Eighty college females listened to one of four taped conversations, which they were led to believe were personality evaluations of themselves. The content of the evaluations varied in feedback, which described either strengths or weaknesses in adjustment, and in form, in that each recording was either completely intelligible or partially unintelligible to simulate normal and impaired hearing, respectively. The emotional reactivity of the subjects was assessed with several psychometric instruments once before and again immediately after they listened to the tapes; the pre/post difference scores reflected the negative emotions elicited by the experimental manipulations. Factorial analyses of variance yielded significant main effects for each variable, hearing and feedback, but no interaction. Anxiety, depression, negative attribution, and paranoid reactions were increased by both impaired hearing and unfavorable feedback, and their adverse effects were independent and additive.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.