The concept of a Medical Emergency Team was developed in order to rapidly identify and manage seriously ill patients at risk of cardiopulmonary arrest and other high-risk conditions. The aim of this study was to describe the utilization and outcome of Medical Emergency Team interventions over a one-year period at a teaching hospital in South Western Sydney. Data was collected prospectively using a standardized form. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation occurred in 148/522 (28%) calls. Alerting the team using the specific condition criteria occurred in 253/522 (48%) calls and on physiological/pathological abnormality criteria in 121/522 (23%) calls. Survival rate to hospital discharge following cardiopulmonary arrest was low (29%), compared with other medical emergencies (76%).

There is a high incidence of serious vital sign abnormalities in the period before potentially preventable hospital deaths. These antecedents may identify patients who would benefit from earlier intervention.

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of a medical emergency team (MET) in reducing the rates of selected adverse events.Design: Cohort comparison study after casemix adjustment.Patients and setting: All adult (;;. 14 years) patients admitted to three Australian public hospitals from 8 July to 31 December 1996.Intervention studied: At Hospital 1, a medical emergency team (MET) could be called for abnormal physiological parameters or staff concern. Hospitals 2 and 3 had conventional cardiac arrest teams. Main outcome measures:Casemix-adjusted rates of cardiac arrest, unanticipated admission to intensive care unit (ICU), death, and the subgroup of deaths where there was no pre-existing "do not resuscitate" (DNR) order documented.Results: There were 1510 adverse events identified among 50942 admissions.The rate of unanticipated ICU admissions was less at the intervention hospital in total (casemix-adjusted odds ratios: Hospital 1, 1.00; Hospital 2, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.24-2.04]; Hospital 3, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.37-2.16]). There was no significant difference in the rates of cardiac arrest or total deaths between the three hospitals. However, one of the hospitals with a conventional cardiac arrest team had a higher death rate among patients without a DNR order. Conclusions:The MET hospital had fewer unanticipated ICU/HDU admissions, with no increase in in-hospital arrest rate or total death rate. The non-DNR deaths were lower compared with one of the other hospitals; however, we did not adjust for DNR practices. We suggest that the MET concept is worthy of further study.

In over 60% of patients admitted to intensive care potentially life-threatening abnormalities were documented during the 8 h before their admission. This may represent a patient population who could benefit from improved resuscitation and care at an earlier stage.

Hypothesis: Intra-abdominal hypertension exerts an effect on renal function independent of other confounding variables. Design: A prospective study of all patients admitted to an intensive care unit following abdominal surgery was undertaken between September 1, 1994, and July 31, 1997, in a single university hospital. Main Outcome Measures: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was measured every 8 hours (normal IAP, 0-17 mm Hg); 18 mm Hg or higher was considered increased. Forward stepwise logistic regression determined whether intra-abdominal hypertension is an independent cause of renal impairment. Results: A total of 263 patients (174 after emergency surgery), whose mean ± SD age was 61.0 ± 18.7 years and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 14.6 ± 7.7, were studied. Intra-abdominal pressure was increased in 107 (40.7%) of the 263 patients. Renal impairment occurred in 35 (32.7%) of the 107 patients with intra-abdominal hypertension and in 22 (14.1%) of the 156 with a normal IAP (odds ratio, 1.62-5.42). Using the Wald maximizing model, renal impairment was independently associated with 4 antecedent factors: hypotension (P = .09), sepsis (P = .006), age older than 60 years (P = .03), and increased IAP (P = .004). Conclusions: To our knowledge, for the first time in a large clinical study, IAP has been shown to be an independent cause of renal impairment, and it ranks in importance after hypotension, sepsis, and age older than 60 years. Surgeons need to be aware of the importance of intra-abdominal hypertension in patients postoperatively.

No abstract

This study was designed to establish if clinical examination can accurately predict intraabdominal pressure (IAP). Between August 1998 and March 2000 a prospective blinded observational study of postoperative intensive care unit patients was undertaken at a major trauma center. IAP was measured using an intravesicular technique and compared with clinical evaluation. An IAP of at least 18 mmHg was considered elevated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predicative value (ppv), negative predictive value (npv), kappa score, and reliability analysis were calculated. A total of 110 patients provided 150 estimates of IAP, which was elevated in 21%. The kappa score was 0.37; sensitivity, 60.9%; specificity, 80.5%; ppv, 45.2%; npv, 88.6%. The mean difference in IAP values between intravesicular readings and clinical estimates was -1.0 +/- 4.1. Prediction of IAP using clinical examination is not accurate enough to replace intravesicular IAP measurements.

No abstract