Dermoscopy in one case showed hypopigmented macules having feathery margins. 4 Histopathology revealed a reduced number of melanocytes and melanin pigment in most cases, but one report showed a normal number of melanocytes with macromelanosomes. 5 ASH has been compared with other reticular pigmentary disorders such as Dowling-Degos disease, acropigmentation of Kitamura, acropigmentation of Dohi. Unlike those, macules of ASH are more prominent on margins between dorsal and ventral surfaces of hands and feet, with normal intervening skin.Acral vitiligo can be a differential diagnosis of this condition, but non-progressive lesions in unilateral distribution, unresponsive to treatment in our case, does not favor the diagnosis.Confetti vitiligo presents as speckled depigmented macules of size 1-5 mm. They are usually seen around pre-existing vitiligo patches and are hallmark of rapidly progressing vitiligo. 7 Clinical, dermoscopic, and histological comparison of all differentials are described in Table 1.Previous reports have included ASH in reticular pigmentary disorders. Familial nature of this condition cannot be ascertained as only two reports had a family history. Our case stands apart as the girl has unilateral involvement with family history of vitiligo vulgaris.The etiology of this condition remains elusive. Further reports and genetic workup of speckled hypopigmentation cases may help to unravel the mystery of cause and course of this condition.

A 62-year-old woman reported with progressive pruritus rash that persisted on her buttocks and extremities for a duration of twenty years. She was initially diagnosed with tinea corporis but then the morphological and histological features were consistent with MF. As MF is considered as a “great imitator”, it is important to emphasize that cutaneous characteristics, skin biopsy, histology, and immunohistology may need to be performed in patients with chronic dermatoses resistant to treatment to rule out the underlying malignancy.

Methotrexate (MTX) has been approved for the treatment of psoriasis and is considered to be effective and relatively safe. This drug was widely used for treatment of psoriasis in Vietnam for many years. Life-threatening MTX toxicity is rare but may rapidly develop when the drug is administered. In line with the interface dermatitis and a remarked eosinophilic infiltration in the cutaneous lesion, the diagnosis of hypereosinophilia as an adverse reaction in our patient was supported by the dramatic improvement of symptoms and decreased eosinophils after withdrawal of MTX. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case that showed isolated hypereosinophilia as an adverse reaction of MTX in psoriasis treatment that may challenge in early recognition. Awareness and prompt recognition of this severe adverse reaction can result in life-saving discontinuation of MTX.

Sir, Annular lichen planus is an uncommonly reported variant of lichen planus, especially on the penis [1]. Herein, we report a case of penile annular lichen planus induced by artificial pearls. A 42-year-old, circumcised male presented to our hospital with asymptomatic, annular lesions of the glans penis. Around one month prior to presentation, he reported a history of inserting artificial pearls inside his penis by stainless steel. He denied a history of drug intake or a personal history of hepatitis C. A physical examination revealed multiple, reddish-purple, annular plaques with central atrophy on the glans penis (Fig. 1a). Inguinal lymph nodes and other mucocutaneous lesions were absent.

Introduction: Autoimmune bullous dermatoses (ABD) represent a heterogeneous group of blistering disorders that may be debilitating with high morbidity. Clinical, histological, and direct immunofluorescence (DIF) studies are essential in establishing an accurate diagnosis of ABD, which is essential for its clinical management. Our study objective was to perform a systematic evaluation of ABD cases in a patient population at an academic medical center in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, and determine the degree of concordance of clinical, histological, and DIF findings in ABD. Methodology: A systematic retrospective cross-sectional study was performed on 92 patients diagnosed with ABD by clinical, histological, and DIF studies at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, between September 2019 and September 2021. The clinical histories, H and E stained tissue sections, and DIF stains were evaluated by pathologists at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy. Results: ABD was evaluated as a whole and subdivided into an intraepidermal blister subgroup and a subepidermal blister subgroup. The analysis of paired diagnostic methods (clinical, histological, and DIF) for concordance with the final diagnosis was performed and showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the paired methods (McNemar’s test, p > 0.05). There was moderate concordance between the clinical, histological, and DIF diagnoses among all ABD cases (Brennan-Prediger coefficient Kappa test, κBP = 0.522, CI = 0.95). In the intraepidermal blister subgroup, the diagnostic accuracies of the histology and DIF stains were comparable to each other, and both were more accurate than a clinical diagnosis alone. In the subepidermal blister subgroup, there was no statistically significant difference in each pair of the three diagnostic methods (clinical, histological, and DIF) (McNemar’s test, p > 0.05). The concordance between the clinical, histological, and DIF diagnoses was high for the intraepidermal blister subgroup (Kappa test, κBP = 0.758, CI = 0.95). However, the concordance between the clinical, histological, and DIF diagnoses was slight for the subepidermal blister subgroup (Kappa test, κBP = 0.171, CI = 0.95). Conclusion: Histological evaluation is highly accurate in the diagnosis of the intraepidermal blister subgroup, but it is not as accurate in the diagnosis of the subepidermal blister subgroup in the Vietnamese patient cohort in which clinical, histological, and DIF studies were performed. DIF stains are a crucial diagnostic tool for ABD in this patient population.

No abstract

No abstract

Sir, Porokeratosis is a group of cutaneous diseases presented by epidermal keratinization [1]. Herein, we report the case of a patient with porokeratosis who responded well to carbon dioxide (CO2) laser therapy. A 22-year-old Vietnamese male visited our department with an asymptomatic plaque on the penis present for three months. He denied a family history of similar lesions. A cutaneous examination of the penis revealed an annular, well-circumscribed plaque with slightly raised borders with scales (Fig. 1a). Other mucocutaneous lesions were absent. Fungal microscopy, a rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test, and a Treponema pallidum hemagglutination (TPHA) test were negative. Histological findings revealed a hyperkeratotic lesion with a discrete parakeratotic column. There was the presence of a cornoid lamella, which was a parakeratotic column overlying a small vertical zone of dyskeratotic and vacuolated cells within the epidermis (Fig. 2a). There was also a focal loss of the granular layer. A mild lymphocytic infiltrate could be seen around an increased number of capillaries in the underlying dermis (Fig. 2b). CO2 laser removal was performed. There was no recurrence after a twelve-month follow-up (Fig. 1b). However, a hypopigmented scar was seen. Porokeratosis is an uncommon disorder of keratinization with clinical variants, such as classical porokeratosis of Mibelli, disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis, linear porokeratosis, and porokeratosis palmaris et plantaris disseminata [2]. Porokeratosis involving the genital areas and other adjacent sites is rare [2]. Genital porokeratosis was first described by Helfman in 1985 [3]. More than 69 cases have been reported in the literature [1]. The pathophysiology of genital porokeratosis remains unknown. It has been supposed that porokeratosis is linked to repeated minor frictional trauma. A benign lesion may transform into squamous cell carcinoma or basal cell carcinoma [4]. However, no malignant transformation of genital porokeratosis has been noted in the literature. Genital porokeratosis manifests itself clinically as classic or plaque-type porokeratosis of Mibelli [2]. Histological findings revealed a cornoid lamella with the absence of a granular layer and dyskeratotic cells in the upper spinous zone [2]. Our case may mimic some annular lesions, such as secondary syphilis, fungal infection, and annular lichen planus. Because a fungal examination and syphilis serology were negative, we could exclude fungal infection and annular secondary syphilis. The distinctive histology of porokeratosis such as a cornoid lamella with a decreased granular layer may help to differentiate between porokeratosis and annular lichen planus [4]. Numerous therapeutic methods of treatment exist, including surgical excision, CO2 laser, cryotherapy, topical retinoids, 5% 5-fluorouracil, vitamin D3 analogs, imiquimod cream, and 3% diclofenac gel [2,5].