Multiple sclerosis (OMIM 126200) is a common disease of the central nervous system in which the interplay between inflammatory and neurodegenerative processes typically results in intermittent neurological disturbance followed by progressive accumulation of disability.1 Epidemiological studies have shown that genetic factors are primarily responsible for the substantially increased frequency of the disease seen in the relatives of affected individuals;2,3 and systematic attempts to identify linkage in multiplex families have confirmed that variation within the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) exerts the greatest individual effect on risk.4 Modestly powered Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS)5-10 have enabled more than 20 additional risk loci to be identified and have shown that multiple variants exerting modest individual effects play a key role in disease susceptibility.11 Most of the genetic architecture underlying susceptibility to the disease remains to be defined and is anticipated to require the analysis of sample sizes that are beyond the numbers currently available to individual research groups. In a collaborative GWAS involving 9772 cases of European descent collected by 23 research groups working in 15 different countries, we have replicated almost all of the previously suggested associations and identified at least a further 29 novel susceptibility loci. Within the MHC we have refined the identity of the DRB1 risk alleles and confirmed that variation in the HLA-A gene underlies the independent protective effect attributable to the Class I region. Immunologically relevant genes are significantly over-represented amongst those mapping close to the identified loci and particularly implicate T helper cell differentiation in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis.

This study provides Class IV evidence that the risk of AID after alemtuzumab treatment for MS is time-limited and modified by external factors.

Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of disease modifying therapies on immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) vaccines in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods Four hundred seventy‐three people with MS provided one or more dried blood spot samples. Information about coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) and vaccine history, medical, and drug history were extracted from questionnaires and medical records. Dried blood spots were eluted and tested for antibodies to SARS‐CoV‐2. Antibody titers were partitioned into tertiles with people on no disease modifying therapy as a reference. We calculated the odds ratio of seroconversion (univariate logistic regression) and compared quantitative vaccine response (Kruskal Wallis) following the SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine according to disease modifying therapy. We used regression modeling to explore the effect of vaccine timing, treatment duration, age, vaccine type, and lymphocyte count on vaccine response. Results Compared to no disease modifying therapy, the use of anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibodies (odds ratio = 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01–0.06, p < 0.001) and fingolimod (odds ratio = 0.04; 95% CI = 0.01–0.12) were associated with lower seroconversion following the SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine. All other drugs did not differ significantly from the untreated cohort. Both time since last anti‐CD20 treatment and total time on treatment were significantly associated with the response to the vaccination. The vaccine type significantly predicted seroconversion, but not in those on anti‐CD20 medications. Preliminary data on cellular T‐cell immunity showed 40% of seronegative subjects had measurable anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 T cell responses. Interpretation Some disease modifying therapies convey risk of attenuated serological response to SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination in people with MS. We provide recommendations for the practical management of this patient group. ANN NEUROL 2021

IntroductionInflammation and complement activation are firmly implicated in the pathology of multiple sclerosis; however, the extent and nature of their involvement in specific pathological processes such as axonal damage, myelin loss and disease progression remains uncertain. This study aims to bring clarity to these questions.ResultsWe describe a detailed immunohistochemical study to localise a strategically selected set of complement proteins, activation products and regulators in brain and spinal cord tissue of 17 patients with progressive multiple sclerosis and 16 control donors, including 9 with central nervous system disease. Active, chronic active and chronic inactive multiple sclerosis plaques (35 in total) and non-plaque areas were examined.Multiple sclerosis plaques were consistently positive for complement proteins (C3, factor B, C1q), activation products (C3b, iC3b, C4d, terminal complement complex) and regulators (factor H, C1-inhibitor, clusterin), suggesting continuing local complement synthesis, activation and regulation despite the absence of other evidence of ongoing inflammation. Complement staining was most apparent in plaque and peri-plaque but also present in normal appearing white matter and cortical areas to a greater extent than in control tissue. C1q staining was present in all plaques suggesting a dominant role for the classical pathway. Cellular staining for complement components was largely restricted to reactive astrocytes, often adjacent to clusters of microglia in close apposition to complement opsonised myelin and damaged axons.ConclusionsThe findings demonstrate the ubiquity of complement involvement in multiple sclerosis, suggest a pathogenic role for complement contributing to cell, axon and myelin damage and make the case for targeting complement for multiple sclerosis monitoring and therapy.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2051-5960-2-53) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The impact of relapses on long-term disability in multiple sclerosis remains unclear; however some evidence suggests that relapses play an important role in determining subsequent prognosis. We report on outcome, prognostic factors for recovery and the contribution of relapses to the accumulation of fixed disability in a large series of patients with documented relapses. Two hundred and seventy-nine relapses in 182 patients were assessed before, during and after relapse by expanded disability status scale and data analysed to assess degree of recovery. Factors affecting outcome were considered including sex, age and site of relapse. Mean EDSS prior to relapse was 3.73, during relapse 5.18 and post relapse 4.23. Mean interval to post relapse assessment was 127 days post relapse. Mean residual change in EDSS score (pre to post relapse) was 0.50 points. Overall 49.4 % of patients had a residual increase in disability post relapse of at least 0.5 EDSS points and 32.7 % had an increase of at least 1 point. No significant difference was observed in mean residual EDSS for sex, site of relapse or age at relapse or in the proportion of patients with a residual increase in disability of > or = 1 EDSS point post relapse. 14.4 % of patients had no increase in EDSS score during relapse compared to pre relapse. These results suggest that acute relapses are commonly associated with an objective worsening of disability in the majority of patients with MS and that recovery is incomplete in approximately half and not influenced by gender, age or site of lesion. Therapies which reduce relapse frequency and/or severity might therefore be expected to slow or prevent worsening of disability if initiated prior to the onset of more permanent damage.