The results showed that overall, all instruments may leave filling material inside the root canal. During retreatment there is a risk of instrument breakage, especially rotary instruments.

The proportion of cases with two canals in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary first molars from Japanese patients was high and similar to that described from studies of other ethnic populations.

A total of 160 resin-simulated canal blocks with 20-degree or 30-degree curvature were prepared by ProFile rotary instruments, GT rotary files, and the balanced force technique with Flex-R files. Using an image analysis computer application, the pre- and postoperative images were stored and superimposed, and then the amount of material removed from the preoperative inner and outer curved walls was measured at five levels in the apical 5 mm of the canal. The time required for canal preparation, including irrigation, and the time taken to change instruments was recorded. At 1 mm from the apical end, the directions of canal transportation were most frequently toward the outer aspect of the curvature, with the only exception being the canals shaped by the balanced force technique in which more was removed from the inner aspect. The balanced force technique required more preparation time than the rotary instrumentation.

No abstract

The most effective irrigation technique for smear removal was 15% EDTA irrigation by means of syringe following instrumentation with 5% NaOCl solution. However, the most effective irrigation technique for debris removal was ultrasonic irrigation regardless of irrigant used. OPW irrigation by means of syringe following instrumentation with 5% NaOCl showed a similar effect to that of 15% EDTA irrigation for removal of smear layer and debris.