Aim
This study explored psychotherapists’ experiences of medical language used in cancer care settings and the implications for counselling clients in medically driven cancer settings.
Method
Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with five psychotherapists. Data were collected using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA).
Findings
Participants found medical language difficult to understand when communicating with health professionals within multidisciplinary teams (MDT). They also considered focusing on clients’ experiences and saw the therapeutic relationship as more relevant than having knowledge of medical language.
Conclusions/Implications
Knowledge of medical language was found helpful when communicating with health professionals in MDT but was also a potential distraction from clients’ narratives, interfering with the therapeutic alliance. The question as to what extent, if at all, psychological therapists fit into the medical model, or the extent to which language and discourses of power within medical settings can impact on the clients–doctors–therapists’ relationship, remains open.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.