Melatonin activates two brain G-protein coupled receptors, MT

The synthesis of several novel indole melatonin analogues substituted at the 2-position with acylaminomethyl (8-11), acylaminoethyl (5a-k), or acylaminopropyl (13) side chains is reported. On the basis of a novel in vitro functional assay (specific binding of [35S]GTPgammaS), which can discriminate agonist from partial agonist, antagonist, and inverse agonist ligands, 5a,g, h,j and 13 were shown to be partial agonists, 5d,e and 8-11 competitive antagonists, and 5b,c,k putative inverse agonists. Binding and functional assays were performed on cloned human MT1 receptor. Structure-activity relationship considerations indicate that N-[1-aryl-2-(4-methoxy-1H-indol-2-yl)(C1-C2)alkyl]alkanamides represent a lead structure for this type of ligands.

A novel series of melatonin receptor ligands, characterized by a N-(substituted-anilinoethyl)amido scaffold, along with preliminary structure-activity relationships (SARs), is presented. MT1 and MT2 receptor binding affinity and intrinsic activity have been modulated by the introduction of different substituents on the aniline nitrogen, on the benzene ring, and on the amide side chain. Modulation of intrinsic activity and MT2 selectivity of the newly synthesized compounds has been achieved by applying SAR models previously developed, providing compounds with different binding and intrinsic activity profiles. Compound 3d, with a bulky ss-naphthyl group, behaves as an MT2-selective antagonist with sub-nM affinity. Size reduction of the substituent enhances intrinsic activity, as in the nonselective N-methyl-anilino agonist 3i. The phenyl derivative 3g is an MT2-selective partial agonist, with MT2 binding affinity higher than melatonin, showing promising sleep-promoting and antianxiety properties in animal models.

Cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonists reduce body weight in rodents and humans, but their clinical utility as anti-obesity agents is limited by centrally mediated side effects. Here, we describe the first mixed CB1 antagonist/CB2 agonist, URB447 ([4-amino-1-(4-chlorobenzyl)-2-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-pyrrol-3-yl](phenyl)methanone), which lowers food intake and body-weight gain in mice without entering the brain or antagonizing central CB1-dependent responses. URB447 may provide a useful pharmacological tool for investigating the cannabinoid system, and might serve as a starting point for developing clinically viable CB1 antagonists devoid of central side effects.

Three-dimensional homology models of human MT(1) and MT(2) melatonin receptors were built with the aim to investigate the structure-activity relationships (SARs) of MT(2) selective antagonists. A common interaction pattern was proposed for a series of structurally different MT(2) selective antagonists, which were positioned within the binding site by docking and simulated annealing. The proposed antagonist binding mode to the MT(2) receptor is characterized by the accommodation of the out-of-plane substituents in a hydrophobic pocket, which resulted as being fundamental for the explanation of the antagonist behavior and the MT(2) receptor selectivity. Moreover, to assess the ability of the MT(2) receptor model to reproduce the SARs of MT(2) antagonists, three new derivatives of the MT(2) selective antagonist N-[1-(4-chloro-benzyl)-4-methoxy-1H-indol-2-ylmethyl]-propionamide (7) were synthesized and tested for their receptor affinity and intrinsic activity. These compounds were docked into the MT(2) receptor model and were submitted to molecular dynamics studies, providing results in qualitative agreement with the experimental data. These results confirm the importance of the out-of-plane group in receptor binding and selectivity and provide a partial validation of the proposed G protein-coupled receptor model.

Neuropathic pain is an important public health problem for which only a few treatments are available. Preclinical studies show that melatonin (MLT), a neurohormone acting on MT1 and MT2 receptors, has analgesic properties, likely through MT2 receptors. Here, we determined the effects of the novel selective MLT MT2 receptor partial agonist N-{2-([3-bromophenyl]-4-fluorophenylamino)ethyl}acetamide (UCM924) in 2 neuropathic pain models in rats and examined its supraspinal mechanism of action. In rat L5-L6 spinal nerve ligation and spared nerve injury models, UCM924 (20-40 mg/kg, subcutaneously) produced a prolonged antinociceptive effect that is : (1) dose-dependent and blocked by the selective MT2 receptor antagonist 4-phenyl-2-propionamidotetralin, (2) superior to a high dose of MLT (150 mg/kg) and comparable with gabapentin (100 mg/kg), but (3) without noticeable motor coordination impairments in the rotarod test. Using double staining immunohistochemistry, we found that MT2 receptors are expressed by glutamatergic neurons in the rostral ventrolateral periaqueductal gray. Using in vivo electrophysiology combined with tail flick, we observed that microinjection of UCM924 into the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray decreased tail flick responses, depressed the firing activity of ON cells, and activated the firing of OFF cells; all effects were MT2 receptor-dependent. Altogether, these data demonstrate that selective MT2 receptor partial agonists have analgesic properties through modulation of brainstem descending antinociceptive pathways, and MT2 receptors may represent a novel target in the treatment of neuropathic pain.

The design, synthesis, and biological profile of several indole melatonin analogues with a conformationally restricted C3 amidoethane side chain are presented. Examination of the accessible conformations of the melatonin side chain led us to explore some of its fully or partially restricted analogues, 2-12, the binding affinity values of which were utilized to gain further insight on the melatonin binding site. Two pharmacophoric models have been devised for melatonin and the active compounds by conformational analysis and superimposition performed using the DISCO program. In these models, the melatonin side chain can adopt a gauche/anti conformation out of the indole plane. Another contribution of this study regards the observation of a possible binding point interaction around the C2 position of the indole, as suggested by the remarkably increased binding affinity observed in the C2-substituted analogues 6 and 9 and especially in the more rigid analogue 5. The biological activity and the efficacy of the new compounds were tested by measuring the inhibition of the forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation and the GTP gamma S index. Both analyses demonstrated that all of the compounds were full agonists with the exception of 4 and 9, which showed a slight reduction in efficacy and would seem to be partial agonists.

The CoMFA methodology was applied to melatonin receptor ligands in order to establish quantitative structure-affinity relationships. One hundred thirty-three compounds were considered: they were either collected from literature or newly synthesized in order to gain information about the less explored positions. To this end, various melatonin derivatives were prepared and their affinity for quail optic tecta melatonin receptor was tested. Compounds were aligned on the putative active conformation of melatonin proposed by our previously reported pharmacophore search, and their relative affinities were calculated from the displacement of 2-[125I]-iodomelatonin on different tissues expressing aMT receptors. Compounds were grouped into three sets according to their topology. Subset A: melatonin-like compounds; subset B: N-acyl-2-amino-8-methoxytetralins and related compounds; subset C:N-acyl-phenylalkylamines and related compounds. CoMFA models were derived for each set, using the steric, electrostatic, and lipophilic fields as structural descriptors; the PLS analyses were characterized by good statistical parameters, taking into account the heterogeneity of the binding data, obtained with different experimental protocols. From the CoMFA model for the melatonin-like compounds, besides the well-known positive effect of 2-substitution, a low steric tolerance for substituents in 1, 6, and 7, and a negative effect of electron-rich 4-substituents were observed; the information provided by the newly synthesized compounds was essential for these results. Moreover, a comprehensive model for the 133 compounds, accounting for a common alignment and a common mode of interaction at the melatonin receptor, was derived (Q2 = 0.769, R2 = 0.905). This model validates our previously reported pharmacophore search and offers a clear depiction of the structure-affinity relationships for the melatonin receptor ligands.