.3% of cases. In 25% of all cases, we obtained complete healing with long‐term low doses (<0.5 mg/kg) of GCS in the range of 2 to 6 months. We used second‐line treatments in 57.6% of patients. Local, systemic treatment, and correct wound management can be associated with better clinical results. We suggest a new local therapeutic algorithm in both the inflammatory and noninflammatory healing phases.

No abstract

Background There is a strong interaction between the immunological and nervous system in the skin. Lesions that are physically disfiguring and chronically relapsing have a high impact on quality of life (QoL) and can result in the emergence of psychiatric disorders. The literature data confirm a higher prevalence of psychiatric disorders in patients with psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and atopic dermatitis (AD), but such data are compromised by low‐quality evidence due to methodological heterogeneity. Objectives The primary aim was to analyse the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities in a group of psoriasis, AD and HS patients compared with a control group. The secondary aims were to evaluate the impact of psychiatric comorbidities on the disease development, severity, flare‐ups and QoL. Methods A total of 59 cases and 64 controls were included. Results Generalized anxiety disorder and depressive disorder with anxious distress were found to be risk factors for AD. Age, smoking and substance‐related disorder showed a specific association with HS. Major depressive disorder showed a specific association with dermatology life quality index (DLQI) and all the above disease flare‐ups. Conclusions Atopic dermatitis, psoriasis and HS are associated with psychiatric disorders. A psychodermatological approach improves outcomes in terms of QoL, disease flare‐ups and long‐term management.

No abstract

Healing rate is the most accurate method to predict healing; however, there are no data in atypical ulcers. We retrospectively analyzed clinical features, associated comorbidities, and therapies of 159 patients with atypical ulcers. In a subgroup of 59 patients, we analyzed the areas, perimeters, and the healing rate (mm/d) as prognostic indicators of wound healing. Atypical ulcers were more frequent among women (n = 98) with an average age of 76 years. Confirmed by biopsy, the etiologies were as follows: inflammatory diseases (38%), neoplastic ulcers (29%), vasculitis (21%), drug-induced ulcers (7%), and infectious ulcers (4%). Systemic therapies were applied based on the different etiologies. Wound bed preparation principles guided the local treatment. The average reduction of the area during the observation interval was 36%, while the average reduction in the perimeter was 41%. Overall, 51 ulcers showed a reduction in wound size and 8 ulcers showed an increase. Neoplastic ulcers were the group with the fastest healing rate, with an average speed of 0.24 mm/d. The slowest healing occurred in the inflammatory group with an average healing rate of 0.032 mm/d. The initial area and perimeters influenced wound healing; however, ulcer etiology and comorbidities significantly altered the healing rate.

Objective: The recently completed EUREKA study confirmed the efficacy and safety profile of fluorescent light energy (FLE) in treating hard-to-heal wounds. To supplement the EUREKA prospective, observational, uncontrolled trial results, researchers selected one of the EUREKA clinical centres to conduct a retrospective analysis of matching wound care data for 46 venous leg ulcers (VLU) patients who had received standard wound care over a five-year period, compared with 10 EUREKA VLU subjects. Method: The study centre selected 46 patients with VLUs based on the matching criteria (wound age and size, patient's age and gender). They compared the healing rates of these matching VLUs with 10 VLU patients treated at the same centre during the EUREKA study. Results: The EUREKA patients had larger and significantly older wounds (p<0.05) and significantly more risk factors (p<0.05) than the matching wounds. However, they had better outcomes (EUREKA: 40% versus matching group: 7% for full wound closure by 16 weeks). No wound breakdown was observed at 16 weeks in the EUREKA group, compared with 25% in the matching group. No EUREKA patient developed infections requiring antibiotics, compared with 37% in the matching group. EUREKA wounds had a mean relative wound area regression (RWAR) of 32% at week six and 50% at week 16, compared with −3% at week six and −6% at week 16 for the matching group. Conclusion: These findings show that the system based on FLE was well-tolerated and efficacious, with better clinical outcome results compared with the wounds analysed in this retrospective matching study and treated with standard of care alone.

In the quality control process, risk analysis is a useful tool for enhancing the uniformity of technical choices and their documented rationale. Accordingly, it allows for more effective and economical laboratory management, is capable of increasing the reliability of analytical results, and enables auditors and authorities to better understand choices that have been made. The aim of this article is to show how hazard analysis and critical control points can be used to manage bacterial endotoxins testing and other analytical processes in a formal, clear, and detailed manner.