TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractThe successful development of a light weight slurry system for cementing long intervals at high temperatures in three dimensional multiple stacked gas zone wells, has been achieved in the Gulf of Thailand. The cementing system has been developed to successfully complete progressively more difficult wells, starting with conventional large bore wells and tubing plus packer completions, and later down-sizing into single monobore wells whereby the tubing is cemented in place. The problems associated with the down-sizing of the wells are further increased by more challenging well paths and higher temperature fields. Many problems and risks were overcome to complete this task successfully. These changes have posed new challenges in primary cementing.Like the well size, the slurry system has also undergone a refinement and improvement process. The local industry has gone from dry blended slurry systems to all-liquid additive slurry systems saving considerable dollars, whilst realizing large gains in slurry flexibility, ease of mixing and improved logistics. Whilst developing and realizing these gains, the system has been refined and successfully applied to smaller, hotter and more difficult wells.This paper presents the concerns associated with cementing these challenging wells where remedial cementing has been effectively eliminated. The processes related to this success, evaluation methods and field results will be discussed.
TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractA survey of cement manufacturers in the Asia Pacific Region revealed that only five companies produce a certified API Class G cement. Because of this, certain countries have been forced to import cement and in many cases ship it great distances. In some situations, API Class G cement can cost three times more than local construction cement. While the authors believe that the API Monogram is an excellent benchmark for oilwell cement, the question is -is it necessary to preclude good local cements from use simply because they are not certified. After all, the key issues for oilwell cement are predictability and performance, not certification In the absence of local API Class G cement, the authors propose two ways to use local cement in oilwell applications. First, work with existing construction cement companies to develop cements that consistently meet specifications of the desired API Class and use it in the field. Second, when and where it is applicable, use construction cement for oilwell cementing. The authors are implementing both techniques successfully in parts of South East Asia. This paper presents historical and technical background as well as laboratory data to support the use of local cements as an alternative to imported API Class G cement. Also, presented are several case studies on the use of local cement in oilwell applications as a means to save drilling costs.
TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractMany wells are damaged in the course of drilling and workover by the use of drilling muds, drill-in fluids, and killpills that contain, amongst other things, polymeric
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.