This study addresses the question of the origin of the long-latency responses evoked in flexors in the forearm by afferents from human hand muscles. The effects of electrical stimuli to the ulnar nerve at wrist level were assessed in healthy subjects using post-stimulus time histograms for flexor digitorum superficialis and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) single motor units (eight subjects) and the modulation of the ongoing rectified FCR EMG (19 subjects). Ulnar stimulation evoked four successive peaks of heteronymous excitation that were not produced by purely cutaneous stimuli: a monosynaptic Ia excitation, a second group I excitation attributable to a propriospinally mediated effect, and two late peaks. The first long-latency excitation occurred 8-13 ms after monosynaptic latency and had a high-threshold (1.2-1.5 × motor threshold). When the conditioning stimulation was applied at a more distal site and when the ulnar nerve was cooled, the latency of this late excitation increased more than the latency of monosynaptic Ia excitation. This late response was not evoked in the contralateral FCR of one patient with bilateral corticospinal projections to FCR motoneurones. Finally, oral tizanidine suppressed the long-latency high-threshold excitation but not the early low-threshold group I responses. These results suggest that the late high-threshold response is mediated through a spinal pathway fed by muscle spindle group II afferents. The second long-latency excitation, less frequently observed (but probably underestimated), occurred 16-18 ms after monosynaptic latency, had a low threshold indicating a group I effect, and was not suppressed by tizanidine. It is suggested that this latest excitation involves a transcortical pathway.
This study addresses whether there is excitation from human hand muscles to flexor carpi radialis (FCR) motoneurones mediated through propriospinal circuits and, if so, whether it is used in specific motor tasks. Electrical stimuli to the ulnar nerve at wrist level produced an excitation in FCR motoneurones with characteristics typical of a propriospinally mediated effect: low threshold (0.6 × motor threshold (MT)), a group I effect that was not reproduced by purely cutaneous stimuli, long central delay (4.1 ± 0.4 ms in single units), suppression when the stimulus intensity was increased, and facilitation of the corticospinal excitation at the premotoneuronal level. Ulnar-induced propriospinally mediated excitation was compared during selective voluntary contractions of the FCR and, at equivalent level of FCR EMG, during tasks in which the FCR was activated automatically in postural contractions rather than voluntarily (grip, pinching and pointing). The excitation was significantly greater during grip (and pinching) than during voluntary FCR contractions and pointing, whether measured in single motor units or tonic EMG activity, or whether the response to motor cortex stimulation was assessed as the compound motor-evoked potential or the corticospinal peak in single units. The discrepancy between the tasks appeared with ulnar intensities above 0.8 × MT and was then present across a wide range of stimulus intensities. This suggests a reduction in the corticospinal control of 'feedback inhibitory interneurones' mediating peripheral inhibition to propriospinal neurones during grip and pinching. The resulting more effective background excitation of propriospinal neurones by the peripheral input from hand muscles could contribute to stabilizing the wrist during grip.
Effects of electrical stimulation of ulnar and median nerves at wrist level were investigated in post-stimulus time histograms (PSTHs) of single motor units from both flexors and extensors in human arm and forearm. Stimulation of ulnar nerve produced late (mean extra time-after monosynaptic group Ia excitation-10.7 +/- 0.1 ms) high-threshold (>1.2 x motor threshold, MT) excitation, which was not reproduced by purely cutaneous stimulation, in all the investigated motor nuclei except in Extensor Carpi Radialis. Stimulation of median nerve, and of the skin of fingers II and III (at palmar side level), produced short latency inhibition (mean extra time 3.8 +/- 0.3 ms), which was most often truncated or followed by late excitation (mean extra time 11.8 +/- 0.3 ms); both effects were of low threshold (0.8 x MT). Short latency inhibition was very strong, and late excitation was rare and weak in almost all the investigated motor units except in those supplying flexors in forearm, in which the main effect was the late facilitation (stronger than in other motoneurones). Since extra time was not more than 13 ms, it is suggested that the late effects may be mediated through spinal pathways, at least during their 3-5 first ms. Based on the electrophysiological results and on the anatomical characteristics of ulnar and median nerves, it is assumed that ulnar-induced late high-threshold peak in PSTHs might reflect group II excitation in spinal motoneurones, and median-induced modifications in motor unit discharge, mainly cutaneous control of motoneurone discharge. Since the central delay of median-induced inhibition is longer the more caudal the motoneurone, inhibitory propriospinal-like interneurones are supposed to mediate cutaneous inhibitory control from hand upon muscles in arm and forearm. Potential roles of proprioceptive and cutaneous control from hand to more proximal musculature, provided by ulnar and median nerve, respectively, during precise hand movements are discussed.
It has been observed that mechanical stimulation of the skin of the index fingertip causes a weak short-latency inhibition followed by a strong long-lasting facilitation of the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) H-reflex. Based on threshold and latency, these cutaneous reflexes are thought to be routed to motoneurons by parallel pathways. As recent studies have shown predominant inhibitory potentials in slow motoneurons and predominant excitatory potentials in faster ones, the question arises as to whether or not the two cutaneous pathways converge onto the same motoneuron. The poststimulus time histogram technique was used to investigate the changes in firing frequency of low-threshold FCR motor units (MUs), induced by passive mechanical or focal electrical stimuli to the index skin. After gently tapping the finger pulp a small sharp inhibition appeared in 20 MUs. On average, inhibition started 10.2 ± 1.6 ms from the homonymous Ia monosynaptic effect, and its central delay was estimated to be 1.2 ± 1.6 ms. The subsequent facilitation, more consistent, had a mean latency of 13.5 ± 1.7 ms. Inhibition and excitation were statistically significant (P < 0.05). A similar biphasic effect was observed in seven other FCR-MUs, also after focal electrical stimulation of the same skin area. Comparison with the time course of the H-reflex, representing the whole population of MUs, showed striking similarities in time course and latency to the present MU effect. It is thus suggested that cutaneous spinal pathways may have a homogeneous distribution within the FCR motoneuron pool, and that the skewed distribution of cutaneous afferents onto motoneurons should be not taken as a rule.
We looked for an impaired interaction in the primary motor cortex between intracortical inhibitory circuits and circuits fed by somatosensory inputs in patients with writer's cramp. Short-interval intracortical inhibition (sICI) to wrist extensor carpi radialis muscle (ECR) was conditioned by stimulation of antagonist muscle afferents and sICI to first dorsal interosseus (FDI) muscle by homotopic cutaneous afferents stimulation. sICI was assessed at rest and during a tonic contraction of the target muscle. Eighteen patients with writer's cramp (10 having a wrist dystonic posture in flexion during writing and 8 in extension) were compared to 14 control subjects. Peripheral inputs decreased sICI in control subjects. This decrease was lost in patients in both FDI and ECR, regardless of the wrist dystonic posture. By contrast, contraction-induced depression of sICI appeared dependant on the dystonic status of the muscle: depression of sICI to ECR was abolished in patients with wrist dystonic posture in flexion, but not in patients with dystonic posture in extension, sICI even giving way to motor-evoked potential facilitation. Loss of interaction between interneurons mediating sICI and peripheral inputs probably belongs to the initial abnormalities underlying dystonia. Lack of peripherally induced sICI modulation may oppose wrist and/or hand muscles synergies.
A decrease of heteronymous median nerve-evoked inhibition of corticospinal projections to forearm extensor muscles was reported in a group of 10 dystonic patients by Bertolasi and colleagues in 2003. Here we tested the excitability of corticomotoneuronal connections to both wrist extensor (ECR) and flexor (FCR) muscles after conditioning stimulation of median and also radial nerve at rest in a group of 25 patients with focal hand dystonia compared to 20 healthy subjects. We also investigated the effect of the wrist dystonic posture, either in flexion or in extension, on the afferent modulation of ECR and FCR motor evolved potentials (MEPs). The heteronymous (median-induced) but also homonymous (radial-induced) inhibitions (interstimuli intervals 13-21 ms) of ECR MEP size observed in healthy subjects were decreased in patients. In addition, homonymous (median-induced) facilitation of FCR MEP size was also decreased in patients while heteronymous inhibition (radial-induced) was not. Neither the involvement of the target muscle in the dystonic posture nor the origin of the afferent volley (from a dystonic muscle) influenced the degree of impairment of afferent modulation of the MEP. These findings support the view that a global abnormal somatosensory coupling in focal hand dystonia may contribute to an inadequate motor command to wrist muscles.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.