Purpose: the article summarizes the key characteristics of the population ageing phenomenon and identifies the channels through which it has an impact on the demographic crisis parameters as well as the socioeconomic growth of the country.Methods: the study is based on tracking the consequences associated with the phenomenon of population ageing. Simultaneously, computational and graphical methods, comparative and retrospective analysis of the sex and age pyramids, expert and empirical assessment of the trends in the structure of the population older than 60-65 years, as well as its economic burden per 1,000 able-bodied people, were used.Results: the main parameters of the socioeconomic impacts of population ageing are determined. Age limits and essential features of this phenomenon are revealed. The forecast trend of socioeconomic parameters of population ageing is supported by the SWOT analysis matrix, and a conceptual model for the implementation of systematic adjustment measures for the ongoing demographic crisis is proposed.Conclusions and Relevance: the article demonstrates that population ageing is not a fundamental socioeconomic problem that endangers the well-being of the population over working age. However, it has many negative consequences for the socioeconomic growth of the country that are still being researched; the real threats come not from population ageing as such, but from the existing disproportion in the workload of the population over 60-65 years old per 1,000 able-bodied population. Despite the relative parameters of the ageing trend in Russia, in the future, the life expectancy of the population will be 73.58-75.03 years.
The emergence of neoliberal doctrines in economic science and the formation of an institutional direction and theoretical and methodological aspects of its basis systematically became the engine for the development of socially-oriented market and institutional-market economic relations and property relations, mainly associated with significant transformational processes in economic and social sphere. In general, neoliberalism, being the basis of institutionalism, is represented by economic doctrine, where the main attention is paid to the key role of modern institutional formations in economic decision-making, their effective application. The theoretical and methodological basis and the categorical apparatus of neoliberalism and institutionalism are insignificant, unsystematized and need to be studied and systematic analysis. Therefore, in this article, we, based on the generally accepted terminology of institutionalism, generalize definitions and their derived concepts. Moreover, the variability of the conceptual aspects of neoliberalism and institutionalism needs a systematic interpretation and the further formation of the institutional categorical apparatus. To this end, the features of the methodology of neoliberal institutionalism have been studied. A comparative analysis of theoretical and methodological approaches to determining the nature of institutions is carried out. The causes of the origin of specific
The research objective is to develop scientific and practical recommendations for enhancing the structure of the service system suitable for use in service sector activities, based on a socioeconomic efficiency evaluation. The implementation of this goal involves the systemic study of the foundations of efficiency in the service sector; the analysis of trends in changes in the parameters of the activities of service organizations based on the evaluation of its socio-economic efficiency; the substantiation of the imperative and strategic directions for the development of service sector organizations and their implementation on an innovative basis. The research methods were the fundamental developments of leading economists on the problems of the functioning of organizations in the service sector and the understanding of the foundations for increasing socio-economic efficiency. The methods of logical analysis and generalization, a systematic, comparative approach, tabular and graphical methods for interpreting trends in the main parameters were used. The application of these methods made it possible to: generalize the essence of the problem of the service sector development, identify the principles of the system of organization of public services; determine methods for assessing their socio-economic efficiency, and scientifically comprehend the problem of their further development based on innovative technological models. The main conclusions were focused on the issues of improving socio-economic efficiency in the service sector, as well as in the analysis of trends in the functioning of organizations providing various types of services, and validation of technological models for increasing in the socioeconomic efficiency of service organizations.
In modern conditions, characterized by instability and uncertainty of the socioeconomic situation, the development of strategic priorities for the development of energy retail companies, according to their specific business and comparative advantages, is particularly relevant. In the
The purpose of the study is to substantiate promising ways of institutional support for the process of economic digitalization and ensure the improvement of efficiency indicators in certain areas of activity based on the identification of existing problems in the modern economic system. The object of the study is the processes of institutionalization of the economy, providing trends in the digitalization of the economy and its social sphere. The subject of the study is the problem of institutional support for regulatory systems and the sustainable digitalization of the economy in the foundations of structural changes in key sectors. The theoretical approaches to highlighting the role of institutional structures in stimulating economic growth and establishing factors for effective digitalization of spheres of activity are considered. To achieve this goal, traditional and specific methods of scientific research are used, which allowed us to achieve the main results: determination of the regulatory mechanism for digitalization of spheres of activity, and the feasibility of identified measures of institutional support for economic regulation; and the CITISE http://ma123.ru ЦИТИСЭ №2 (32) 2022
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.