Background and PurposeIntracranial atherosclerosis is a common cause of stroke worldwide. It results in ischemic stroke due to different mechanisms including artery‐to‐artery embolism, in situ thrombo‐occlusion, occlusion of perforating arteries, and hemodynamic failure. In this review, we present an overview of current treatment and imaging modalities in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.MethodsPubMed was searched for relevant articles in English that evaluated the treatment and imaging of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS).ResultsAggressive medical management, consisting of dual antiplatelet therapy and intensive risk factor management, is important in patients with ICAS because of a substantial risk of recurrent stroke, approximately 20% in the first year, in patients on aspirin or warfarin alone. Recent trials have suggested that, aggressive medical therapy results in better outcome as compared with intracranial stenting. However, the question remains what the optimal treatment strategy would be in patients with recurrent strokes in the setting of failed aggressive medical therapy. Moreover, controversy exists whether a subgroup of patients with symptomatic ICAS could benefit from intracranial stenting if selection is based on radiological evidence of hemodynamic failure. With regard to imaging, transcranial Doppler ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography are useful screening tests for exclusion of ICAS, but need confirmation by other imaging modalities when stenosis is suggested. Computed tomography angiography has a high positive and negative predictive value for detection of intracranial luminal stenosis of 50% or higher, but performs worse than digital subtraction angiography with regard to establishing the exact degree of luminal stenosis. Novel imaging techniques including high‐resolution CT and MRI better identify plaque characteristics than conventional imaging methods.ConclusionsCurrently, aggressive medical management remains the standard of care for patients with ICAS. Further research is needed to identify high‐risk subgroups and to develop more effective treatments for ICAS patients.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dynamic CTA is a promising technique for visualization of collateral filling in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Our aim was to describe collateral filling with dynamic CTA and assess the relationship with infarct volume at follow-up.
Background Patients with migraine might be more susceptible of spreading depolarizations, which are known to affect vascular and neuronal function and penumbra recovery after stroke. We investigated whether these patients have more severe stroke progression and less favorable outcomes after recanalization therapy. Methods We included patients from a prospective multicenter ischemic stroke cohort. Lifetime migraine history was based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders II criteria. Patients without confirmed migraine diagnosis were excluded. Patients underwent CT angiography and CT perfusion <9 h of onset and follow-up CT after three days. On admission, presence of a perfusion deficit, infarct core and penumbra volume, and blood brain barrier permeability (BBBP) were assessed. At follow-up we assessed malignant edema, hemorrhagic transformation, and final infarct volume. Outcome at three months was evaluated with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). We calculated adjusted relative risks (aRR) or difference of means (aB) with regression analyses. Results We included 600 patients of whom 43 had migraine. There were no differences between patients with or without migraine in presence of a perfusion deficit on admission (aRR: 0.98, 95%CI: 0.77–1.25), infarct core volume (aB: -10.8, 95%CI: -27.04–5.51), penumbra volume (aB: -11.6, 95%CI: -26.52–3.38), mean blood brain barrier permeability (aB: 0.08, 95%CI: -3.11–2.96), malignant edema (0% vs. 5%), hemorrhagic transformation (aRR: 0.26, 95%CI: 0.04–1.73), final infarct volume (aB: -14.8, 95%CI: 29.9–0.2) or outcome after recanalization therapy (mRS > 2, aRR: 0.50, 95%CI: 0.21–1.22). Conclusion Elderly patients with a history of migraine do not seem to have more severe stroke progression and have similar treatment outcomes compared with patients without migraine.
Background and Purpose— Status of collateral circulation is a strong predictor of outcome after acute ischemic stroke. Our aim was to compare the predictive value of strategies for collateral blood flow assessment with dynamic computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and conventional single-phase CT angiography. Methods— Patients with a proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion underwent noncontrast CT, single-phase CTA and whole brain CT perfusion/dynamic CTA within 9 hours after stroke onset. We defined poor outcome as a score on the modified Rankin Scale score of ≥3. The association between collateral score and clinical outcome at 3 months was analyzed with Poisson regression. The prognostic value of collateral scoring with dynamic CTA and single-phase CTA in addition to age, stroke severity, and noncontrast CT was assessed with logistic regression and summarized with the area under the curve. Results— Seventy patients were included, with a mean age of 68 years. We observed an increased risk of poor outcome in patients with poor collaterals on single-phase CTA (risk ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.0–3.1) and on dynamic CTA (risk ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.5–2.7). The prediction of poor clinical outcome by means of collateral adjustment was better with dynamic CTA (area under the curve, 0.84; likelihood ratio test P <0.01) than by single-phase CTA (area under the curve, 0.80; likelihood ratio test P =0.33). Conclusions— Collateral assessment with dynamic CTA better predicts clinical outcome at 3 months than single-phase conventional CTA. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg . Unique identifier: NTR1804. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00880113.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.