Data on somatic heterogeneity and germline-somatic interaction in multiple primary melanoma (MPM) patients are limited. We investigated the mutational status of BRAF, NRAS, and TERT promoter genes in 97 melanomas of 44 MPM patients and compared molecular and immunohistochemical findings. We further evaluated the association of somatic alterations with the germline MC1R genotype. Mutations in BRAF gene were identified in 41.2% (40/97) of melanomas, in NRAS in 2.1% (2/97), and in TERT promoter in 19.6% (19/97). Distribution of BRAF mutations did not differ across multiple melanomas (P = 0.85), whereas TERT promoter changes decreased from first to subsequent melanomas (P = 0.04). Intrapatient discrepancy of BRAF mutations among multiple tumors was detected in 14 of 44 MPM patients (32%) and of BRAF/NRAS/TERT promoter genes in 20 of 44 (45%). We observed a high rate of agreement between allele-specific TaqMan assay and immunohistochemistry in BRAF detection (κ = 0.83, P < 0.01) with 86 of 97 melanomas (88.7%) presenting similar BRAF status. Germline MC1R variants were identified in 81.4% (35/43) of MPM patients with no association of MC1R genotype with somatic mutations or with intrapatient concordance of somatic mutational profile. Our results support the genetic diversity of multiple melanomas and show that somatic heterogeneity is not influenced by inherited MC1R variants. Immunohistochemistry may be useful as an initial screening test.

Cutaneous melanoma is one of the most aggressive and treatment-resistant tumours. Intra-patient concordance of mutations in genes, such as BRAF, NRAS and c-KIT, between primary melanoma and related metastases is a critical aspect that has become even more relevant with the introduction of therapies targeting specific mutations. This study evaluated the intra-patient heterogeneity of BRAF, NRAS and c-KIT mutational status in 30 primary melanomas and 39 related metastases, using molecular analysis and immunohistochemistry. Clinically meaningful intra-patient heterogeneity was found between primary melanoma and related metastases, independent of the technical approach, thus supporting the polyclonal model of melanoma progression. Mutations in MAPK signalling genes are driver events in melanoma, and have therapeutic relevance in the metastatic and adjuvant setting. This study evaluated the intra-patient heterogeneity of BRAF, NRAS and c-KIT mutational status between 30 primary melanomas and 39 related metastases, using molecular analysis and immunohistochemistry. BRAF mutations were identified in 46.7% of primary melanomas and 48.7% of metastases and NRAS mutations in 20% and 25.6%, respectively. Intra-patient heterogeneity was detected in 13.3% of patients for both BRAF and NRAS genes and was not associated with clinico-pathological characteristics of melanomas or metastases. High consistency was observed between immunostaining and molecular methods for BRAF V600E (k = 0.90; p < 0.001) and NRAS Q61R (k = 0.87; p < 0.001). These findings demonstrate a relevant intra-patient heterogeneity between primary and metastatic lesions that is independent of clinical variables and methodological approach.

No abstract

ObjectiveA standardization of minor salivary gland (MSG) histopathology in primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) has been recently proposed. Although there is strong agreement that germinal center (GC)-like structures should be routinely identified, due to their prognostic value, a consensus regarding the best protocol is still lacking. Aim of this study was to compare the performance of different histological techniques and operators to identify GC-like structures in pSS MSGs. MSG biopsies from 50 pSS patients were studied.MethodsThree blinded operators (one pathologist and two rheumatologists with different years of experience in pSS MSG assessment) assessed 50 MSGs of which one slide was stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and consecutive slides were processed to investigate CD3/CD20, CD21 and Bcl-6 expression.ResultsBy assessing 225 foci, the best agreement was between H&E-stained sections evaluated by the rheumatologist with more years of experience in pSS MSG assessment and CD3/CD20 segregation. In the foci with CD21 positivity, the agreement further increased. Bcl-6- foci could display a GC, detected with other staining, but not vice versa.ConclusionGC assessment on H&E-stained sections should be performed with caution, being operator-dependent. The combination of H&E with CD3/CD20 and CD21 staining should be recommended as it is reliable, feasible, able to overcome the bias of operator experience and easily transferrable into routine practice.

No abstract