This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Background Gliomas are the most common type of malignant brain and other CNS tumors, accounting for 80.8% of malignant primary brain and CNS tumors. They cause significant morbidity and mortality. This study investigates the intersection between age and sex to better understand variation of incidence and survival for glioma in the United States. Methods Incidence data from 2000-2017 were obtained from CBTRUS, which obtains data from the NPCR and SEER, and survival data from the CDC’s NPCR Registries. Age-adjusted incidence rates and rate ratios (IRR) per 100,000 were generated to compare male-to-female incidence by age group. Cox proportional hazard models were performed by age group, generating hazard ratios to assess male-to-female survival differences. Results Overall, glioma incidence was higher in males. Male-to-female incidence was lowest in ages 0-9 years (IRR: 1.04, 95% CI:1.01 - 1.07, p=0.003), increasing with age, peaking at 50-59 years (IRR:1.56, 95% CI:1.53 - 1.59, p<0.001). Females had worse survival for ages 0-9 (HR:0.93, 95% CI:0.87-0.99), though male survival was worse for all other age groups, with the difference highest in those 20-29 years (HR:1.36, 95% CI:1.28-1.44). Incidence and survival differences by age and sex also varied by histological subtype of glioma. Conclusions To better understand the variation in glioma incidence and survival, investigating the intersection of age and sex is key. The current work shows that the combined impact of these variables is dependent on glioma subtype. These results contribute to the growing understanding of sex and age differences that impact cancer incidence and survival.

PURPOSE: Complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) services are more prevalent in cancer centers but continue to be underutilized by patients. This study examines perspectives from patients and caregivers about these services being offered at a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: Patients and caregivers were surveyed about their familiarity, interest, and experience with five CIM therapies: acupuncture, massage, meditation, music therapy, and yoga. Respondents were also asked about their interest when recommended by their medical team and when offered in a clinical trial as well as their willingness to pay for these services. Respondents were also asked about perceived barriers to accessing these services. Chi-squared tests were performed to explore associations between past experience, interest levels, and willingness to pay. RESULTS: A total of 576 surveys were obtained (464 patients and 112 caregivers). Most respondents identified as White or Caucasian (65.6%), female (57.2%), had been a patient for < 3 years (74.2%), had some college education (73.8%), and made > $40,000 in US dollars as their annual household income (69.1%). Respondents were most familiar with therapeutic massage (34.2%) and least familiar with acupuncture (20.0%). The average interest in these services increased from 53.3% to 64.1% when recommended by a medical professional. Respondents were most willing to pay $1-60 for therapeutic massage (62.3%) and least willing to pay for meditation (43.7%). The main barriers to accessing CIM services were cost (56.0%) and lack of knowledge (52.1%). CONCLUSION: Overall, a significant proportion of patients and caregivers were unfamiliar with these five integrative therapies. Increasing education, decreasing cost, and a recommendation by medical professionals would improve CIM usage.

No abstract

No abstract

Background The development of brain metastases (BM) is one of the most feared complications of cancer due to the substantial neuro-cognitive morbidity and grim prognosis. In the past decade, targeted therapies and checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated promising intracranial response rates for tumors of multiple histologies. As overall survival for these patients improves, there is a growing need to identify issues surrounding patient survivorship and to standardize physician practice patterns for these patients. To date, there has not been an adequate study to specifically explore these questions of survivorship and practice standardization for patients with advanced cancer and BM. Methods Here, we present results from a cross-sectional survey in which we analyze responses from 237 patients, 209 caregivers, and 239 physicians to identify areas of improvement in the clinical care of BM. Results In comparing physician and patient/caregiver responses, we found a disparity in the perceived discussion of topics pertaining to important aspects of BM clinical care. We identified variability in practice patterns for this patient population between private practice and academic physicians. Many physicians continue to have patients with BM excluded from clinical trials. Finally, we obtained patient/physician recommendations on high-yield areas for federal funding to improve patient quality of life. Conclusion By identifying potential areas of unmet need, we anticipate this wealth of actionable information will translate into tangible benefits for both patients and caregivers. Future studies are needed to validate our findings.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major public health problem in Sierra Leone, yet reliable estimates of cases are lacking. This study aimed to provide an estimate of the national prevalence of chronic HBV infection in the general population and select groups in Sierra Leone. We used the electronic databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and African Journals Online to systematically review articles reporting hepatitis B infection surface antigen seroprevalence estimates in Sierra Leone during 1997–2022. We estimated pooled HBV seroprevalence rates and assessed potential sources of heterogeneity. Of 546 publications screened, 22 studies with a total sample size of 107,186 people were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of chronic HBV infection was 13.0% (95% CI, 10.0–16.0) (I2 = 99%; Pheterogeneity < 0.01). During the study period, the HBV prevalence rates were as follows: 17.9% (95% CI, 6.7–39.8) before 2015, 13.3% (95% CI, 10.4–16.9) during 2015–2019, and 10.7% (95% CI, 7.5–14.9) during 2020–2022. The use of the 2020–2022 HBV prevalence estimates corresponded to 870,000 cases of chronic HBV infection (uncertainty interval, 610,000–1,213,000), or approximately one in nine people. The highest HBV seroprevalence estimates were among adolescents aged 10–17 years (17.0%; 95% CI, 8.8–30.5), Ebola survivors (36.8%; 95% CI, 26.2–48.8), people living with HIV (15.9%; 95% CI, 10.6–23.0), and those in the Northern Province (19.0%; 95% CI, 6.4–44.7) and Southern Province (19.7%; 95% CI, 10.9–32.8) regions. These findings may help inform national HBV program implementation in Sierra Leone.

Objective: To estimate the prevalence and burden of chronic HBV in Sierra Leone. Methods: We used electronic databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Google Scholar and African Journals Online to systematically review articles reporting hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroprevalence estimates in Serra Leone during 1997-2022. We estimated pooled HBV seroprevalence rates and assessed sources of heterogeneity Results: Of 406 publications screened, 22 studies of total sample size 107,186 were included in the meta-analysis. The crude pooled HBV seroprevalence was 13.0% (95% CI 10.0-16.0) (I2=99%, p-heterogeneity<0.01), translating into 1.06 million people (95% uncertainty interval 0.81-1.30) or 1 in 8 Sierra Leoneans living with chronic HBV in 2021. Sensitivity analysis yielded a pooled HBV seroprevalence of 12.0% (95% CI 10.0-14.0) (sample size 104,968) (I2=98%, p-heterogeneity<0.001). The highest HBV seroprevalence estimates were among adolescents aged 10-17 years (17.0%, 95% CI 8.8-30.5), Ebola survivors (36.8%, 95% CI 26.2-48.8), people living with HIV (15.9%, 95% CI 10.6-23.0) and in the Northern (19.0%, 95% CI 6.4-44.7) and Southern (19.7%, 95% CI 10.9-32.8) regions. HBV seroprevalence progressively declined from 17.9% during 1997-2014 to 10.7% during 2020-2022. Conclusions: These findings necessitate the urgent implementation of national HBV prevention and control programs in Sierra Leone.