As SEDDS can: i) provide a protective effect towards a presystemic metabolism; ii) efficiently permeate the intestinal mucus gel layer in order to reach the absorption membrane; and iii) be produced in a very simple and cost-effective manner, they are a promising tool for oral peptide and protein drug delivery.
Context: Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) are among most promising tools for improving oral peptide bioavailability. Objective: In this study, in vitro protective effect of SEDDS containing desmopressin against presystemic inactivation by glutathione and a-chymotrypsin was evaluated. Materials and methods: The partitioning coefficient (log P) of desmopressin was increased via hydrophobic ion pairing using anionic surfactants. Solubility studies were performed to select the appropriate solvents for SEDDS preparation. Subsequently, droplet size and emulsification properties of 22 SEDDS formulations were evaluated. Moreover, the peptide-surfactant complex was dissolved in two chosen SEDDS formulations. Finally, SEDDS containing desmopressin were characterized regarding lipase stability, toxicity, and in vitro protective effect toward glutathione and a-chymotrypsin. Results: Desmopressin log P was increased from initial À6.13 to 0.33 using sodium docusate. The resulting desmopressin docusate complex (DES/AOT) was incorporated in two different SEDDS formulations, containing Capmul 907 P as main solvent. DES/AOT-SEDDS-F4 (containing 0.07% w/w DES/AOT) was composed of 50% Capmul 907P, 40% Cremophor RH40, and 10% Transcutol. The comparatively more hydrophilic formulation DES/AOT-SEDDS-F15 (containing 0.25% w/w DES/AOT) consisted of 20% Capmul 907P, 40% Acconon MC8-2, and 40% Tween 20. Both formulations were stable toward digestion by lipase and protected desmopressin toward a-chymotrypsin degradation. Moreover, DES/AOT-SEDDS-F4 also protected the peptide from thiol/disulfide exchange reactions with glutathione and was not cytotoxic at a concentration of 0.375% (w/w). Conclusion: DES/AOT-SEDDS-F4 protected desmopressin from in vitro glutathione and a-chymotrypsin degradation. DES/AOT-SEDDS-F4 was metabolically stable and nontoxic. Therefore, it could be considered as a potential delivery system for oral desmopressin administration.
Context: Silicone oils, such as dimethicone, are commonly administered against gastrointestinal gas accumulation and are attributed with mucoprotective features. Objective: Evaluation of thiolated silicone oil as advanced antiflatulence with a prolonged retention on small intestinal mucosa as an intended site of action. Materials and methods: 3-Mercaptopropionic acid (MPA) as a thiol ligand was covalently attached to silicone oil. This thiomer was assessed with regard to foam inhibiting action, droplet size of a suitable self-emulsifying system, mucoadhesion and cytotoxicity. Results: Antifoaming activity of silicone-MPA was complying with United States Pharmacopeia (USP) requirements for simethicone as standard antiflatulence. Another antifoaming test performed on porcine mucosa supported silicone-MPA's outstanding foam destruction, as this thiomer was superior in comparison to non-thiolated silicone oil and dimethicone with 14.7 ± 2.1 versus 73.3 ± 9.1 and 66.3 ± 7.5 s, respectively. A significantly enhanced mucoadhesiveness (p50.02) with 26.2 ± 7.1% silicone formulation remaining on small intestinal mucosa after 8 h was evident for the thiomer without any toxic effect. Conclusion: Thiolated silicone oil was found to exhibit excellent antifoaming and superior mucoadhesive features. The prolonged residence time of thiolated silicone oil promises to be beneficial in the treatment of flatulence, aerophagy and inflammation throughout the whole gastrointestinal tract.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.