Background Tocilizumab blocks pro-inflammatory activity of interleukin-6 (IL-6), involved in pathogenesis of pneumonia the most frequent cause of death in COVID-19 patients. Methods A multicenter, single-arm, hypothesis-driven trial was planned, according to a phase 2 design, to study the effect of tocilizumab on lethality rates at 14 and 30 days (co-primary endpoints, a priori expected rates being 20 and 35%, respectively). A further prospective cohort of patients, consecutively enrolled after the first cohort was accomplished, was used as a secondary validation dataset. The two cohorts were evaluated jointly in an exploratory multivariable logistic regression model to assess prognostic variables on survival. Results In the primary intention-to-treat (ITT) phase 2 population, 180/301 (59.8%) subjects received tocilizumab, and 67 deaths were observed overall. Lethality rates were equal to 18.4% (97.5% CI: 13.6–24.0, P = 0.52) and 22.4% (97.5% CI: 17.2–28.3, P < 0.001) at 14 and 30 days, respectively. Lethality rates were lower in the validation dataset, that included 920 patients. No signal of specific drug toxicity was reported. In the exploratory multivariable logistic regression analysis, older age and lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio negatively affected survival, while the concurrent use of steroids was associated with greater survival. A statistically significant interaction was found between tocilizumab and respiratory support, suggesting that tocilizumab might be more effective in patients not requiring mechanical respiratory support at baseline. Conclusions Tocilizumab reduced lethality rate at 30 days compared with null hypothesis, without significant toxicity. Possibly, this effect could be limited to patients not requiring mechanical respiratory support at baseline. Registration EudraCT (2020-001110-38); clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04317092).

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) represents a major health problem in terms of deaths and long-term sequelae. We conducted a retrospective cohort study at Montichiari Hospital (Brescia, Italy) to better understand the determinants of outcome in two different COVID-19 outbreaks. A total of 634 unvaccinated patients admitted from local emergency room to the Internal Medicine ward with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and a moderate-to-severe COVID-19 were included in the study. A group of 260 consecutive patients during SARS-CoV-2 first wave (from February to May 2020) and 374 consecutive patients during SARS-CoV-2 2nd/3rd wave (from October 2020 to May 2021) were considered. Demographic data were not significantly different between waves, except a lower prevalence of female sex during first wave. Mortality was significantly higher during the 1st wave than in the following periods (24.2% vs. 11%; p < 0.001). Time from symptoms onset to hospital admission was longer during first wave (8 ± 6 vs. 6 ± 4 days; p < 0.001), while in-hospital staying was significantly shorter (10 ± 14 vs. 15 ± 11 days; p < 0.001). Other significant differences were a larger use of corticosteroids and low-molecular weight heparin as well less antibiotic prescription during the second wave. Respiratory, bio-humoral and X-ray scores were significantly poorer at the time of admission in first-wave patients. After a multivariate regression analysis, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin values, % fraction of inspired oxygen on admission to the Internal Medicine ward and length of hospital stay and duration of symptoms were the strongest predictors of outcome. Concomitant anti-hypertensive treatment (including ACE-inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers) did not affect the outcome. In conclusion, our data suggest that earlier diagnosis, timely hospital admission and rational use of the therapeutic options reduced the systemic inflammatory response and were associated to a better outcome during the 2nd/3rd wave.

Calcium controls numerous events within the vessel wall. Permeability of the endothelium is calcium dependent, as are platelet activation and adhesion, vascular smooth muscle proliferation and migration, and synthesis of fibrous connective tissue. Double-helix computerized tomography is a noninvasive technique that can detect, measure, and compare coronary calcification in the coronary arteries. Despite some convincing evidence about the prognostic value and usefulness of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) in the stratification of cardiovascular risk in the high risk general population and also in hypertensive patients, current guidelines for the management of hypertension, do not include such evaluation among the recommended procedures to be performed in the majority of patients even with the intent to detect hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) in an early phase. On the contrary, the European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes, the 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, and the 2018 Cholesterol Clinical Practice Guidelines indicate that the evaluation of CACS may be of some usefulness in specific subpopulations, although this view is not accepted in the US Preventive Services Task Force document. Very recently, the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice stated that CACS estimation may be considered to improve risk classification around treatment decision thresholds. In conclusion, the use of CACS as a diagnostic tool is still controversial. While some evidence exists about is ability to improve stratification of cardiovascular risk in primary prevention, in particular in selected patients who are at intermediate or borderline risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, there is insufficient evidence to use it as a standard means to assess HMOD.

Objective:SARS-CoV2 infection can lead to several clinical scenarios, named COVID-19, ranging from mild manifestations to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), coagulation alterations and endothelial dysfunction. The functional impairment of the microcirculation seems play a key role in the pathophysiology and clinical consequences of COVID-19. However, to date there is no evidence of structural microvascular damage related to COVID-19.Design and method:The aim of this study is to investigate microvascular alterations by adaptive optics and vide-ocapillaroscopy in patients recently admitted for COVID-19 and re-evaluated one year later.Methods: We enrolled 153 patients admitted between February and April 2020 at the Hospital of Montichiari (Brescia) and at the Internal Medicine Department of ASST Spedali Civili - University of Brescia for respiratory failure due to SARS-CoV2-related interstitial pneumonia. Patients were evaluated two months after nalysedsation and after one year. All patients underwent a venous blood sampling for hematochemical tests, evaluation of retinal arteriolar morphology by adaptive optics, assessment of basal and total capillary density (BCD and TCD respectively) at the dorsum of the fourth finger of the non-dominant hand by videocapillaroscopy.Results:Fifty patients with completed follow-up were nalysed. An increase of internal lumen (93.8 ± 13.3 vs. 97.3 ± 14.2 micron, p < 0.001) and a reduction of wall to lumen ratio (WLR 0.30 ± 0.03 vs. 0.27 ± 0.03, p < 0.001) were observed at the follow up visit after one year (Figure). No significant differences were observed in BCD in the dorsum of the finger after one year, whereas a significant reduction in TCD was observed (p < 0.001). Microvascular changes were independent of body mass index and the presence of hypertension or diabetes mellitus.Conclusions:Preliminary data from this study show that patients with SARS-Cov2 infection present an improvement of microvascular structure after one year from the disease, such as a reduction in WLR of retinal arterioles. This suggests that COVID19 might induce structural alterations in the microcirculation which contribute to vascular damage. These changes do not seem to be influenced by the weight, presence of hypertension or diabetes.

Following publication of the original article [1] the authors identified that the collaborators of the TOCIVID-19 investigators, Italy were only available in the supplementary file. The original article has been updated so that the collaborators are correctly acknowledged.For clarity, all collaborators are listed in this correction article.

Aim there is evidence of significant clinical sequelae of COVID-19 that may impair both life length and its quality. Aim of this study was to assess the long-term consequences of moderate to severe SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia in patients requiring high-flow oxygen treatment. Methods This prospective follow-up study included 45 patients with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to a medical ward at the Montichiari Hospital, Brescia, Italy from November 2020 to April 2021 Patients had COVID-19 related pneumonia with respiratory failure and needed at least treatment with an inspired fraction of oxygen of 40% (of them, 59% were treated with Venturi mask and 41% needed non-invasive ventilation). Patients underwent a clinical assessment with standard laboratory testing, chest CT scan, lung function tests with DLCO, and evaluation of vital parameters after a mean of 382 days after hospital discharge. A quality-of-life questionnaire was administered to each willing patient. Results See table for details. While standard laboratory testing showed a substantial normalization, we found persistence of radiological alterations (i.e. ground-glass opacities, irregular linear/reticular opacities) in 61% of patients; mean Tiffenau index (FEV1/FVC) was reduced, although not clearly pathologic (79%) and 38% of patients showed a mild to moderate reduction in CO lung diffusion (DLCO). Interestingly, 54% of subjects showed concomitant presence of radiologic alterations AND persistence of dyspnea OR reduction in CO lung diffusion, while 21% had all three concomitant conditions, compatible with the diagnosis of lung fibrosis. Overall, a total of 75% patients had some degree of functional or structural alteration of respiratory apparatus. We also evaluated quality of life thorough a structured questionnaire: after more than one year 62% of the patients still lamented fatigue, 62% effort dyspnea, 12% anorexia, 29% dysgeusia or anosmia, 31% insomnia and 43% anxiety. Conclusions these data seem to demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia requiring high flow oxygen has a heavy long-term burden, both in terms of persistence of functional and structural pulmonary damage (which may be progressive and evolve to a more severe degree) and of burden on overall quality daily life.

Introduction The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), doesn't affect only respiratory system, but it also involves other organs including cardiovascular system, possibly causing acute or chronic cardiovascular events. Preexisting cardiovascular diseases enhance COVID-19 morbidity, as well. Aim In this retrospective analysis we investigated the onset of cardiovascular events during a time-span of more than one year since hospitalization (384 days). Methods The analysis included 43 patients, who were hospitalized in Internal Medicine Department of Montichiari Hospital (ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia) for moderate to severe SARS-CoV2 related pneumonia treated with high-flow oxygen support (ranging from 40% fraction of inspired oxygen to non-invasive ventilation) Mean age was 63 years, 28% (12/43) were female and 72% (31/43) were male. Thirty-five percent of the patients suffered from heart diseases, 56% of them were hypertensives and 23% had type 2 diabetes; 12% had chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 5% an active neoplasm. 49% of the sample was obese. Nineteen percent took ACE inhibitors and 19% was on ARBs. Statins were taken by 37% of the patients; an antiaggregant by 21%, and an anticoagulant by 2% (see table) Results The follow-up visit included the evaluation of post-covid infection quality-of-life, standard laboratory tests, chest computed tomography, spirometry with evaluation of DLCO. The onset of cardiovascular events during the average period of 384 days was evaluated. None of the 43 patients had major cardiovascular events: coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Conclusions Even if this study failed to demonstrate new-onset CV events, longer follow-up studies performed to evaluate cardiovascular risk following SARS-CoV1 infection showed persistent hyperlipidemia, cardiovascular system abnormalities, and glucose metabolism disorders in a very high number of patients. Further analyses are needed to further investigate longer term cardiovascular consequences of SARS-CoV2 infection.