No abstract

Whether antireflux surgery should be routinely performed at the time of gastrostomy in children with neurological disorders is debatable because of the risk of gastroesophageal reflux. Some argue that these children should be screened for occult gastroesophageal reflux as this will determine the need for fundoplication. This study retrospectively examines outcome in 29 children with neurological disorders who underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) without concomitant fundoplication. Children were included if they had no clinical evidence of severe gastroesophageal reflux before PEG insertion. The median age of children at PEG insertion was 5.6 years (range 1.1 to 18.0). The children were followed for a median of 2.6 years (range 0.4 to 4.9). Insertion of PEG was technically impossible in two children; and an asymptomatic gastrocolic fistula in another child led to subsequent tube removal. Fourteen of the 26 remaining children developed symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux after PEG; five of these showed no reflux on pH monitoring prePEG. Control of symptoms was achieved by medical intervention in 12, but two required fundoplication. Our findings indicate that in the child with neurological disabilities without symptoms indicating severe gastroesophageal reflux, fundoplication is unlikely to be necessary as a consequence of PEG insertion. We conclude that routine investigation for gastroesophageal reflux in the child without severe vomiting can be avoided and the number of antireflux procedures reduced.

Whether antireflux surgery should be routinely performed at the time of gastrostomy in children with neurological disorders is debatable because of the risk of gastroesophageal reflux. Some argue that these children should be screened for occult gastroesophageal reflux as this will determine the need for fundoplication. This study retrospectively examines outcome in 29 children with neurological disorders who underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) without concomitant fundoplication. Children were included if they had no clinical evidence of severe gastroesophageal reflux before PEG insertion. The median age of children at PEG insertion was 5.6 years (range 1.1 to 18.0). The children were followed for a median of 2.6 years (range 0.4 to 4.9). Insertion of PEG was technically impossible in two children; and an asymptomatic gastrocolic fistula in another child led to subsequent tube removal. Fourteen of the 26 remaining children developed symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux after PEG; five of these showed no reflux on pH monitoring prePEG. Control of symptoms was achieved by medical intervention in 12, but two required fundoplication. Our findings indicate that in the child with neurological disabilities without symptoms indicating severe gastroesophageal reflux, fundoplication is unlikely to be necessary as a consequence of PEG insertion. We conclude that routine investigation for gastroesophageal reflux in the child without severe vomiting can be avoided and the number of antireflux procedures reduced.

No abstract

No abstract

SUMMARYYoung infants, particularly following gastrointestinal surgery, are at high risk of septicaemia during parenteral nutrition. Febrile illness in the absence of focal infection inevitably raises suspicion of central venous catheter sepsis and poses the following dilemma: remove the catheter (which may then prove uninfected) and lose venous access, or leave the catheter and risk clinical deterioration? We examined retrospectively the isolates from blood culture during febrile episodes in 13 children who received long‐term (>2 months) parenteral nutrition via a central venous catheter, and assessed the effectiveness of through‐catheter antibiotic treatment during 76 episodes of blood culture positive sepsis. Coagulase‐negative Staphylococci accounted for only 16% of positive isolates, with yeasts accounting for 5%, and Gram‐negative organisms accounting for 46%, suggesting that infection was often associated with bacterial translocation from the gastrointestinal tract. Treatment with the central venous catheter left in situ was successful in resolving infection in 53 (70%) of septic episodes. These findings indicate that, in this specific group of patients, through‐catheter antibiotic treatment is often effective in treating septicaemia. When long‐term venous access is essential, this approach should be tried before recourse to central venous catheter removal. (Int J Clin Pract 2000; 54(3): 147‐150)

No abstract

No abstract