BACKGROUND Suppression of ovarian estrogen production reduces the recurrence of hormone-receptor– positive early breast cancer in premenopausal women, but its value when added to tamoxifen is uncertain. METHODS We randomly assigned 3066 premenopausal women, stratified according to prior receipt or nonreceipt of chemotherapy, to receive 5 years of tamoxifen, tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression, or exemestane plus ovarian suppression. The primary analysis tested the hypothesis that tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression would improve disease-free survival, as compared with tamoxifen alone. In the primary analysis, 46.7% of the patients had not received chemotherapy previously, and 53.3% had received chemotherapy and remained premenopausal. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 67 months, the estimated disease-free survival rate at 5 years was 86.6% in the tamoxifen–ovarian suppression group and 84.7% in the tamoxifen group (hazard ratio for disease recurrence, second invasive cancer, or death, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 1.04; P = 0.10). Multivariable allowance for prognostic factors suggested a greater treatment effect with tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression than with tamoxifen alone (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.98). Most recurrences occurred in patients who had received prior chemotherapy, among whom the rate of freedom from breast cancer at 5 years was 82.5% in the tamoxifen–ovarian suppression group and 78.0% in the tamoxifen group (hazard ratio for recurrence, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.02). At 5 years, the rate of freedom from breast cancer was 85.7% in the exemestane–ovarian suppression group (hazard ratio for recurrence vs. tamoxifen, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.87). CONCLUSIONS Adding ovarian suppression to tamoxifen did not provide a significant benefit in the overall study population. However, for women who were at sufficient risk for recurrence to warrant adjuvant chemotherapy and who remained premenopausal, the addition of ovarian suppression improved disease outcomes. Further improvement was seen with the use of exemestane plus ovarian suppression. (Funded by Pfizer and others; SOFT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00066690.)

We evaluated different culture conditions to obtain a lineage-selected proliferation of clonogenic megakaryocytic progenitors (MP). In low-density (LD) or CD34+ cell cultures, the best results were obtained in serum-free medium in the presence of megakaryocyte growth and development factor, stem cell factor, interleukin-3 (IL-3), IL-6, IL-11, FLT-ligand, and macrophage inflammatory protein-1α. In paired studies, expansion of LD cells was less effective than expansion of CD34+ cells, and pre-enrichment of CD34+ cells using negative depletion of lineage-positive cells produced significantly larger quantities of MP than pre-enrichment using positive selection. MP proliferation peaked on day 7 in culture, and an 8- ± 5-fold expansion of CD34+/CD61+ cells, a 17- ± 5-fold expansion of colony-forming units-megakaryocytes, and a 58- ± 14-fold expansion of the total number of CD61+ cells was obtained. In a feasibility clinical study, 10 cancer patients (8 with breast cancer and 2 with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) undergoing autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplant received MP generated ex vivo (range, 1 to 21 × 105/kg CD61+ cells) together with unmanipulated PBPC. Eight patients received a single allogeneic platelet transfusion, whereas platelet transfusion support was not needed in 2 of the 4 patients receiving the highest doses of cultured MP. This result compares favorably with a retrospective control group of 14 patients, all requiring platelet transfusion support. Adverse reactions or bacterial contamination of cell cultures have not been observed. In conclusion, MP can be expanded ex vivo and safely administered to autologous transplant recipients. Further clinical trials will indicate the reinfusion schedule able to consistently abrogate the need for allogeneic platelet transfusion support in autologous transplantation.

BACKGROUNDThe immune‐mediated graft‐versus‐tumor (GVT) effect plays a therapeutic role in the treatment of patients with hematologic malignancies who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). More recently, it was reported that a GVT effect also occurred in patients who underwent transplantation for metastatic renal carcinoma. The authors carried out a pilot trial of allogeneic transplantation after a reduced‐intensity, preparative regimen in patients with refractory malignancies, including solid tumors. The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the feasibility of this approach in terms of toxicity and engraftment and to document evidence of GVT effects.METHODSSeventeen patients with Stage IV malignancies (7 patients with renal cell carcinoma, 3 patients with sarcoma, 2 patients with breast carcinoma, 2 patients with Hodgkin disease, 1 patient with ovarian carcinoma, 1 patient with melanoma, and 1 patient with both melanoma and renal cell carcinoma) that were not amenable to further conventional treatment were enrolled. The median patient age was 43 years (range, 10–60 years). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) was 0–1 in 11 patients and 2–3 in 6 patients. Preparative treatment consisted of reduced‐intensity chemotherapy with fludarabine (30 mg/m2 per day for 4 consecutive days) and cyclophosphamide (30 mg/Kg per day for 2 consecutive days) prior to allogeneic HSCT from a human leukocyte antigen‐identical sibling. The median number of CD34+ cells infused was 6.06 × 106/kg (range, 1.5–14.0 × 106/kg). Graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporin‐A and short‐term methotrexate.RESULTSPatients who had a PS of 2–3 prior to undergoing HSCT experienced Grade 4 hematologic toxicities and Grade ≥ 3 organ toxicities and died of either treatment‐related complications or disease progression within 100 days from transplantation. By contrast, 10 of 11 patients who had a PS of 0–1 prior to undergoing HSCT experienced only short‐lasting, Grade ≤ 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia and no organ toxicity; 1 of 10 patients died of graft failure on Day +29 after undergoing HSCT. By Day +90, 100% donor chimerism was documented in all patients with a past history of heavy chemotherapy, whereas mixed donor chimerism was observed in the 4 patients with a past history of only 1 line of chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy prior to entering the HSCT program. Grade 2–3 acute GVHD occurred in 5 patients. Among patients with a follow‐up > 100 days, 2 complete responses and 3 transitory partial responses were recorded.CONCLUSIONSWith this conditioning regimen, full donor chimerism was achieved rapidly only in patients who had received previous intensive chemotherapy. In a proportion of patients with refractory malignancies, allogeneic transplantation resulted in tumor regression. This novel therapeutic strategy may provide little benefit in patients with poor PS and rapidly progressing disease. Cancer 2002;94:2409–15. © 2002 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.10491