Summary The multiple functions of lysosomes are critically dependent on their ability to undergo bidirectional movement along microtubules between the center and the periphery of the cell. Centrifugal and centripetal movement of lysosomes is mediated by kinesin and dynein motors, respectively. We recently described a multisubunit complex named BORC that recruits the small GTPase Arl8 to lysosomes to promote their kinesin-dependent movement toward the cell periphery. Here we show that BORC and Arl8 function upstream of two structurally distinct kinesin types: kinesin-1 (KIF5B) and kinesin-3 (KIF1Bβ and KIF1A). Remarkably, KIF5B preferentially moves lysosomes on perinuclear tracks enriched in acetylated α-tubulin, whereas KIF1Bβ and KIF1A drive lysosome movement on more rectilinear, peripheral tracks enriched in tyrosinated α-tubulin. These findings establish BORC as a master regulator of lysosome positioning through coupling to different kinesins and microtubule tracks. Common regulation by BORC enables coordinate control of lysosome movement in different regions of the cell.

Summary AP-1 is a clathrin adaptor complex that sorts cargo between the trans-Golgi network and endosomes. AP-1 recruitment to these compartments requires Arf1-GTP. The crystal structure of the tetrameric core of AP-1 in complex with Arf1-GTP, together with biochemical analyses, shows that Arf1 activates cargo binding by unlocking AP-1. Unlocking is driven by two molecules of Arf1 that bridge two copies of AP-1 at two interaction sites. The GTP-dependent switch I and II regions of Arf1 bind to the N-terminus of the β1 subunit of one AP-1 complex, while the back side of Arf1 binds to the central part of the γ subunit trunk of a second AP-1 complex. A third Arf1 interaction site near the N-terminus of the γ subunit is important for recruitment, but not activation. These observations lead to a model for the recruitment and activation of AP-1 by Arf1.

The ability of lysosomes to move within the cytoplasm is important for many cellular functions. This ability is particularly critical in neurons, which comprise vast, highly differentiated domains such as the axon and dendrites. The mechanisms that control lysosome movement in these domains, however, remain poorly understood. Here we show that an ensemble of BORC, Arl8, SKIP, and kinesin-1, previously shown to mediate centrifugal transport of lysosomes in nonneuronal cells, specifically drives lysosome transport into the axon, and not the dendrites, in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. This transport is essential for maintenance of axonal growth-cone dynamics and autophagosome turnover. Our findings illustrate how a general mechanism for lysosome dispersal in nonneuronal cells is adapted to drive polarized transport in neurons, and emphasize the importance of this mechanism for critical axonal processes.

Wnt signaling is essential for neuronal development and the maintenance of the developing nervous system. Recent studies indicated that Wnt signaling modulates long term potentiation in adult hippocampal slices. We report here that different Wnt ligands are present in hippocampal neurons of rat embryo and adult rat, including Wnt-4, -5a, -7a, and -11. Wnt-7a acts as a canonical Wnt ligand in rat hippocampal neurons, stimulates clustering of presynaptic proteins, and induces recycling and exocytosis of synaptic vesicles as studied by FM dyes. Wnt-3a has a moderate effect on recycling of synaptic vesicles, and no effect of Wnt-1 and Wnt-5a was detected. Electrophysiological analysis on adult rat hippocampal slices indicates that Wnt-7a, but not Wnt-5a, increases neurotransmitter release in CA3-CA1 synapses by decreasing paired pulse facilitation and increasing the miniature excitatory post-synaptic currents frequency. These results indicate that the presynaptic function of rat hippocampal neurons is modulated by the canonical Wnt signaling.Wnt signaling regulates crucial processes in all multicellular organisms, including cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, and morphogenesis. Since its discovery about 25 years ago, Wnt signaling has been extensively studied for its diverse roles in embryogenesis and cancer (1) and, more recently, in neural development and synaptic plasticity (2-5). Several studies suggest that Wnt factors play a role in the formation of neuronal connections, and other reports indicate a specific effect on synapse assembly; for example, in Drosophila embryos overexpression of the Wnt gene DWnt-3, encoding a protein localized in axonal processes, disrupted the formation of commissural tracts (6). Wnt-3 also regulates terminal arborization of neurotrophin-3-responsive spinal sensory neurons before the formation of sensory motoneuron synapses (7). In developing cerebellum cortex it has been found that conditioned medium from granule cells increases the diameter of mossy fiber axons and growth cone complexity, a result mimicked by 9). Wingless, the prototypical Drosophila Wnt, and its receptor are localized at the larval neuromuscular junction (10). Wingless is secreted by motoneurons and accumulates at both the pre-and postsynaptic terminals. The loss of Wingless leads to reduction in target-dependent synapse formation (10).The expression of Wnt ligands and proteins of the Wnt signaling machinery in the mature nervous system (11, 12) suggests that Wnt signaling plays a role in neuroprotection and synaptic plasticity in addition to its role in neurite patterning in the developing nervous system (3, 5, 13). Indeed, Wnt ligands can act locally to regulate changes in neuronal cell shape and pre-and postsynaptic terminals, which are thought to underlie changes in synaptic function and learning. Thus, Wnt ligands would appear to be particularly well suited as mediators of synaptic plasticity (5,14,15).In the present study we report that Wnt-7a, a canonical ligand that stimulates vesicle clusteri...

During the formation of synapses, specific regions of pre-and postsynaptic cells associate to form a single functional transmission unit. In this process, synaptogenic factors are necessary to modulate pre-and postsynaptic differentiation. In mammals, different Wnt ligands operate through canonical and noncanonical Wnt pathways, and their precise functions to coordinate synapse structure and function in the mature central nervous system are still largely unknown. Here, we studied the effect of different Wnt ligands on postsynaptic organization. We found that Wnt-5a induces short term changes in the clustering of PSD-95, without affecting its total levels. Wnt-5a promotes the recruitment of PSD-95 from a diffuse dendritic cytoplasmic pool to form new PSD-95 clusters in dendritic spines. Moreover, Wnt-5a acting as a non-canonical ligand regulates PSD-95 distribution through a JNK-dependent signaling pathway, as demonstrated by using the TAT-TI-JIP peptide in mature hippocampal neurons. Finally, using adult rat hippocampal slices, we found that Wnt-5a modulates glutamatergic synaptic transmission through a postsynaptic mechanism. Our studies indicate that the Wnt-5a/JNK pathway modulates the postsynaptic region of mammalian synapse directing the clustering and distribution of the physiologically relevant scaffold protein, PSD-95.During the formation of synapses, pre-and postsynaptic sides contain specific molecules that are involved in the regulation and plasticity of synaptic transmission (1-3). Although much is known about the molecular mechanisms of synaptic differentiation, major gaps remain in our understanding of the process, particularly with regard to the signals mediating the structuring of the postsynaptic apparatus of central mammalian synapses (2, 4). At excitatory synapses, the postsynaptic side is characterized by an electrodense thick matrix, called postsynaptic density (PSD).3 The PSD contains key molecules involved in the regulation of glutamate receptor targeting and trafficking (1, 5). There is considerable interest in elucidating the molecular mechanism that controls synaptic targeting and trafficking of these proteins in the postsynaptic region because of their essential role in synaptic plasticity (6). Moreover, in neurodegenerative pathologies, such as Alzheimer disease, it has been evidenced that the postsynaptic region, including several proteins of the PSD, is the primary target of the synaptotoxic effect of the amyloid ␤-peptide (7-9).Wnt signaling is essential for neuronal development and the maintenance of the nervous system (10 -12). Wnt regulates synapse formation; in fact, the pioneering work of Salinas and co-workers (12-15) established that Wnt-7a induces the clustering of presynaptic proteins in young primary cerebellar cultures. Also, Wnt ligands regulate neurogenesis of hippocampal stem cells in the adult rat (16), and Wnt-3a modulates long term potentiation in mouse hippocampal slices (17, 18).The expression of Wnt ligands and proteins of the Wnt signaling machinery in the matu...

Highlights d ER tubules localize to the axon, and ER cisternae are retained in the soma d Localization of axonal ER depends on ER-shaping proteins and the MT cytoskeleton d ER-MT crosstalk stabilizes both ER tubules and MTs in the axon d ER-MT crosstalk is critical for neuronal polarity SUMMARY Establishment of neuronal polarity depends on local microtubule (MT) reorganization. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) consists of cisternae and tubules and, like MTs, forms an extensive network throughout the entire cell. How the two networks interact and control neuronal development is an outstanding question. Here we show that the interplay between MTs and the ER is essential for neuronal polarity. ER tubules localize within the axon, whereas ER cisternae are retained in the somatodendritic domain. MTs are essential for axonal ER tubule stabilization, and, reciprocally, the ER is required for stabilizing and organizing axonal MTs. Recruitment of ER tubules into one minor neurite initiates axon formation, whereas ER retention in the perinuclear area or disruption of ER tubules prevent neuronal polarization. The ER-shaping protein P180, present in axonal ER tubules, controls axon specification by regulating local MT remodeling. We propose a model in which feedback-driven regulation between the ER and MTs instructs neuronal polarity.(C) Polarity indexes of the different ER-resident proteins in (A) and (B) at DIV7; n = 15-20 neurons per condition. (D-F) Representative images of neurons co-stained for endogenous RTN4 (green) together with Tau (red) at DIV1 (D) or MAP2 (red) at DIV4 (E) and polarity indexes for endogenous RTN4 at DIV1, DIV4, and DIV7 (F); n = 30 neurons per condition.

Summary Polarized sorting of newly-synthesized proteins to the somatodendritic and axonal domains of neurons occurs by selective incorporation into distinct populations of vesicular transport carriers. An unresolved issue is how the vesicles themselves become sorted to their corresponding neuronal domains. Previous studies concluded that the axon initial segment (AIS) is an actin-based filter that selectively prevents passage of somatodendritic vesicles into the axon. We find, however, that most somatodendritic vesicles fail to enter the axon at a more proximal region in the axon hillock herein referred to as the “pre-axonal exclusion zone” (PAEZ). Forced coupling of a somatodendritic cargo protein to an axonally-directed kinesin is sufficient to drive transport of whole somatodendritic vesicles through the PAEZ toward the distal axon. Based on these findings, we propose that polarized sorting of transport vesicles occurs at the PAEZ and depends on the ability of the vesicles to acquire an appropriately directed microtubule motor.

SUMMARY Plasma membranes of the somatodendritic and axonal domains of neurons are known to have different protein compositions, but the molecular mechanisms that determine this polarized protein distribution remain poorly understood. Herein we show that somatodendritic sorting of various transmembrane receptors in rat hippocampal neurons is mediated by recognition of signals within the cytosolic domains of the proteins by the µ1A subunit of the adaptor protein-1 (AP-1) complex. This complex, in conjunction with clathrin, functions in the neuronal soma to exclude somatodendritic proteins from axonal transport carriers. Perturbation of this process affects dendritic spine morphology and decreases the number of synapses. These findings highlight the primary recognition event that underlies somatodendritic sorting and contribute to the evolving view of AP-1 as a global regulator of cell polarity.