Background: Basic life support (BLS) is an integral part of health care. However, teaching of BLS is not yet a part of protocolized curriculum and uniform throughout. The present study is designed to assess the knowledge, attitude and practice of BLS and compare it among trained and untrained medical students and junior doctors in a medical institute. Methods: After approval from Institute Ethical Committee and informed consent from the participant, the present study was conducted among the undergraduate-level medical and nursing students and junior doctors. A questionnaire consisting of 30 questions based on knowledge, attitude and practice of BLS was used to collect data which is evaluated as per scale defined for this study. Statistical significance was assessed using INSTAT software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Zolla, USA). Results: Only 16.41% of all participants and 52% of doctors have received class and/or hands on training. The untrained participants have scored poorly as compared to trained participants in theoretical knowledge and practice of BLS (24.36 % and 53.45% versus 9.25 % and 24.07%) respectively. The mean score for both theoretical knowledge and practice of BLS for trained students was higher than that of the untrained participants and the statistical difference was highly significant-p<0.0001. Most of the participants of both trained and untrained group were having very good attitude towards BLS. Conclusions: Knowledge and practice skills of BLS/CPR are poor in medical and nursing students. A significant portion of trainees do not acquire adequate knowledge in a single session of training. An organised curriculum for BLS and its protocolized training is the need of the hour in medical education.

There is a rising incidence of coronary artery diseases and myocardial infarction (MI). Mortality associated with acute MI (AMI) is directly linked to the time to receive treatment and missed diagnoses. Although health professionals are aware of typical AMI presentation, atypical MI is difficult to diagnose, which on the other hand, is likely to have an impact on morbidity and mortality. Therefore, it is prudent to know such atypical presentations, especially for emergency and primary care physicians. We aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical presentations of atypical MI and analyze them to characterize the common clinical presentations of atypical MI. We researched the PubMed database, did citation tracking, and performed Google Scholar advanced search to find the cases reported on the atypical presentation of MI published from January 2000 to September 2022. Articles of all languages were included; Google Translate was used to translate articles published in languages other than English. A total of 496 (56 PubMed articles, 340 citations from included PubMed articles, and 100 articles from Google Scholar advanced search) were screened; 52 case reports were evaluated, and their data were analyzed. Atypical presentations of myocardial infarction are vast; patients may have chest pain without typical characteristics of angina pain or may not have chest pain. No typical characterization could be done. Most patients were in their fifth decade or above of their life and commonly presented with pain and discomfort in the abdomen, head, and neck regions. Prodromal symptoms were consistent findings, and many patients had two to three comorbidities out of four common comorbidities, i.e., diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and substance abuse. A patient who is 50 years old or more, having comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, history of tobacco or marijuana usage, presenting with prodromal symptoms like shortness of breath, dizziness, fatigue, syncope, gastrointestinal discomfort or head/neck pain should be suspected for atypical MI.

No abstract

Background:Basic life support (BLS) is an integral part of emergency medical care. Studies have shown poor knowledge of it among health care providers who are usually taught BLS by lecture-based teachings in classes.Objectives:This study is designed to assess the effectiveness of class lecture versus workshop-based teaching of BLS on acquiring the practice skills on mannequin.Methods:After ethical approval and informed consent from the participants, the present study was conducted among the health care providers. Participants were grouped in lecture-based class teaching and workshop-based teaching. They were then asked to practice BLS on mannequin (Resusci Anne with QCPR) and evaluated as per performance parameters based on American Heart Association BLS. Statistical analyses are done by Fisher's exact t-test using GraphPad INSTAT software and P < 0.05 is taken as significant.Results:There were 55 participants in lecture-based teaching and 50 in workshop-based teaching group. There is no statistical difference in recognition of arrest, checking pulse, and starting chest compression (P > 0.05). Though more than 83% of lecture-based teaching group has started chest compression as compared 96% of workshop group; only 49% of the participants of lecture-based group performed quality chest compression as compared to 82% of other group (P = 0.0005). The workshop group also performed better bag mask ventilation and defibrillation (P < 0.0001).Conclusion:Workshop-based BLS teaching is more effective and lecture-based class teaching better is replaced in medical education curriculum.

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Periorbital melanosis (POM) is a common aesthetic condition with significant impact. Chemical peeling is a frequently used treatment; yet, an ideal peeling agent is however to find. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of 20% glycolic acid (GA) and 30% lactic acid (LA) peels in POM.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> With approval and consent, the study was conducted from September 2016-August 2017. Patients aged 18-60 years of both sexes, having a constitutional POM were enrolled. Patients known to be allergic to the peeling agents were excluded. Alternate patients were enrolled into Gr-G (20% GA) and Gr-L (30% LA) and were treated every 3 weeks, for 3 sessions and evaluated till 9 weeks. Clinical improvement using POM grading, patients’ global assessment, satisfaction, and physician's global satisfaction were noted. Data are presented in number, percentages and mean±standard deviation. INSTAT software was used for statistical analysis; p&lt;0.05 was considered significant.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Fifty-six (27 in Gr-G, 29 in Gr-L) were enrolled; 70.37% and 68.97% completed the study. Demographic variables, baseline POM grade, and skin types were similar. Compared to baseline, both Gr-G and Gr-L showed significant improvement (p&lt;0.0001). Patient-reported significantly higher improvement in Gr-L (p=0.008) and higher satisfaction. Both the peeling agents were tolerated well with statistically indifferent adverse effects.</p><strong>Conclusions:</strong>Both GA and LA are useful in the aesthetic treatment of the constitutional type of POM. Three sessions of 30% LA peel appears to be better than 20% GA peeling used at 3 weeks apart. <p> </p>