BackgroundThere is a lack of data on the long-term outcome of total hip arthroplasty procedures, as assessed by validated tools.MethodsWe conducted a follow-up study to evaluate the quality of life and functionality of 250 patients an average of 16 years (range: 11-23 years) after total hip arthroplasty using a validated assessment set including the SF-36 questionnaire, Harris Hip Score, WOMAC score, Functional Comorbidity Index, and a study specific questionnaire. Models of multiple stepwise linear and logistic regression analysis were constructed to evaluate the relationships between several explanatory variables and these functional outcomes.ResultsThe SF-36 physical indexes of these patients compared negatively with the normative values but positively with the results obtained in untreated subjects with severe hip osteoarthritis. Similar results were detected for the Harris Hip Score and WOMAC score. There was a 96% rate of post-surgical satisfaction. Hip functionality and comorbidities were the most important determinants of physical measures on the SF-36.ConclusionsPatients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty have impaired long-term self-reported physical quality of life and hip functionality but they still perform physically better than untreated patients with advanced hip osteoarthritis. However, the level of post-surgical satisfaction is high.

Several studies have reported the rate of post-operative mortality after the surgical treatment of a fracture of the hip, but few data are available regarding the delayed morbidity. In this prospective study, we identified 568 patients who underwent surgery for a fracture of the hip and who were followed for one year. Multivariate analysis was carried out to identify possible predictors of mortality and morbidity. The 30-day, four-month and one-year rates of mortality were 4.3%, 11.4%, and 18.8%, respectively. General complications and pre-operative comorbidities represented the basic predictors of mortality at any time interval (p< 0.01). In-hospital, four-month and one-year general complications occurred in 29.4%, 18.6% and 6.7% of patients, respectively. After adjusting for confounding variables, comorbidities and poor cognitive status determined the likelihood of early and delayed general complications, respectively (p < 0.001). Operative delay was the main predictor of the length of hospital stay (p < 0.001) and was directly related to in-hospital (p = 0.017) and four-month complications (p = 0.008).

Prognostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

BackgroundCulturing of the sonication fluid of removed implants has proven to be more sensitive than conventional periprosthetic tissue culture for the microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. Since bacteria surviving on antibiotic-loaded cement spacers used in a two-stage exchange protocol for infected arthroplasties may cause the persistence of infection, in this study we asked whether the sonication also could be used to identify bacteria on antibiotic-loaded cement spacers removed at the second surgical stage during a two-stage exchange procedure to confirm whether or not the prosthetic joint infection had been eradicated.MethodsWe cultured the sonication fluid of cement spacers that had been originally implanted in a two-stage exchange protocol in 21 patients (mean age, 66 years) affected by prosthetic joint infection (16 total knee prostheses and 5 hip prostheses). The cement spacers were vortexed for 30 seconds and then subjected to sonication (frequency 35–40 KHz). The resulting sonicate fluid was cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.ResultsThe sonication fluid culture of the removed spacer was positive in six patients (29%), with isolation of methicillin-sensible Staphylococcus Aureus (MSSA) in three cases, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) in one case and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in two cases. In three of these positive cases, the traditional culture of periprosthetic tissue was negative. Two patients with positive sonication culture of the spacer were successfully treated by early debridement of the revision prosthesis and systemic antibiotic therapy. In three patients a knee arthrodesis was planned and performed as the second surgical stage. In two of them the infection was caused by highly resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. The other patient with a MSSA infection had been poorly compliant with the systemic antibiotic therapy due to her mental impairment. The patient originally affected by MRSA infection of his primary hip arthroplasty developed recurrent infection of his revision prosthesis and eventually underwent Girdlestone arthroplasty.ConclusionsThe sonication culture can be used to discover any bacteria on the antibiotic-loaded cement spacer during a two-stage exchange protocol, thus permitting the adoption of timely treatment options, such as the early prosthetic debridment.

Objectives: To evaluate the results obtained using unilateral external fixation as a definitive treatment for humeral shaft fractures and to identify possible predictors of radiographic and functional outcomes. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: One large metropolitan hospital. Patients: A consecutive cohort of 107 patients who underwent external fixation for 109 humeral shaft fractures. Main Outcome Measures: Union rate, time to fracture healing, and functional assessment with disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, Constant score, Mayo Elbow Performance Index, and return to prefracture sports activity at a minimum of 2 years after surgery. Comorbidities were evaluated using the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine whether any explanatory variables were significantly associated with the outcomes. Results: The union rate in 109 humeral shaft fractures was 97.2% (106/109) at a mean of 99.2 days. Two patients (1.8%) had delayed union, and 1 patient (0.9%) did not achieve union. At the latest follow-up, the mean Constant score, Mayo Elbow Performance Index, and disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire score was 85.6, 97.4, and 7.4 points, respectively. All patients engaged in sports activities before fracture resumed a sport activity. At the multiple linear regression analysis, obesity was directly related to a delayed healing of fracture (P = 0.010) and comorbidity was the most important determinant of the functional outcomes at follow-up (P < 0.001). Conclusions: These data support the use of unilateral external fixation as an effective therapeutic option in patients with humeral shaft fracture. Comorbidity as assessed by Cumulative Illness Rating Scale score is the most important determinant of functional outcomes. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

No abstract