Purpose: To evaluate the influence of silicone oil (SO) tamponade on retinal layers thickness and visual acuity in patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Methods: This is a retrospective case series of consecutive patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with SO tamponade. Visual acuity and central macular thickness were measured with SO and at least a month after SO removal (SOR). Patients with insufficient or poor-quality images or macular pathologies such as macular edema or epiretinal membranes were excluded. Results: Forty-one patients with an average age of 56.1 ± 15.2 years were included, and 54% presented with fovea ON. Average tamponade duration was 151 ± 54 days. Central macular thickness of the operated eye increased from 249 ± 50 µm before to 279 ± 48 µm after SOR (P < 0.001), compared with 281 ± 21 µm of the fellow eye (P < 0.001). A mean change of 26 µm was found in the internal layers (P < 0.001). Visual acuity improved from 0.85 ± 0.97 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR; Snellen 20/140) with SO tamponade to 0.34 ± 0.28 logMAR (Snellen 20/43) after SOR (P < 0.001). For patients with fovea ON and without significant cataract, visual acuity was 0.19 ± 0.16 logMAR (Snellen 20/30) at presentation, 0.59 ± 0.41 logMAR (Snellen 20/80) with SO (P = 0.005), and 0.18 ± 0.15 logMAR (Snellen 20/30) after SOR (P = 0.003). Conclusion: Silicone oil tamponade causes a transient decrease in central macular thickness, mainly in the inner layers. After SOR, central macular thickness resembles to the fellow eyes. The mechanism for this effect is unclear, but apparently has no influence on final visual acuity.
PURPOSE: To present the Tel-Aviv Protocol for patients with progressive keratoconus, which consists of epithelial photorefractive keratectomy (ePRK), and corneal cross-linking (CXL). METHODS: This was a retrospective case series of 20 consecutive patients diagnosed as having progressive keratoconus at Care-Vision Laser Centers, Tel Aviv, Israel. The Tel-Aviv Protocol included laser epithelial ablation using the EX500 excimer laser (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX) with 50% of the manifest refractive astigmatism (on the same axis) while the spherical ablation is added so as not to exceed a total of 50-µm ablation of the epithelium and anterior stroma. Afterward, all patients underwent CXL. Data collected included thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), subjective astigmatism, mean keratometric power, maximum keratometric power (K max ), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). RESULTS: A total of 20 eyes of 20 patients with a mean age of 28.0 ± 6.5 years (range: 13 to 40 years) and a mean follow-up of 823 ± 337 days (range: 266 to 1,749 days) were included. There was a significant improvement in both UDVA (from 0.95 ± 0.73 to 0.22 ± 0.15 logMAR, P < .001) and CDVA (from 0.24 ± 0.13 to 0.13 ± 0.12 logMAR, P < .001) at the end of the follow-up period. There was a significant improvement in mean keratometry (from 46.86 ± 2.48 to 45.00 ± 2.27 diopters [D], P < .001), K max (from 48.18 ± 2.74 to 45.97 ± 2.55 D, P < .001), and K min (from 45.54 ± 2.35 to 44.03 ± 2.12 D, P < .001). TCT was significantly lower following the procedure (from 450.90 ± 35.99 to 404.90 ± 43.96 µm, P < .001). No complications and no progression in keratoconus severity were noticed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The Tel-Aviv Protocol for patients with progressive keratoconus provides good improvement in visual acuity and astigmatism while halting the progression of keratoconus. [ J Refract Surg. 2019;35(6):377–382.]
Both PFCL and SRFD achieved excellent results in terms of retinal reattachment and visual improvement, and have comparable safety profiles. A slightly higher rate of additional surgeries was found in the PFCL group. These findings indicate that PFCL are not necessary in routine PPV for RRD, as they do not improve the results achieved with SRFD and may be less cost-effective due to their higher price and potential for a higher rate of additional surgeries.
Objective. To compare pre- and postoperative characteristics and surgical success rates of patients with and without previous episodes of dacryocystitis, who underwent external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) for nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). Methods. The medical files of all patients who underwent external DCR between 2006 and 2011 in our institution were reviewed. The retrieved data of patients with and without previous episodes of dacryocystitis were compared. Surgical success was determined by postoperative followup of at least 6 months. Results. A total of 185 patients with NLDO underwent external DCR of whom 152 (100 females and 52 males, mean age 67 ± 15 years) met the inclusion criteria. Sixty had previous episodes of dacryocystitis and 92 did not. Left-side obstruction was more common than right-side obstruction among patients with previous episodes of dacryocystitis (48.3% versus 31.7%, resp., P = 0.031). Glaucoma patients were significantly more likely to develop dacryocystitis than patients without glaucoma (P = 0.002). The success rate of external DCR was 94.4% for patients with previous episodes of dacryocystitis and 86.7% for patients without (P = 0.337). Conclusions. The surgical outcomes of external DCR in patients with or without a previous episode of dacryocystitis were similar. Patients with glaucoma and NLDO had a significantly higher risk of developing dacryocystitis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.